Kannappa
- 2025
- 3h 3m
An atheist hunter Kannappa becomes a devotee of Lord Shiva and plucked out his eyes in an act of devotion.An atheist hunter Kannappa becomes a devotee of Lord Shiva and plucked out his eyes in an act of devotion.An atheist hunter Kannappa becomes a devotee of Lord Shiva and plucked out his eyes in an act of devotion.
Featured reviews
A great cast, a poor screenplay and a disastrous storyline is what brings Kanappa together.
The future generation of Manchu family (Vishnu's kuds) are introduced in the first 10 minutes. Sharat kumar, Mohanlal, Brahmanandam could have done better roles.
The casting is a big minus. Especially Akshay Kumar for Shiva, Vishnu for Thinnada
The direction was oppressed by the senior actors esp Mohan babu, when his character wins some sense until Prabhas/Rudra comes to the screen. Acting is surely an understatement.
The movie flatters boredom right from the start as the script lacked conviction. It was more a natural tour of New Zealand.
Srikalahasti is a legendary tale, they should have focused more on that. But when amateur directors are welcomed, this is what we get best.
The future generation of Manchu family (Vishnu's kuds) are introduced in the first 10 minutes. Sharat kumar, Mohanlal, Brahmanandam could have done better roles.
The casting is a big minus. Especially Akshay Kumar for Shiva, Vishnu for Thinnada
The direction was oppressed by the senior actors esp Mohan babu, when his character wins some sense until Prabhas/Rudra comes to the screen. Acting is surely an understatement.
The movie flatters boredom right from the start as the script lacked conviction. It was more a natural tour of New Zealand.
Srikalahasti is a legendary tale, they should have focused more on that. But when amateur directors are welcomed, this is what we get best.
Such a horrible screenplay if anyone values 3 hours pf valuable time refea8n from the movie . Story telling is at the lowest no proper BGM, cheap graphics . Hero has built body eating too much of meat but not investiled time to sharpen his acting skills. Expressions are horrible . Only saviour is 15 mins of prabhas. Better to watch it on OTT moving fast forward button.
I need my 3 hours of vaouable time back wasted my life trustong this horrible movie makers not worth watching....
Location is out of sync to movie, the primary focus is lost in story telling by director. Ecpressionless cast except prabhas.
Dont waste time.
I need my 3 hours of vaouable time back wasted my life trustong this horrible movie makers not worth watching....
Location is out of sync to movie, the primary focus is lost in story telling by director. Ecpressionless cast except prabhas.
Dont waste time.
This movie is great-like, unbelievably great. You'll totally get it once you watch it... or maybe you won't. We already know the story, but don't worry-they've managed to throw in some "surprises" that'll leave you shocked...
The screenplay? Oh, it's full of mind-blowing stuff-so much that your brain might just shut down to protect itself. Some scenes really make you wonder what the writers were thinking-or smoking.
The locations and costumes? Out of this world! Literally, like someone hit random on a Pinterest mood board. And the actors? They fit into their roles so perfectly... like a fork in a bowl of soup.
Manchu Vishnu in the lead? Absolutely fantastic. Truly a performance for the ages. Oscars, beware.
Akshay Kumar as Lord Shiva isn't silly at all, no matter what people say. It's perfect... in some alternate universe. Kajal is cute and sexy.
Everyone else did okay-except Prabhas. Poor guy looks completely lost, and next to Manchu Vishnu (the star of the decade), he just fades into the background. Maybe they should've gone for someone more famous.
The last 40 minutes? An experience, no doubt. You'll either laugh, cry, or leave.
So yes, go watch it. Especially if you enjoy dark humor... or just want to test your emotional strength. God bless you and good luck.
The screenplay? Oh, it's full of mind-blowing stuff-so much that your brain might just shut down to protect itself. Some scenes really make you wonder what the writers were thinking-or smoking.
The locations and costumes? Out of this world! Literally, like someone hit random on a Pinterest mood board. And the actors? They fit into their roles so perfectly... like a fork in a bowl of soup.
Manchu Vishnu in the lead? Absolutely fantastic. Truly a performance for the ages. Oscars, beware.
Akshay Kumar as Lord Shiva isn't silly at all, no matter what people say. It's perfect... in some alternate universe. Kajal is cute and sexy.
Everyone else did okay-except Prabhas. Poor guy looks completely lost, and next to Manchu Vishnu (the star of the decade), he just fades into the background. Maybe they should've gone for someone more famous.
The last 40 minutes? An experience, no doubt. You'll either laugh, cry, or leave.
So yes, go watch it. Especially if you enjoy dark humor... or just want to test your emotional strength. God bless you and good luck.
"KANNAPPA" (2025), a Telugu-language mythological devotional film directed by Mukesh Kumar Singh, attempts to portray the life of Kannappa, a devoted follower of Lord Shiva.
As someone unfamiliar with the legend of Kannappa, I found the film largely unsuccessful in bringing his story to life.
At 3 hours and 3 minutes, the movie is excessively long, but my issue isn't with its runtime-it's with the sluggish pacing, unnecessary vulgarity for a devotional film, forgettable dialogue, and underdeveloped characters.
While the story centers on Kannappa, it also tries to mimic the grandeur of Baahubali, with Kannappa and Nemali resembling Prabhas and Tamannaah's characters from that epic.
Even the villain feels like a recycled version of Baahubali's Kaalikey.
The star-studded cast, including Akshay Kumar, Mohanlal, Kajal Aggarwal, Mukesh Rishi, and Prabhas, is impressive but underutilized. Most actors are sidelined or given lackluster roles.
The visual effects are also feel low quality and literally bad.
Prabhas shines in his scenes, but his entry comes only after two hours, by which point the film has already dragged. The first two hours feel bloated and could easily have been condensed into 40-50 minutes to maintain momentum.
Ultimately, Kannappa fails as a family-friendly devotional or mythological film due to its inappropriate content and lackluster execution. I wouldn't recommend it for those seeking a meaningful cinematic experience.
As someone unfamiliar with the legend of Kannappa, I found the film largely unsuccessful in bringing his story to life.
At 3 hours and 3 minutes, the movie is excessively long, but my issue isn't with its runtime-it's with the sluggish pacing, unnecessary vulgarity for a devotional film, forgettable dialogue, and underdeveloped characters.
While the story centers on Kannappa, it also tries to mimic the grandeur of Baahubali, with Kannappa and Nemali resembling Prabhas and Tamannaah's characters from that epic.
Even the villain feels like a recycled version of Baahubali's Kaalikey.
The star-studded cast, including Akshay Kumar, Mohanlal, Kajal Aggarwal, Mukesh Rishi, and Prabhas, is impressive but underutilized. Most actors are sidelined or given lackluster roles.
The visual effects are also feel low quality and literally bad.
Prabhas shines in his scenes, but his entry comes only after two hours, by which point the film has already dragged. The first two hours feel bloated and could easily have been condensed into 40-50 minutes to maintain momentum.
Ultimately, Kannappa fails as a family-friendly devotional or mythological film due to its inappropriate content and lackluster execution. I wouldn't recommend it for those seeking a meaningful cinematic experience.
This is a movie where actor is boasted for his height and muscular body. Lack of humbleness and bad screenplay, story.
Lack of intensity, Manchu Vishnu's horrible acting and lack of background vfx faults the movie heavily.
Movie also lacks philosophical values. At one point, Vishnu says "pride? I'm the son of kunthi" which means, he's Arjuna and Arjuna never lacked in humble character like shown in the film. It rewrites philosophical values of Mahabharata. Honestly, except the locations, this movie lacks everything.
Movie team made the hype bluff where they overpromised scenes, characterization and devotion. But it actually shows romance, emotions against devotion.
Lack of intensity, Manchu Vishnu's horrible acting and lack of background vfx faults the movie heavily.
Movie also lacks philosophical values. At one point, Vishnu says "pride? I'm the son of kunthi" which means, he's Arjuna and Arjuna never lacked in humble character like shown in the film. It rewrites philosophical values of Mahabharata. Honestly, except the locations, this movie lacks everything.
Movie team made the hype bluff where they overpromised scenes, characterization and devotion. But it actually shows romance, emotions against devotion.
Details
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $137,004
- Runtime3 hours 3 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content