One Under the Sun

Here is another one of these films that is horrible but has a high score, 71% of voters scored it a 10! Will it win multiple Oscars? LOL not! Us longer term members on IMDb know that sadly ratings on IMDb have nothing to do with the truth, and any hope that we used to have on here via the forum part is a thing of the past, and makes me wonder what direction IMDb is going too, but back to this blockbuster (LOL), acting is horrible, camera work is done with a handy cam, the music stinks, with other words this film has nothing going for it. I can't really comment on the story line as I could only take about 30 minutes of this rubbish, don't waste your time on this as life is just to short.

I gave it a zero out of 10 and I am sure the score of 8.4 won't last!

Not only a crappy movie (Yes even for a C movie), but they had the nerves to lie about the ratings on IMDb. I hope for the sake of humankind that these people never make a movie again!!!

-Very, very Bad acting -Terrible music -No camera experience -No fantasy/inspiration what so ever

Now if it was a student film I would've been nicer, but the director is at least forty. C'Mon. I gave it one star out of ten, just for the poster. And that is being very generous.

This movie is so horribly produced, I don't even know where to begin. For starters, the cinematography looks like it was shot with an Iphone or 90's VHS camcorder. Poor composition and sound plague the movie from the start and it only gets worse. It is especially evident that little effort was expended on the production when the mic boom bobs into the lower portion of the frame during the scene where she initially wakes up in quarantine following her 'mysterious' survival of the spacecraft's return to Earth. As for the acting, it couldn't have been more unconvincing and disingenuous if the producers had picked random people off the street to portray the characters. In addition to the technical faults of this film, the story line and 'science' elements are poorly considered and show a complete lack of understanding of the actual science they are trying to convey. Overall, this 'film' is 1 hour and 41 minutes of mind-numbing absurdity. Unless you have 2 hours of your life that you would like to just toss away, don't waste your time on this atrocity. If I could give it a zero, I would.

Don't believe the ratings on IMDb until they have had a few weeks to get the REAL ones. The bad movies in particular, routinely have fake reviewers, most likely involved in the movie making somehow. This movie was not good. Another horrible audio score that is incessant, and overbearing....too loud, and never ending. The acting was not natural...half the dialogue was forced...like the actors didn't remember how to be human once they got in front of the camera. Other than that, it's a good story, just not very well presented. I have always hated when a really good story gets ruined by bad film makers.

The three stars is generous.

Begin (15 minutes) is OK , even if actors' acting comes straight from B movie type. Then it gets a bit chaotic and certainly not any better acting wise. Semi technology. Would be "interesting" actors talking science stuff that is all very obvious fake, so called technology. For me a waste of time.