IMDb RATING
5.1/10
9.9K
YOUR RATING
When Nicole comes in contact with Father Anton (Corneliu Ulici) more and more inexplicable events occur. The pair begin to believe that the priest lost the battle with a demon.When Nicole comes in contact with Father Anton (Corneliu Ulici) more and more inexplicable events occur. The pair begin to believe that the priest lost the battle with a demon.When Nicole comes in contact with Father Anton (Corneliu Ulici) more and more inexplicable events occur. The pair begin to believe that the priest lost the battle with a demon.
Florian Voicu
- Tavian
- (as Florian Constantin Voicu)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I decided to watch this film because I was attracted to the fact that it was based on a true story and that it is connected to Romania, which is very close to my city.
Anyway, the film is quite good. The rating of 5 here really does not reflect the overall experience.
I would give 10 for the setting, the interiors ( especially the room of the possessed girl and the churches and all the rooms ) as they have that 'something' that really stands out.
The acting of all the actors, except the main actress is really good. The main reporter girl is kinda too ... hasty and there was something about her abrupt ways that did not click with me. Maybe she was meant to be like that.
The last ( 2nd exorcism) was kinda non believable while the 1st one was on point.
I am not 100% sure if they filmed all in Romania but it looked that way and that gave extra + to the story.
My rating is 8. The film was entertaining and interesting 99% of the time.
Anyway, the film is quite good. The rating of 5 here really does not reflect the overall experience.
I would give 10 for the setting, the interiors ( especially the room of the possessed girl and the churches and all the rooms ) as they have that 'something' that really stands out.
The acting of all the actors, except the main actress is really good. The main reporter girl is kinda too ... hasty and there was something about her abrupt ways that did not click with me. Maybe she was meant to be like that.
The last ( 2nd exorcism) was kinda non believable while the 1st one was on point.
I am not 100% sure if they filmed all in Romania but it looked that way and that gave extra + to the story.
My rating is 8. The film was entertaining and interesting 99% of the time.
Had seen the trailer n was looking forward to it. My curiosity n excitement doubled after i came to kno that its directed by Xavier Glens. I am surprised that after making such a brutal n atmospheric film, Frontiere(s), what made Glens create such a slow n tame film.
Saw this on a rented dvd. It is a beautifully shot film. The Romanian country side was pleasant but the overall film was a disappointment. Firstly, the film was unoriginal, stale n not scary enuff for horror fans. Its more like an investigative mystery drama but predictable. U can call it poor mans Exorcism of Emily Rose.
Forget the blood, nudity or sex, the story was dull, the tension was zero n the character development nada. In the trailer v get to see spiders in the crotch which was scary but the real scene in the film is meh. Also, in the trailer v get to see the needle scene which was again scary but the scene in the movie was a blink n a miss.
I can't really tell how I feel about this movie.
On the one hand it tries to be a remake of The Exorcism of Emily Rose, and they shouldn't try that. That one was a masterpiece.
Secondly, they shoot the Romania scenes in Transylvania, the actual events took place in Moldova.
This is like shooting a western in Manhattan.
Then, they portray Romania in general to be like in the 1800s. It reminded me of the Amish.
Of course, even in villages, Romanians don't live like that.
They didn't use Romanians to play the roles, so the acvent of some of them when they speak Romanian are devastating.
The acting overall is average, but not as bad as some say here
What the hell is this crap? What happened here?
This is so by the numbers, so bland, so boring. Check it out: every single jump scare in this movie, which is pretty much every single "scare", is accomplished with an ear piercingly loud sound. Seriously. Every time. A car horn. A dogs bark. A bang on a door. And the sound is so ridiculously loud, while the talking is super low. Man I was just so effing angry. It pains your ears. And the sound is not even accompanied by scary imagery! Most of the times it's just a fake scare. With SUCH loud noise. JEEEZ.
The best thing about the movie is Sophie Cookson. She does the best she can with a very uninteresting and boring script. There is very little gore, the little there is is OK. There are a couple of effects, they also work. But all in all it's just very tame. The story, I think, leans on being "true". Unfortunately it's still boring.
I should probably give this a lower score, but if my mood were better I think I might have enjoyed it more. Also, the movie does have some qualities, it's just all to by the numbers.
This is so by the numbers, so bland, so boring. Check it out: every single jump scare in this movie, which is pretty much every single "scare", is accomplished with an ear piercingly loud sound. Seriously. Every time. A car horn. A dogs bark. A bang on a door. And the sound is so ridiculously loud, while the talking is super low. Man I was just so effing angry. It pains your ears. And the sound is not even accompanied by scary imagery! Most of the times it's just a fake scare. With SUCH loud noise. JEEEZ.
The best thing about the movie is Sophie Cookson. She does the best she can with a very uninteresting and boring script. There is very little gore, the little there is is OK. There are a couple of effects, they also work. But all in all it's just very tame. The story, I think, leans on being "true". Unfortunately it's still boring.
I should probably give this a lower score, but if my mood were better I think I might have enjoyed it more. Also, the movie does have some qualities, it's just all to by the numbers.
Not the most exciting film, it's a horror mystery, that's more mystery than horror and the mystery was not that interesting. It was about a faithless journalist trying to prove God is not real by doing a story about a Priest in jail for murder because an exorcism went wrong. Sounds like a good story. The setting of the movie also seemed good as it takes place in Romania, during a holiday that, according to the film is similar to Halloween, and when I herd this at the beginning of the film I was jazzed to watch a Halloween picture during the season. The Crucifixion shows a lot of elements of mystery and sexuality that makes if feel like a homage of Hammer Horror, but it falls a little short from become a classic of even a cult classic, real short.
Did you know
- TriviaInsipred by the alleged true story of the Tanacu Exorcism, that happened in 2005, in Romania.
- GoofsAt 51:02 the female lead is awoken by a noise and her night shirt is open, exposing part of her breast. The camera angle switches to the door and back, but at 51:07, her shirt is clearly buttoned all the way up.
- ConnectionsReferenced in Minty Comedic Arts: 10 Things You Didn't Know About RAD (2021)
- How long is The Crucifixion?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Crucifixión
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $6,554,322
- Runtime1 hour 30 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content