Cézanne et moi

You wouldn't miss much if you watched this movie with the sound off. Some of the cinematography, especially of outdoor scenes in Provence, is just astoundingly beautiful. Some is very reminiscent of Le Château de ma mère and the scenes in la garrigue.

The acting is all fine. Guillaume Canet is a fine performer and does a good job, but he is not the seriously obese and not handsome man that the real Zola was.

The big problem here is the script. It starts with an imaginary meeting between Zola and Cézanne in 1888, two years after Zola permanently alienated the painter with his novel L'Oeuvre (The Great Work of Art). It then moves back and forth between the present and various scenes in the two men's past friendship. There is nothing wrong with that as a format, but the dialogue is way too stereotypical. If these men had been so pleasant, their friendship would not have come to an end. There is no real attempt to explore why Zola turned on the Impressionists, yet that is really the center of the story.

So, my recommendation would be to watch this with the sound off.

Well-made biographical drama is focused on the legends' complex and explosive friendship, with fully believable performances by Canet and Gallienne, and enhanced by Jean-Marie Dreujou's remarkable camerawork, but somehow neglects to explore or even explain the protagonists' importance in art and literature history.

Whew boy! Saw a really wonderful movie last night. It is entitled Cezanne et Moi. Yep, a French movie. Actually, it was a Bro-mance, but I absolutely could not tear my eyes off of it. It was a visual, feast for the eyes, and compliments to the Cinematographer. I don't know how he did it (I'm thinking some kinds of filters), but he was able to light his film with brilliant Cezanne blues and pink and rose colors. Which, btw, prevented me from being able to take the time to read the subtitles because I was so busy being dazzled by the kaliedoscopic colors. The result was similiar to mirroring the desired effect of the painters. The impressionists were madly trying to capture an image which was held in a particular moment during the day when sunlight evoked a particular feeling. So the brush was flying, causing the impressionistic feel and look. And someone, A HACKER, caused my computer to "go dark." Now, thank you, I have to watch it again. But I don't mind...really. You are going to love it, I saw many Manets, Monets, Degas, Cezannes, etc. when I went to the Palace of the Legion of Honor, a museum in San Francisco. Actually, when I got to the Dutch Masters, I fell in love with my favorite painting, Fishing under the Ice on the Maas. The scene takes place at daybreak, I think, where the colors evoke the same impressionistic feeling. Anyway, I will see it again. I won't say when though; I don't want my pc to go dark again. :)

This film is the story a friendship of Emile Zola and Paul Cézanne with its ups and downs: the meticulous writer of novels and the temperamental painter who has destryoed a lot of paintings.

I enjoyed this films for the description of this period of France: Emilie Zola was very criticized in this life and Paul Cézanne was finally accepted at the end of his life.

After this film I had the interest to read more about Emile Zola and Paul Cézanne and about their friendship.

I enjoyed the good performances of Guillaume Gallienne, Guillaume Canet, Alice Pol, Déborah François, Pierre Yvon, Sabine Azéma, Freya Mavor and Isabelle Candelier.

Cezanne and I directed and written by Danièle Thompson is a movie that should never have been. It's a pragmatic and artless movie about artists of the second half of the XIXth Century.

It is a movie without purpose, the writing is poor and disjointed, it constantly jumps between different points in time without any purpose, or structure or even memory as some scenes seem to happen two or even three times.

What you will enjoy from this movie:

• the name dropping of some of the biggest artists of modern times
• the scenery towards the end of the movie

What you won't enjoy and the movie gets wrong:

• the portrayal of every character as a completely antipathetic, there is not one likeable character in the whole movie, even those with minimal texts such as Renoir or Manet who only talk to hate in this movie.
• the movie itself is deceiving, it isn't a movie about Cezanne but about Zola
• the artistic portraying of Cezanne who, apparently drew 99% of his canvas as portrait! What a strange choice from the director.
• the complete lack of artistry through the whole movie, be it from the cinematography, the direction, the writing or even the paintings shown through the movie.

The director clearly had no clue about art so why make a film about art other than self-indulgence?

Avoid.