Noël dans les montagnes

I can't be the only one waiting for a kiss happen. I guess this was one of an inspirational type of film rather than a romance. I was just waiting for more to happen.

"Christmas in the Smokies" has a different enough twist on the usual romantic holiday season films. The plot idea was a good one, and it has the scenery to make a very good film. But there are too many shortcomings with this one. The most obvious is the weak screenplay. It really needed to flesh out the background much more and better, especially of Mason Wyatt's lifestyle and change when he achieved the spotlight as a country Western singing star.

Here's a story about a late teenage couple who had a sudden split, and now they come back together about 15 years later. The portrayal in the film of Mason is all a good guy, a little sorry for his past, and with a sense of humor, but having grown up. In contrast, Shelby Haygood still carries her hurt all these years later. And all the film shows of this is a very brief shot of a young girl looking forlorn as the movie opens. There was real drama and hurt in that relationship, which the script just passes over except for Shelby's dour portrayal.

And to the very end, there is really no sign of chemistry between these two characters. So, the acting doesn't really fit the circumstances of a real life situation.

The best thing about this film is the portrayal of Shelby's parents. Rebecca Koon play's Annie Haygood and Barry Corbin plays Wade Haygood. Corbin's character adds some nice humor to the story, and a bit of senior wisdom in places. He plays the role very at ease and comfortably. But, even with the good scenery on top of that, the loose, hole-filed script and poor screenplay relegate this to just another so-so holiday film. Without Corbin and the scenery, it would be quite boring and probably not hold the attention of many viewers.

Here are the best lines in this film, both by Corbin's "pop."

Wade Haygood, to Mason Wyatt on his return, "Those first years - burnin' all those photographs sure did keep the house warm."

Wade Haygood, to Shelby, "You know, it ain't baggage if you don't carry it around."

Am not giving 'Christmas in the Smokies' a low rating or negative review out of maliciousness or prejudice. Although the story sounded very tried and tested (by a few years after this it was a concept that became done to death) with not much to it, Sarah Lancaster is often watchable and Christmas has always been very special to me and my family. So actually there was some potential in it. Hardly a film doomed from the get go, very few films in existence are like that.

'Christmas in the Smokies' just completely failed to deliver in nearly every area. There are redeeming merits, sadly over-shadowed by the many big flaws. Is it a complete waste of time? No, and it takes a lot for me to call anything that and has done so for quite some time. Some films do have less than promising concepts but actually do manage to execute it in a far more engaging way than one would think. 'Christmas in the Smokies' does not do that.

Lancaster is an appealing lead and is expressive and easy to like as the one halfway interesting character in the whole film. Barry Corbin is decent too.

The film looks quite nice, lovely scenery and well shot.

Everything else however is done rather badly. While the supporting cast are not terrible, nobody stands out as memorable or identifiable. What is the point too of having Jill Wagner in the film and give her practically nothing to work with. The characters are shallow cliches and nothing more, with no real development to them. The central relationship is both underdeveloped and rushed with no conflict or growth, it also lacks spark and at times looks awkward. The music can be intrusive and too schmaltzy sounding and the direction is at best workmanlike.

Regarding the story, there is practically nothing to it. It is very dull due to having a wafer thin story that is over-stretched and does absolutely nothing new with over-familiar material. Add to that a leaden pace and no charm, heart or any discernible tension (everything seemed too neat), and one has a very dull and bland story and film that resolves too easily and obviously.

Overall, not a waste but not recommended. 3/10

What else do you need in a movie than to watch Sarah Lancaster. Has much better acting than most TV Christmas movies.

They writers don't know how to write a leading female character. Also she's a business owner and doesn't know anything about her finances or even how much she owes on her 2 mortgages?? What? She's poorly written and really unlikable

Her farm is in danger because she doesn't make money and is in a ton of debt and the old man who is the villain of the story wants to buy it to develop it in a way that benefits the town. They have a town meeting and she's the only one who doesn't want that and talks about how much she cares about the land and the town people but we never see that ever, and the villain doesn't want to develop the natural beauty of the mountains.

She can't save her farm from foreclosure and has to grovel to her famous musician ex-boyfriend ( who she's only been shown hating) to help her raise the money. The main guy is fine I guess, he has no real personality to speak of and I don't get why he likes someone who charges him $5,000 to sleep in her barn. She only softens after he saves her farm for her and they dance together on Christmas and that's how it ends. Her parents are the only real characters and they don't make up for the boring leads.

Great to watch and make fun of.