World premiere, London Greek Film Festival, May, 2016, WINNER, BEST FEATURE FILM.World premiere, London Greek Film Festival, May, 2016, WINNER, BEST FEATURE FILM.World premiere, London Greek Film Festival, May, 2016, WINNER, BEST FEATURE FILM.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Awards
- 1 win total
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Despite the "actors" best attempts to ruin this documentary, it is quite interesting and accurate.
It could have done without the embarrassing reconstructions, the acting would have to improve 100% to even be described as wooden!
I appreciate that the budget for this documentary might have been on the lower end, but what has been produced here is an absolutely fascinating retelling of a moment in history that we all know and love.
This re telling really had me on the edge of my seat at times, and it felt like I was really there!!
I loved the attention to detail with the accuracy of the armour and weapons of the time, which you find Hollywood budgets sometimes get completely wrong, but this was so immersive.
The historians and professors bring so much knowledge and historical nuance, and open up avenues of thought on this battle that I had never even considered.
It's also great to see actors with real haircuts and beards, it's so immersion breaking in documentaries when obviously false beards and wigs are used.
This re telling really had me on the edge of my seat at times, and it felt like I was really there!!
I loved the attention to detail with the accuracy of the armour and weapons of the time, which you find Hollywood budgets sometimes get completely wrong, but this was so immersive.
The historians and professors bring so much knowledge and historical nuance, and open up avenues of thought on this battle that I had never even considered.
It's also great to see actors with real haircuts and beards, it's so immersion breaking in documentaries when obviously false beards and wigs are used.
The history in this documentary is sound but the way they tell the story makes it nearly impossible to follow. I generally like the documentary/reenactment method of historical storytelling but have never seen it pulled off in such a bad way.
Michael Scott is a very good history presenter, which makes it all the more strange that the makers of this film used him so sparingly.
The less said about the green screens the better.
Michael Scott is a very good history presenter, which makes it all the more strange that the makers of this film used him so sparingly.
The less said about the green screens the better.
We decided to view it as "Jim Gaffigan's Australian Historical Reenactor's 300" and laughed like crazy. It's campily cheesy but does debunk a lot of the myths in favor of more considered and layered knowledge.
People have unrealistically high expectations these days-don't let the fake leopard, tiger, snake, zebra prints put you off. Listen to the information, consider it and have a little fun while doing it.
People have unrealistically high expectations these days-don't let the fake leopard, tiger, snake, zebra prints put you off. Listen to the information, consider it and have a little fun while doing it.
I tried and tried to ignore the heavy Australian accents, which made it hard to take this documentary hard to take seriously. The portrayal of the historical figures by the Australian actors was bad. And the dialogue by the historical experts seemed very clunky.
Did you know
- Trivia"300 Spartans: The Real Story" is based in part on "The Histories" by Herodotus written around 425 BCE.
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $85,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 13m(73 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 16:9 HD
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content