Red Christmas

I generally like aussie horror films a lot, quite a few gems in the outback and such & this one, despite the ratings, was a very intriguing choice - A directional debut by an aspiring filmmaker who put his all, financial and mental, in making a low-budget slasher about an aborted fetus seeking revenge on his family. How did it go? Considerably well, I'd say.

"Red Christmas" is, overall, quite the messy amateur horror flick, a comic slasher that's, for the most part, self-conscious enough. The plot is morally questionable, I suppose that's where some of the bad ratings come from - the movie tackles subjects of abortion and down syndrome in not exactly the most sophisticated ways. However, I'm not taking points away from it because of those themes. I take points away for the entirety of story simply being average. The first half an hour is decent, the dysfunctional family theme works, the introduction of the villain is decent - but all gets more murky as the movie goes on. Basically, in the core it's a Slasher, so, everyone's familiar with the tropes. I thought the cast did a pretty good job, there were definitely enough over-acting moments and the characters can be cartoon-ish, but the performances provided some entertainment. Dee Wallace gave her best as the life-tired and caring mother, confronted by her past traumas. "Red Christmas" has some cool and creative kills while also managing not to rely solely on violence - gorehounds will find something to their liking. Visually it was equal parts good and chaotic, muddled - we got dynamic and creative camera work that sometimes goes well overboard, candy-colored and contrastive cinematography with lighting that raises an eyebrow every now and then & inescapably, a vibe, a sense of student-like filmmaking.

I believe that by any general/objective standards "Red Christmas" is average at the most, but for the genre fans & b-movie fanatics it can be a fun holiday horror that smells like independence, effort and both defeated and lost filmmaking challenges. My rating: 5/10.

Most Christmas horror movies revolve around psychopathic killers dressed up in Santa suits or feature mythological Holiday season creatures. Some others feature dysfunctional families butchering each other over Christmas dinner, and a few noteworthy exceptions deal with satanic elves. "Red Christmas", on the other hand, has a totally unique premise... In this bonkers movie, Aussie family members gathering around the matriarch's Christmas tree are getting slaughtered one by one by a freak in bandages and a cloak who turns out to be an aborted fetus!

All this may sound awesome (and the main premise most definitely is), but "Red Christmas" is nonetheless a huge disappointment of a Christmas horror movie, and this also despite a couple of gory kills and the presence of a bona fide horror cinema icon; namely Dee Wallace ("The Howling", "Cujo", "The Hills have Eyes"). What went wrong? Mainly the awful editing, shaky camerawork, and the dreadful overuse of hideous green-red-blue color patterns. The screenplay often makes bizarre leaps in logic, and creating suspense or atmosphere never seems to be a priority for writer/director Craig Anderson. Two or three great murders and colorful decorations aren't enough to make a good holiday-horror classic, unfortunately.

A mother (Dee Wallace) must protect her family on Christmas Day from a demented stranger (Sam Campbell) who is hell-bent on tearing them apart after being rejected.

The 2016 Fantasia International Film Festival shattered my expectations, and not always in a good way. Two of the best surprises were Geoff Redknap's "The Unseen" and the conspiracy-themed "Man Underground". But then we had the proverbial stinkers. Takashi Miike added a dud to hid otherwise illustrious career with "Terraformars". And then there is "Red Christmas", a modern slasher.

First of all, I am a big fan of Christmas-themed horror films. Not all are winners ("Silent Night, Deadly Night II") but almost all are at least entertaining. And "Red Christmas" has Dee Wallace both starring and producing, which is a good thing – she has been a genre icon for over three decades thanks to "E.T.", "Cujo" and "The Hills Have Eyes", among others. But somehow these two strengths just do not carry the picture.

And then there are secondary considerations. I also love most slasher films, and you have to appreciate the design that went into Cletus. He is certainly one of the more refreshing masked killers we have seen in years, with no comparison in recent memory. And the idea of having an abortion clinic theme was very wise, as it makes you realize how much this is an untapped area for horror. There was John Carpenter's lackluster "Pro-Life" (2006), but no other horror movie touching on this taboo topic comes to mind. So these were some of the few strong points.

But the shortcomings just far outweigh the positives that everyone brought to the table. The dialogue seemed poorly scripted and delivered, while the pregnant woman looked like she was literally holding up a beach ball under her dress. Every character makes poor decisions; and while poor decisions are common in slasher films, these may be among the worst. The lighting – what is up with the neon lighting? I presume it is supposed to be Christmas lights, but it does not look like them (and how are they working if the power is out?). And let us not get started on the stereotypical, one-dimensional closeted Christian pastor.

One of the biggest downfalls is actually making the film a Christmas story. There is a bit of Christmas-related plot (the giving of gifts), but this is rather irrelevant to the story at large. Cletus could have shown up on any day of the year and it would have been just as well. The setting of Australia also seems wrong for Christmas, because an important part of Christmas horror is snow. I suppose this criticism might be unfair to Australians because it more or less suggests they cannot make Christmas horror films… but I think my point is really that if you are going for a Christmas theme, really make it somehow recognizable (hint: snow) or important to the plot. Instead, it seems like this was just pandering, trying to capitalize on a title that is similar to "Black Christmas"… and this film is not even as good as the "Black Christmas" remake, which is saying something.

I may be coming down unusually hard on the film. After all, "Red Christmas" is better than many of the low-budget horror films that flood the market these days. And I have to give them credit for the practical effects; some are rough, but I'd rather see a bad practical effect than bad CGI. What really disappointed me, to be honest, was how this film made the cut for Fantasia. With the dozens of top-notch world premieres, it is a shame when something like this slips through. Critic Matt Donato really sums it up when he says the movie "falls short of being the next killer yuletide classic." Yep.

When first reviewing the film, I wrote, "Expect it to die a quiet death on video store shelves." This has since come to be half correct. On the one hand, it did not get a wider theatrical release. And for a movie that I saw in July 2016, it seems like October 2017 is an awful long time to go from festival to Blu-ray. However, the company that picked it up is Artsploitation, who have some solid titles under their belt (Jonas Govaerts' "Cub" comes to mind). Soclearly they believe there is something marketable here -- perhaps more than the derivative title and the star power of Wallace.

You do not have to take my word for it. Thanks to the power of Blu-ray, the film can now be yours, and with a nice batch of special features. There are a handful of interviews, and most crucially the feature-length commentary from the director. Commentaries can tell you the secrets of how good films are made, or perhaps in this case give the creator 90 minutes to defend himself. You be the judge.

Personally I don't think this film has a political agenda, either pro-life or pro-choice. All the characters are awful IMO. I think the reason for the bad reviews comes down to politics. Christmas + abortion. What a heartwarming combination! but if you can get past that, I actually really enjoyed the film. It wasn't as shallow as the typical hack and slash horror flick. No, not every scene was realistic, but so what? Very few horror films are. Recommended for anyone that isn't politically sensitive and enjoys horror.

When I read the synopsis for this movie and saw that Dee Wallace was in it, I did decide to give it a go, because the movie had the potential of actually being a fun movie.

As it turned out, then "Red Christmas" has a very poorly written storyline, and was equally poorly executed on the screen. The storyline was so generic and predictable that it was insulting to the audience.

The cast were doing good jobs with whatever little material they had to work with, and as expected it was Dee Wallace that carried the movie most of the way.

"Red Christmas" had adequate special effects, although it made no sense that a woman could be chopped in two by a single blow with an axe.

The characters were generic and one-dimensional, and you didn't really connect with any of them.

This was hardly a memorable movie in any way, and it doesn't have the contents to support more than just a single viewing. All in all, don't really bother with this movie unless you have nothing better to watch or if you are a die-hard fan of anyone on the cast list.