Lumina

Even in a world where sharknado and its ilk are made, I find it difficult to believe that someone would invest in and produce this.

The "plot" simultaneously is all over the place and goes absolutely nowhere. It is truly baffling that someone paid for this script and said, "I HAVE to make this".

You may think, "Well at least there must be some decent acting in it". You would be incorrect. Small town theaters provide more convincing performances than anyone involved in this delivers.

It is so very bad that I'm almost convinced that someone in charge decided early on that they were going to go for a Razzie or something.

The movie does not even have enough substance to be considered for a Golden Raspberry.

I've seen better things made by kids with cheap equipment on YouTube.

Lumina is a sci-fi masterpiece that goes beyond visual spectacle. Gino McKoy's film offers a profound exploration of existence and identity, wrapped in a visually breathtaking package. The slow pacing might deter some, but it allows for a richer, more immersive experience. With strong performances and a narrative that invites deep reflection, Lumina is a must-watch for fans of thought-provoking cinema. The story of Lumina is one of its most compelling features. At its core, the film explores themes of consciousness, identity, and the nature of reality - topics that have long fascinated philosophers and scientists alike.

Gino McKoy's Lumina is a shining example of what science fiction can achieve when it's handled with care, creativity, and an eye for detail. From the moment the film begins, it's clear that McKoy has a strong vision, one that combines stunning visuals with a narrative that challenges the viewer to think deeply about the nature of reality and existence. This isn't just another sci-fi movie filled with flashy special effects and shallow plotlines. Instead, Lumina offers something much more substantial and thought-provoking. The story of Lumina revolves around complex themes of consciousness, identity, and the fabric of reality itself. These are heavy topics, but McKoy handles them with a deft touch, weaving them into a narrative that is both engaging and emotionally resonant.

I suppose I should start with the positives, there aren't many so this shouldn't take long. The cinematography is rather good in some parts. And that....is that.

Everything else is terrible. The script. The plot. The acting. The screenplay. The direction. The editing. The CGI. The music. All of it objectively bad. Not poor, but really bad.

The worst thing about it is the unstructured, uninteresting meandering nature of the film. It is just a collection of scenes that mean nothing.

The characters and their relationship to each other is non existent.

You always know a bad movie when Eric Roberts turns up to collect his pension. Although he was in The Dark Knight, so I will cut him some slack.

In the vast cosmos of science fiction cinema, where imaginative storytelling and visual spectacle often collide, "Lumina" attempts to carve out its own niche. However, it tragically falls short, earning its place in the annals of film history as one of the worst sci-fi movies ever made.

At its core, "Lumina" revolves around a dystopian future where humanity has harnessed a mysterious energy source known as Lumina, which promises to solve the world's energy crisis. Unfortunately, the film's premise is one of its few redeeming qualities. The narrative quickly devolves into a muddled mess, with plot holes so vast they could swallow entire planets. Characters are introduced with little to no development, leaving audiences struggling to connect with their motivations or stakes. The protagonist, a lackluster hero named Zara, played by an uninspired actress, is a prime example of this failure. Her journey from a disillusioned scientist to a reluctant savior feels more like a series of obligatory tropes than a coherent arc.

Visually, "Lumina" is a mixed bag. The film boasts some ambitious set designs and special effects, yet they are undermined by a glaring lack of coherence in execution. The CGI, which could have elevated the film's otherworldly aesthetic, often appears unfinished or poorly integrated. In one particularly egregious scene, a supposed alien landscape looks more like a poorly rendered video game from the early 2000s, pulling viewers out of the narrative and into a realm of unintentional comedy.

The dialogue is another significant flaw, with cringe-worthy lines that are more likely to elicit laughter than emotional engagement. The attempts at philosophical musings on energy consumption and environmentalism feel forced and preachy, lacking the subtlety that great sci-fi often employs to provoke thought. Instead, they come off as hollow platitudes, further distancing the audience from the film's already flimsy narrative.

Despite its shortcomings, "Lumina" does offer a few moments of unintentional humor and absurdity that may appeal to audiences seeking a so-bad-it's-good experience. However, these fleeting moments are not enough to redeem the overall experience.

In conclusion, "Lumina" serves as a cautionary tale about the pitfalls of sci-fi filmmaking. With a weak script, poor character development, and lackluster visuals, it's a film that squanders its potential. While some might find enjoyment in its flaws, for most viewers, it will remain a forgettable entry in the sci-fi genre-an unfortunate reminder that not all journeys through the stars are worth taking.