IMDb RATING
3.6/10
1.3K
YOUR RATING
A mysterious stranger travels to a remote village where, 15 years earlier, his wife and daughter were kidnapped.A mysterious stranger travels to a remote village where, 15 years earlier, his wife and daughter were kidnapped.A mysterious stranger travels to a remote village where, 15 years earlier, his wife and daughter were kidnapped.
Featured reviews
Students cast that is all I can say, wasted time. I really hated the way movie ended.
Dolph Lundgreen has the looks. He has the skills. And he has had a lot of opportunities to go big, playing parts in big productions.
Then why does he do these amateur movies? He's obviously the only trained actor - the rest are extras with no acting skills. The filmography is just as ridiculous as the score, and it's evident that no real writer was attached.
This is not even at par with film school projects, and Dolph is not getting younger.
I would love to see him play the lead in an adaption of just about any Robert Ludlum film adaptation.
Then why does he do these amateur movies? He's obviously the only trained actor - the rest are extras with no acting skills. The filmography is just as ridiculous as the score, and it's evident that no real writer was attached.
This is not even at par with film school projects, and Dolph is not getting younger.
I would love to see him play the lead in an adaption of just about any Robert Ludlum film adaptation.
Yes that is a pun. But in case you are wondering why Dolph Lundgren is in a movie like this: it's because he has to pay his bills. Medical and otherwise - and this does that. Not to mention that he gets to travel to a country he may not have been in or just enjoy one he has gone before.
I really like Dolph and I have seen worse movies (some of them starring Steven Seagal, who some may compare to Dolph, rightly or not). But I really felt sorry for him in a couple of scenes. He has a certain age and some of the longer shots are not flattering at all. He is not at the point where it looks like slow motion when he runs, but he is not the fastest on his feet anymore either.
Anyway, the action is ok and if you are a fan of his, the paper thin story won't really matter either. Other than that, there is some italian if that is helping the case of the movie - so up to you to decide what you'll make of this.
I really like Dolph and I have seen worse movies (some of them starring Steven Seagal, who some may compare to Dolph, rightly or not). But I really felt sorry for him in a couple of scenes. He has a certain age and some of the longer shots are not flattering at all. He is not at the point where it looks like slow motion when he runs, but he is not the fastest on his feet anymore either.
Anyway, the action is ok and if you are a fan of his, the paper thin story won't really matter either. Other than that, there is some italian if that is helping the case of the movie - so up to you to decide what you'll make of this.
Yes I've seen better movies but believe me I've seen a lot worse. There's not as much action in this one and I blame the movie's director for the lack of action sequences. A tight budget didn't help things.
All in all, it's Dolph and he's always fun to watch. The man is a MIT grad in Chemical Engineering amongst other similar achievements. Huge breakthroughs for Dolph came in the form of "the EXPENDABLES"1. 2 & 3 . Dolph is now an actor and a damn good one at that.
I truly believe that Dolph''s big role is yet to come. He'd be very good in the right comedy. He always cracks me up.
All in all, it's Dolph and he's always fun to watch. The man is a MIT grad in Chemical Engineering amongst other similar achievements. Huge breakthroughs for Dolph came in the form of "the EXPENDABLES"1. 2 & 3 . Dolph is now an actor and a damn good one at that.
I truly believe that Dolph''s big role is yet to come. He'd be very good in the right comedy. He always cracks me up.
Similar idea to Taken of Liam Neeson. Basically revenge, child, corruption, taking things into own hands, saving somebody. Meaning good idea or topic, and story. But bad colors, resolution, recording, acting, details, quality, and almost everything. There is too much dark colors, to little things to see because most is recorded from the close up, not showing us greater picture of the environment. Also not good intro, explanation, and outro. Also did not like that there was too much foreign language which makes it difficult or impossible to understand. Bit adventurous and emotional. But still too old. Overally I am not satisfied. I expected better explanation, intro, and more daylight and colors.
Did you know
- TriviaMarco Mazzoli (who plays Antonio Graziani) is the host of Italy's #1 radio show (Lo Zoo di 105).
- GoofsThe young Hakensson is left eye dominant when shooting, Dolph is right eye dominant.
- Alternate versionsThe version premiered in Japan (95 minutes) runs 8 minutes longer than the US-released cut (87 min).
- How long is The Tracker?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime1 hour 35 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content