Killer Camera Monsters

I had to turn it off as soon as the PI showed. talk about overacting, he was horrible. I cannot describe just how bad this movie, weel the 20 minutes that I watched, Take heed, don't bother

Not so bad like others were saying depending on if it's what you're looking for.

... almost, but it took itself too seriously. Downfall. Had they melted it down into a smelly little swirl of pure absurdity, sprinkled with smatterings of downright goofiness, then it might have stood a better chance. The acting was bad enough that it could have worked. While the premise offered a broad field to plow, it could have been made delightfully campy, wonderfully stupid and pleasantly preposterous - no doubt it would have been more fun to experience, and had much broader appeal. As it stands - a tad boring.

Poor Adam has a photography problem. He fails to heed a warning about his camera is not supposed to be used under any artificial light. He soon figures out that he has the ability to create killer man eating monsters just by taking pictures of them.

This unfolds into a terribly badly acted , horribly written, umm.....movie?? Is that what this is? Anyway, whatever resulted, it's terrible.

And Nope, I couldn't stand it. Turned it off with 24 minutes left. Horrible.

Slowest movie ever made. Everyone has a pseudo-Russian accent which makes me wonder where the financing came from.

This plot is simple and needs no explanation -- just read the film's title.

The problem with this movie -- besides the horrible script, poor direction and lack of suitable acting skills is that it is slower than molasses. If the camera doesnt kill you, the pace will.