Rock, Paper, Scissors

I just wanna look and fiddle a little bit. Fiddle and touch.

Every year there's such a film of which you say "Man, this is probably the worst film I've seen this year!". For me, it's the movie "Rock, Paper, Scissors" that takes all the glory. With Tom Holland as director (who nevertheless brought some great films such as "Fright Night" and "Child's Play") and screenwriter Victor "Friday the 13th" Miller on board, you expect a horror of a considerable level. Take some good advice from me. Don't start watching it with too high expectations, because you'll be disappointed. Not only is the story fairly unoriginal. The acting generally sucks. And it's never really exciting or scary. Even the slasher elements are extremely boring.

But the most important thing is the part of the serial killer. Think of Hannibal Lecter in "The Silence of the Lambs" or Patrick Bateman in "American Psycho". These guys were real serial killers who made an impression. From the beginning, you had that feeling that these crazy persons were sadistic, morbid individuals. Peter "The Doll Maker" Harris (Luke Macfarlane) shows bouts of madness and pure evilness. But in general, he just looks like a pathetic person who reminded me more of "Pee-Wee Herman". It was only during the scarce moments while he relived his traumatic childhood, which he spent with Uncle Charles (John Dugan), that Macfarlane acted convincingly. The fear and torment that took hold of him while remembering the abuse, was shown in a masterful way. But for the rest, it was just a sad performance.

The most annoying characters, however, were reserved for Michael Madsen and Jennifer Titus. What's an actor like Madsen doing in this pulp film anyway? It was a mystery to me. Seeing him at work in Tarantino's films "The Hateful Eight", "Reservoir Dogs" and "Kill Bill", assumes that this actor will get better offers. With a face that has character and that raw voice. As Detective Dechert he seemed to play on autopilot. The character Ashley, played by Jennifer Titus, is even less credible. Her motive is understandable but the way she approaches it is so amateurish and clumsy. Anyway, when I saw her awkward and stiff Karate movements at the denouement, I wondered how the hell she got that black belt. Sadly enough, the rest of the cast was also of a low level.

But the most annoying thing was the predictable story. First, the release of Peter Harris. Who the hell releases a serial killer after a few years? An insane person who killed 13 teenage girls and blames an imaginary twin brother. So, after a few years of shock therapy and meaningful conversations with psychologist Dr. Bauer (Tatum O'Neal), the latter comes to the conclusion that Peter is freed from his inner demons and is ready to function as a normal person in society. Someone like Dr. Bauer would be taken away in a straitjacket immediately nowadays. A few hours in the parental home and a glance at the cheery buttocks of a cheerleader (who, in all innocence, bends over, in such a way that he could admire her minuscule panty with fringes) is enough for our cured and reformed maniac to run back into his basement to restart his ceased activities. Complete nuts.

All in all, a dreadful movie. Annoying acting. A ridiculous, clichéd story. And even the gory and bloody parts made no impression. You have to be a huge fan of Tom Holland to see this as a successful horror. I hope there won't be a sequel somewhere in the near future. Because I'm certain it'll be more of the same. Perhaps Tic-Tac-Toe will be used as the morbid game. May the God of feature films spare me!

If you're wondering how this movie has anything over a 2-star rating, you're not alone-unless, of course, those reviews are funded. From start to finish, the film delivers a cascade of cringe-worthy acting and plot holes that defy all logic. By the 37-minute mark, I found myself baffled: how could anyone buy into a story where a man who has killed thirteen people is freely walking around? The only marginally redeeming factor is Michael Madsen's performance, but even he's saddled with a character that's hard to take seriously.

Ultimately, if you need background noise while scrolling your phone, this movie fits the bill. But if you're looking for something with actual intrigue, a cohesive storyline, or actors who appear to care, skip this one entirely. The only thing it may keep you engaged in is wondering how it was ever greenlit.

Awesome lower budget indie horror film with great picture and sound brought to you by one of indie horror's classic greats, Tom Holland. Fast paced and innovative, filled with ideas and although its an over told story, there's plenty of creativity here because honestly an idea could be done to death but each director brings thier own flavor and spice so it makes each film unique. Rock, paper, scissors is complex, fun, twisty, and quite creepy. The acting is good and it's quite a bang for Holland who proves that after all these years he's still got it. Much better than one might think at first glance. The imdb rating of 4.6 is one of the few ratings on this site I actually disagree with. It should be rated somewhere between like 5.2 and 5.5

I expected better but overall another horror film that could have used a better script. Story and acting worked okay. Holland is still a brilliant director.

It is a disaster, very bad acting, very bad camera scenes,very bad movie effects, very bad everything. The voters are probably their friends and neighbors, because u can´t vote more than 2 if u are person with the normal taste for movies.