Hunters

After watching the pilot for "Hunters", I was disappointed. Although it is not unusual for a show to start quickly, hoping to catch the interest of viewers from the start, that strategy is difficult to pull off, requiring clarity. The audience must know what is happening, even if it doesn't yet understand all the intentions of the characters. And viewers should be given a character (or two) they can identify with.

"Hunters" is a failure of style and story. The action is dark, full of shadows that obscure identities. This method can create mystery, but the viewer should at least know what the mystery is. When he is given little or no context, the first episode is only a collection of actions to be remembered, in hopes of later understanding.

The story seems implausible. There is a troubled FBI agent, Flynn (Nathan Phillips), who lives with a wife we barely see and a former partner's daughter who is also troubled. There is a shadow organization that tracks down undefined entities that belong to another shadow organization with unknown goals. For some reason, all of these entities converge, Flynn is told he now works for the first organization, and people start chasing each other.

Flynn receives no indoctrination or training. He is never read in regarding his new employer's objectives or its history. And neither are we.

Usually, good scripts don't have the characters explain everything that happens; they just show us. But some exposition through dialogue is necessary if a backstory is not provided through flashbacks.

Perhaps later episodes can clean up the mess that the pilot lays at viewers' feet. And maybe other viewers are willing to wait for the framework that is missing. Personally, I am not motivated to wait, particularly because none of the characters intrigue me.

I give it a 5 because it has potential BUT this is what's wrong with SciFi today. Maybe it's just the perception that some of the British or Australian directors,writers etc that audiences are stupid/ignorant of the real world or maybe they are themselves.

Here's what I mean, no one in this day and age over the age of 10 thinks a CRACK secret organization sends 3 guys into a bldg to search for dangerous aliens/monsters or bad guys.

OR if you do the guys are THE bad asses of the world. Not 3 guys who wander in , lose track of each other , disobey orders or carry radios that don't have earpieces and throat mikes so the baddies don't hear you or basically run around like idiots and get themselves killed.

Now I know some may say well that was just a device so we can set up that he loves her or she lost a loved one or whatever BUT! if you don't get the little things right then no matter how good you do the biggies you only be mediocre, hire a military consultant for Pete's sake.

And I will give this a few more looks but as of now that's what it is mediocre MTV scifi show.

Wow that was long winded for me but I had high hopes for this one and they just aren't up to snuff the acting's not that good and the script is not THAT well done, they throw in a little gore for shock value and it's done poorly and not really needed if the show was done well. Well nuff said , hope they correct this one but it feels kinda like an overseas copy of a really good American show. Sorry guys but you know USA makes the most entertaining movies and shows... we just make them in Canada now LOL

Hunters offers up a clumsy start, to a series that, so far, fails to inspire.

The show taps into the shadow government organization hunting aliens stick. Its hardly original but that's OK. What's not OK is the poorly constructed storyline and characterizations.

Its story never really makes clear whats happening or why. You get vague pieces of information, combined with showy scenes of amongst other things, the done to death, alien autopsy. Perhaps this is intended to intrigue the viewer? The reality is, it simply confuses.

The characterizations are hardly impressive either. They feel flat and lifeless. There's no strong emotion, clarity of purpose or real connection built between the key characters. This includes those who are romantically involved. As a consequence the key players are, for the most part, rendered uninteresting and dismissable.

For myself, there is little to like here. I was genuinely bored by the first episode and doubt, I'll be taking this one any further. Three out of ten from me.

Episode 1 was quite a failure in presenting the series properly. Too much of action and too little plot. Unfortunately I didn't continue the series based on the poor first episode, but I got curious by the latest episode 04 due to boredom and after watching it I was kinda hooked and played all the episodes in reverse to get the whole story. The main unit characters (3) are the most interesting part in the whole series due to their changing relationship with each other (hate/curiosity/confusion). I smell a possible alien/ human relationship coming...hopefully. There is one thing especially which is still bugging me and it is the main female character (who should be the lead) who is pictured to be quite strong because she's alien, has violent/ sexual urges etc but in every fight she has been in, she loses or somehow the suspect escapes. WTF? She should kick some serious ass. Make her more Domina, scary in a sexy way.

This show started off with action from the first episode. I don't know why people seem so disturb by this. Many movies have started this way, then go back and fill in the details. So yeah, I may not have understood everything that was going on but it was intriguing enough to keep me watching to want to know more. And I didn't feel lost or confused. I think it is a very interesting storyline which they are developing at a decent pace. Now that we are a couple of episodes in the storyline and relationships are developing nicely. For me, it is a nice change from the "baby" and "corny" sci-fi that has taken over the last few years. Hope it continues...would love to see where this one goes.