Falling Water

The show is about 3 strangers who are all subconsciously connected through their dreams. The characters are a mother who is looking for her lost child, whom she is told by the hospital doesn't exist, a man looking for his missing girlfriend & a detective trying to cure his catatonic mother.

The directing is great, it plays out like a movie. Fortuately it does not resemble Inception, except for the fact the the theme revolves around dreams & the subconscious. The acting is also good too, especially by one of the leads, Lizzy Brochere who plays Tess.

This seems like one of those shows that will be a long mini-series, or play out like an extended movie, because it's difficult to see how the plot can carry out more than 1 or 2 seasons without the mysteries being resolved. It's a unique plot and very entertaining to watch. The pilot already had a few twists!

I'd be interested in to know the backstory on why the critics have taken such a negative view of this series right off the bat. The Rotten Tomatoes consensus (dating from the very first episode) is "Falling Water attempts complexity and intrigue but churns out an unimaginative concept lacking a redeemable payoff."

The fact is the concept is highly original--I have spent my life reading and viewing science-fiction and have never come across this theme before. And how can they possibly know that it is "lacking a redeemable payoff"?

Is it possible that these reviewers receive a whole series plot development along with the copy of the first episode? I mean, if they know how the series develops and,for that reason, they know it is a dud, this should be acknowledged up-front somewhere.

After episode 10, 'Falling Water' left me with not much more insight to the purpose of the story than after the first episode. This might be the reason why so many people do not like it. Most parts of the story are revealed in the pilot, or at least whereto it would go in the following episodes, but after that we do not learn much more, despite we want to.

The final episode gives a bit more 'Action' and a nice trial-and-error-loop, but in the end, it's not that satisfying.

The dream world is not much disturbing or frightening, it's a very finite space like an expanded mirror of our world, which is, at least for me, far not enough to impress. And with that I do not mean visuals like in 'Inception', but in a dream you can change location and time like, say, from beyond creation of earth to your classroom to a cave on the solid center of Uranus. But that would be more a Doctor Who thing. I liked 'Falling Water' for its style, for the slow pacing, and of course for David Ajala's character Burton, but once I realized that the story struggles with it's purpose, I lost a bigger part of my interest.

That may have happened even earlier to people who are not as patient as me (and I think I am very patient).

Whereby the show has (or should have) much potential. There is dream mysticism, modern technique, conspiracy, a cult, shady characters with unclear intents, fight of the minds, floating borders between reality and dreamscape, a set of good actors, and much more ingredients that could make it outstanding. A great deal of action is not really needed for that, watch season one of 'Mr. Robot', or 'The Leftovers'.

Sadly, many promises (at least those from the trailers) are not fulfilled. The show starts to "tread water" early, loses its grip and therewith its audience.

I hope really for a second (and better) season, which is not clear by now (12/2016) if it will happen.

Edit (01/2018): It got a second season which runs now. Let's hope for better scripts this time.

Although it's eerily hard to follow, a mind boggler, the actors are very good, especially David Ajala (sexy). I am watching it for the second time so it is definitely worth it.

So I am watching season 1 am now on episode 5 and to be honest I am no wiser on what is going on than I was 4 episodes ago? I neither understand connections in reality to the main characters or that in dreams and sometimes I am at a loss as to which is dream v reality?

In a previous review sombody compared this show to Sense8 and advised the viewer to watch that instead. Not sure I agree on the comparison however I totally agree that it is a far superior show and addictive sadly cut short of its full potential by the networks non renewing.

Being a masocist I will most likely continue watching this show in the hope that at some stage the story will fall into some coherence at which point I would most probably rewatch it to realise what I missed from the beginning and add things together. Unless it never happens then I will be angry at the wasted time I spent on such trash. At the moment it's heading in that direction sadly.,

Ok I am now on season 2 after prevailing and I have been able to know understand mostly the story which has improved my viewing experience a lot hence I have increased my rating to a 7 if the first season had been more explicit in script/storyline I would have given a 8 so prevail it Defo got better and more enjoyable

OMG how annoying to prevail through 2 seasons and they cancel the show before any answers or conclusions are revealed!! I have just watched the last episode of season 2 left on a pretty large cliffhanger and now I feel robbed would have been better if they had cancelled it after season 1 than allow another season! DAM NETWORKS!