[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
IMDbPro

Arcadia

  • 2016
  • 1h 30m
IMDb RATING
4.2/10
347
YOUR RATING
Arcadia (2016)
One man fights to give his family a future in a world crippled by disease where medical care is controlled by a totalitarian regime.
Play trailer1:34
1 Video
6 Photos
ActionSci-FiThriller

One man fights to give his family a future in a world crippled by disease where medical care is controlled by a totalitarian regime.One man fights to give his family a future in a world crippled by disease where medical care is controlled by a totalitarian regime.One man fights to give his family a future in a world crippled by disease where medical care is controlled by a totalitarian regime.

  • Director
    • Tom Large
  • Writer
    • Tom Large
  • Stars
    • Thomas Coombes
    • Akie Kotabe
    • Sid Phoenix
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    4.2/10
    347
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • Tom Large
    • Writer
      • Tom Large
    • Stars
      • Thomas Coombes
      • Akie Kotabe
      • Sid Phoenix
    • 14User reviews
    • 4Critic reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • Videos1

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 1:34
    Official Trailer

    Photos5

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster

    Top cast18

    Edit
    Thomas Coombes
    Thomas Coombes
    • Jerry
    Akie Kotabe
    Akie Kotabe
    • Jacob
    Sid Phoenix
    Sid Phoenix
    • Giles
    Marc Baylis
    Marc Baylis
    • Charlie
    Rufus Wright
    Rufus Wright
    • Ryder
    Gillian MacGregor
    Gillian MacGregor
    • Marianna Black
    Laurence Saunders
    Laurence Saunders
    • Rory
    • (voice)
    Steve Weston
    • Ray
    Simeon Willis
    Simeon Willis
    • Nigel
    Alice E. Mayer
    • Grace
    Sam Lyon-Behan
    • Ben
    • (as Sam Behan)
    Joseph Baker
    • Adam
    Adele Keating
    • Abigail
    Anthony Houghton
    • James
    Richard J. Danum
    • Harry
    Charlie Rendle
    • Dan
    Mary Holder
    • Laura
    Holly Kibble
    • Emma
    • Director
      • Tom Large
    • Writer
      • Tom Large
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews14

    4.2347
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    5dave-70421

    Neither bad or good

    Well more an OK film and a 5 from me.

    The best part of this film for me was the script and overall story. As the script and story itself was very good, certainly deserving of a far bigger budget and better design and location shooting.

    I'm not going to analyze the film scene by scene as clearly there is script padding. But it's a reasonable and thought provoking realistic vision on how some may well eventually envisage the future of mankind in a way in the future when population numbers may well start to outstrip resources to feed it. Conspiracy theorists will say this will happen in the future to try and control the population.

    Acting was OK, certainly a miss match of acting abilities between some of the actors (maybe reasons for that as seemed a rushed production at times). Sadly production values, well more the budget was seriously lacking with this film. And what could have been more a 7 out of 10 for me is sadly a more realistic 5.
    8payasoingenioso

    This 2016 Film Predicted 2019 Fears

    This movie was solid.

    I do not understand the low reviews.

    The plot is sound, even with the deep politics. The acting is decent. The dialogue is not bad.

    This film relates well to COVID-19 at its worst; so, I figure the reviews would be great from US Republicans and Democrats.
    3kelandry-27735

    Could have been good... but it's not.

    The concept behind the movie is one that's been done many times. It's easy to make it interesting and exciting. And yet this movie still failed. The characters and setting is flat and underdeveloped. And the ending is just... bad.

    The biggest problem is the first hour or so is just bland and boring. We get a brief introduction to the main character and one person he cares about for a couple minutes and then it skips ahead six years and we're left to figure out what happened on our own through clues. Basically the whole movie relies on the idea that you already know and care about these characters and their situation... except you don't. And they aren't interesting. The only interesting characters are side characters... and they aren't that interesting either.

    But I digress. After an hour of nothing really, the movie picks up a little. But then we have these two major events happen that could lead to some interesting things. At the very least we should get a glimpse of what happens after to the main character and society. But we don't. We get a very confusing scene of a woman watering plants for about a minute and it's over. There's no conclusion. It feels like the end of the first episode to a series where there is supposed to be so much more and this was just the introduction. Except it's not. It's a movie. And there should be more.

    Basically, it feels like they just ran out of actors and money and time and ... everything? So they just shot this and decided that was good enough to put out.

    The concept isn't bad. But unless you like sitting for a hour of boredom before getting somewhere and then not even getting an ending, it's not worth it. I'd probably be giving it one star except I'm a bit of a sucker for the concept and I did manage to watch the whole thing... But it's not good. Wasted potential.
    9plasmapilot

    A GOOD LOOK @ THE NEW WORLD ORDER

    People who view this as fiction are drinking fluoridated H2O & are sedated into believing that everything is fine! Wakeup....either pay attention & learn something or simply enjoy an entertaining film. Similar scenarios are already happening & depicted here in a well written script. If you don't believe at least know that this film is fascinating & fun to view! I really enjoyed watching this movie but it scared me as well!
    3SnoopyStyle

    needs more work

    In the future, a disease has spread around the world which leaves people dead upon reaching forty. After the chaos of wars and governmental collapses, a new totalitarian regime has risen in London which only offers a cure to its people inside the safe city of Arcadia. There is a lottery to allow people into Arcadia. Charlie works for Arcadia and is desperate to gain entry for himself and his daughter. He is assigned to capture Adam Black, a member of resistance movement 'Free Care'.

    This is a British low budget sci-fi indie with some simple effects. This is mostly filmed in what looks like suburban homes and in the woods. It makes the high tech sci-fi story stall. It doesn't help with the sound quality either. The acting is best described as functional amateurism. The most important aspect is the premise of the movie. The writers are obviously trying to say something about health care. It's trying to be a high-concept sci-fi but the concept needs some more work. It doesn't really get pass a secondary questioning. If Arcadia actually exists, the world would be at its door either threatening it or begging for it to share the cure. This movie construction is simply not built properly. It's a step above film school but a big step below good festival material.

    More like this

    Arcadia
    6.9
    Arcadia
    Arcadia
    7.3
    Arcadia
    Arcadia
    6.2
    Arcadia
    Arcadia
    6.4
    Arcadia
    Division 19
    3.5
    Division 19
    Arcadia
    Arcadia
    Scare Campaign
    5.8
    Scare Campaign
    Else
    5.5
    Else
    La colonie
    5.4
    La colonie
    Arcadian
    5.5
    Arcadian

    Storyline

    Edit

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • October 24, 2016 (United Kingdom)
    • Country of origin
      • United Kingdom
    • Official site
      • Official site
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • Vultures
    • Production companies
      • Bigview Media
      • Bigview
      • Material Masters
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      1 hour 30 minutes
    • Color
      • Color
    • Aspect ratio
      • 2.39:1

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.