Climate Hustle

Having had minimal exposure to the main arguments of climate skeptics I was excited to understand the other side of the story. The oft quoted idea that the "science is settled" when it comes to climate change is a contradiction of terms. By the very nature of the scientific process, nothing is settled or incontrovertible or otherwise beyond question. So it had always worried me how people spoke about climate change with the zealotry of the religious when the climate is, perhaps only second to the human brain, the most complex system known to science.

The film dipped into important points such as the history of the Earth's climate, the questions that still surround the role that CO2 does or doesn't play in the greenhouse effect and the distortion and misrepresentation of data by politicians and the media. All these things were brushed upon but relevant data and case studies to back up the claims were missing or fleetingly referenced. Sweeping claims such as "we are in a CO2 deficit" and "the Earth in greener than ever" were made without qualification. Is crop production better than ever? Are forests thriving more than ever? What other factors could contribute to this?

The graph depicting the concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere for the last billion years or so was deliberately misleading. Not least because the atmosphere of 500 million years ago could not support human life. Such graphics and claims, rapidly flashed on the screen then gone before relevant questions can be asked or answered, characterized the film from start to finish.

The conspiratorial theme of the card hustle throughout was also tiresome and does climate skeptics no service. It comes with the implication that those who passionately advocate for climate change are being willfully dishonest or at least there are some great masterminds behind the hoax who are pulling the strings. This is where skepticism turns conspiratorial and an otherwise receptive audience is lost.

I am sympathetic to the subject matter of the film. I've heard enough inconsistencies and issues in the mainstream climate change rhetoric to question its wisdom. This film introduced some interesting points but was not the well presented case I hoped it might be.

This production is only useful to show how out-of-context interviews, incomprehensible graphs and non-experts from irrelevant fields can be piled into a large enough trash heap to support any worldview.

Reading the reviews that have obviously been written by pro 'Climate Change' interests; I can see that the 'hustle' by the con men is still being maintained. This documentary provides answers and examples of how Climate Change is a political construct rather than a scientific fact. And, more importantly, testimonies from eminent scientists who are willing to call the other side out publicly. When 'Al Gore's army' can do the same I might begin to stop laughing at them. 'Climate Hustle' is a great documentary and I suggest people watch it and make up their own minds. Peter Faulkner

This is the first time I have ever seen IMDb attack the source of a movie. Certainly it's not common other than being common practice to attack those who disagree with the man made climate change scare.

The whole climate change movement was once called global warming until that title was losing ground. (Hard to argue that climate changes, it changes every day, throughout year and throughout the centuries.) Why does the man made climate change panic need to be politically protected? Real science accepts challenge and offers the ability to recreate data. There have been deleted email, limits to the years viewed, black balling legitimate scientists that disagree and more.

From a personal view, I can't be the only one who remembers the global cooling, pending ice age scare from a few decades back.

Follow the money, lots of people getting rich and powerful by pushing this.

Hoping to see this. Locally appearing one day with one showing.

A documentary of compelling arguments like; you can't get a percent of 97 when the research numbers are 77 of 79, and, outlawing hunting polar bears after 1972 increased their numbers to disprove climate change. What. The. Fudge is wrong with these idiots?