Twin Peaks: The Return

If you're not a fan of David Lynch then you're not going to like this show. End of story. Unless you've watched and loved Lynch's movies like Eraserhead, Blue Velvet, Wild at Heart, Lost Highway, Mulholland Drive and Inland Empire, then you're not going to like The Return. This is hardcore Lynch, challenging for even his biggest fans. I wouldn't call The Return a sequel to the original Twin Peaks. It's more a sequel to Fire Walk With Me than anything else, with a few elements of Twin Peaks sprinkled in. So, if you're just a fan of the original Twin Peaks and you're not familiar with Lynch's work, then The Return is not for you. You're not going to like it, I can assure you of that.

This is ARTHOUSE TV. It's not a murder mystery like the original. It's a hardcore surrealist midnight movie style psychological horror. And while I love it because of that, I can see why some people hate it.

I can't quite gather all my feelings and emotions and put them into words, but simply put: I have an emotional connection to Twin Peaks.

First things first - if you asked me, "What is art to you?" my answer would be Wajdi Mouawad or Peter Brook's plays, cinematic visions like Mulholland drive or 2001 : a space odyssey , Dostoevsky's novels, or Mozart's music. I would never mention a TV show.

Then came Twin Peaks: The Return - and now, I consider a series to be one of the finest pieces of art I've ever experienced, perhaps even surpassing many cinematic works. David Lynch reached the peak of creativity with this.

I started watching it nearly a year ago, and for me, Twin Peaks became a companion through my lonely days and nights. Every character felt like a family member over these months, and I'll never forget any of them.

Maybe it's the finale that shook me the most - it disturbed me in a way I wasn't prepared for. I felt confused, even a little lost. But that confusion is exactly what makes it so unforgettable. It's haunting because it refuses to give you closure. It forces you to sit with questions that don't have easy answers - questions about identity, time, reality, and whether we can ever truly go back to anything. The whole season slowly unravels into something deeply existential, and by the end, I realized Lynch never intended to comfort us. He never offers answers - he just holds up a mirror and dares us to look. That, to me, is what makes The Return so profound.

When I watched Twin Peaks: The Return, I felt like I was witnessing a director working at the absolute height of his creative freedom. David Lynch didn't just make a sequel - he made a statement. This wasn't about fan service or wrapping things up neatly. It was about transforming the medium itself, about what television could be if it weren't bound by convention. I genuinely believe there's no other show like it. The Return is something closer to a moving painting, or maybe a dream you keep having but can never fully understand.

What makes Lynch's directing style so brilliant - and so frustrating to some - is that he embraces ambiguity. He isn't concerned with clarity. He chooses to focus on mood, texture, and raw emotion. There's a confidence in the way he holds on a shot just long enough to make you uncomfortable, or lets silence fill a room until it becomes its own character. He doesn't spoon-feed you anything. And somehow, it works.

Visually, The Return is stunning. He uses darkness like no one else. Shadows dominate scenes - both literally and metaphorically. And when there is light, it's often cold and surreal, or violently artificial, like the flickering neon in the Bang Bang Bar. His framing is deliberate, almost painterly, with so much attention given to the awkwardness of space and distance between people. It all adds to the unease. Even the digital cinematography, which some might find jarring at first, feels like a deliberate choice - a way to show the world through a warped lens, to blur reality with fiction.

Narratively, The Return is a maze. Lynch completely subverts the idea of nostalgia or resolution. Instead of giving us Dale Cooper as we remember him, we get Dougie Jones - a hollow version of him for most of the season. And somehow, that absurd, frustrating choice becomes brilliant. It forces us to feel the weight of lost time, identity, and purpose. When Cooper finally returns, it's euphoric - but even that moment doesn't last. Lynch is constantly reminding us: "You will never go back to how things were."

The themes of Twin Peaks as a whole are so profound that I still don't think I've fully unpacked them. Identity, trauma, duality, the nature of evil, the illusion of time - it's all there. Laura Palmer isn't just a girl who was murdered. She becomes this symbol of suffering, of purity corrupted, and also of resistance. Lynch doesn't treat evil as something that can be easily explained or defeated. It's everywhere - in the woods, in our homes, in ourselves. And then there's Judy, or Jowday, this metaphysical force of pure malevolence that's never truly seen but always felt. You can't fight it head-on. You can't even fully understand it.

And then there are the absurd fan theories - which I love. Some people think Cooper is trapped in a time loop. Others say Laura is actually the dreamer, or that the whole thing is playing out in some alternate dimension within her mind. There's the idea that The Return is a meditation on art itself - Lynch literally creating a world and then trying to save his own creation. And of course, Monica Bellucci's dream - "We are like the dreamer who dreams, and then lives inside the dream" - is maybe the most cryptic, and most revealing, line in the entire show. That moment hit me hard. It felt like Lynch wasn't just telling a story - he was questioning the very act of storytelling.

What makes Twin Peaks: The Return a masterpiece in my eyes isn't just the complexity or the visuals or even the sound design (which is incredible). It's the feeling that David Lynch is operating on a frequency most people can't hear. He's not trying to impress anyone. He's just being, expressing something deeply personal, something raw and often uncomfortable. It's not always fun. It's not always entertaining. But it's honest. And in a world full of media that's trying so hard to be palatable, Lynch's work feels like a scream in the void - haunting, beautiful, and impossible to forget.

It's finally here! And the first 2 hour episode of season 3 is an absolute joy to watch. When the original series aired, i was in my early teens, but i could still enjoy the show. I might not have understood all that was going on, but as it turned out, neither did anyone else.

This was the magic behind Twin Peaks, it had no conclusion, like ever. It's the everlasting chase or hunt for something, that is never found. And once the murderer was revealed in the original series, the viewers left the show quickly, it wasn't suppose to be revealing. People watched it for the mystery, and apparently this mystery could have been stretched for 10 seasons, and people would still have been glued to their seats every time a new episode aired. The show was that captivating, more so than almost anything ever aired before.

This was so different from anything else back then, no one had ever dared to make something like this, almost not even with movies. Actually the show was intended to be just a TV movie, but the people that saw it went ballistic, so they decided to make 7 episodes to air. But then the show exploded in popularity and got 10+ emmy award nominations and suddenly the show became insanely popular.

It's kind of a mystery how, it was definitely not a show made for everyone, but still, it ranks as one of the best shows of all time. Why? What was so special about this show? Well you could probably line up 10 professors and movie experts to try and explain it, you would probably get 10 different answers.

So here we are 25+ years later. The first episode of the new season has just aired, and i am thrilled. This was an absolute joy to watch, and it captures the essence of the original series really well. You can tell that Lynch is all over it, he has total control. And just as you would expect, it is bizarre, weird, mystical, scary and incredibly entertaining. And i have no idea what so ever what is happening.

When i saw this first episode i thought of Quentin Tarantino a lot and how great he is at setting up conversation scenes with lots of tension, like the pipe scene at the beginning of Inglorious Basterds. Which is one of the best scenes in all of movie history.

Here in this first episode you have this kind of tension in almost every scene, and the people could be doing anything. Eating donuts, checking voicemails, deliver packages, watch TV, have sex. Whatever, the suspense is with it all the way, and i have no idea why, because i have no clue what I'm watching. It's just there.

This is one of the things that makes Twin Peaks so special, you are just along for the ride, no matter where it takes you, just enjoy the moment. Let it embrace you, it is what you want it to be. And this show does this better than any other TV show in history. The new season is apparently no exception. After the first episode I'm sold, when the song was performed at the end of it, while we see many of the original cast come together, that just sealed it for me, what a way to continue the saga. Absolutely brilliant film making.

I can't wait to see the rest of it, this is quality.

10/10 first episode - Masterful

First of all, let me start this review of the third season of Twin Peaks by saying that I deeply love the first and second seasons. They truly are iconic seasons of television, and having recently re- watched them, I came to the conclusion that they firmly stand the test of time.

However, one of the main problems I had with the first and second seasons of Twin Peaks (Although it was mainly in the latter, than the former) was it's deviation away from the central component which I believed made the show tick- the mystery. The mystery of Twin Peaks submerged this seemingly 'normal' town into an environment in which there were endless different otherworldly phenomenon at play. The original Twin Peaks created a feeling of uneasiness for the audience through numerous ways, such as Bob. This feeling of mystery and unease however, became somewhat tangled up in many different love stories which were all a bit too common place in the show. Nevertheless, I persisted with it and still found it to overall be an enjoyable show, despite the various James-Donna-Laura-Maddie-Bobby-Shelly-Leo stories which stretched on.

Now, when I got to this season, I was not disappointed. Season Three of Twin Peaks takes the mystical and the downright weird elements of the first and second season and places them into a show of their own. I would imagine that many of the original viewers who enjoyed the soap opera element of the first and second seasons, will be extremely disappointed. This series is unlike anything else that I have ever witness on television (yes, I did say that when I watched Twin Peaks the first time around!). The revival of Twin Peaks has come at the best possible time, for both the show and television. Modern Television now allows for less constraints on many shows, and more recently, risks have been allowed to be made. The original seasons of Twin Peaks were risks in themselves, but they still had boundaries attached to them. Lynch could not deviate as far as he can today. This combination of modern television and Lynch's vision create a spectacle for television which is unlike anything there has previously been. Some of the visual shots of different elements of the mythology in the new season of Twin Peaks, are absolutely remarkable and unique. The precedent for season three is well and truly based upon Lynch's exploration of Twin Peaks mythology.

Whilst there is a new depth to the show, as we travel further afield to New York City and South Dakota end explore the mythology, the scenes which place us back into the town of Twin Peaks contain the finite amount of nostalgia for the series. It doesn't feel as if there has been a shoehorning of nostalgia in this season, rather the scenes feel appropriate and suitable for the show. Therefore, whilst the show is extending its branches beyond the town of Twin Peaks, the return to the town does not feel as if the show is doing it for the sake of it.

Overall, the new season of Twin Peaks is truly a remarkable piece of television. I find myself wondering 'what if?', in terms of what if we never experienced this show returning? This series could be when Twin Peaks hits another level and surpasses the original run. It will take till the end of the season before we can truly determine that. However, I would urge anyone who was interested in the original run, and anyone who is interested in groundbreaking and unique television to give this show a try. You may not like it, it may deviate too far from the original seasons which you enjoyed so much, or you might find it deviates too far from what you are normally used to. Nevertheless, I believe that this is a show which should be watched to at least engage with the uniqueness of the experience that comes with watching it. So sit back, get yourself some cherry pie and a damn fine cup of coffee and enjoy what is a masterclass return to Twin Peaks.

A quarter of a century after it ended, Twin Peaks gets a season 3. That in itself is part of the weirdness of Twin Peaks; it's not a reboot, or a remake, it's just ... season 3, picking up just where season 2 left off.

No one but David Lynch would do that.

I suspect whether you will love or hate this series return (and people seem to do one or the other) will depend on what you liked about the original Twin Peaks. If you liked the quirky soap opera aspect of things in plot threads like the lumber mill, well, this might not be for you. If, like me, your favorite scenes were the really weird ones like the hotel scene that began episode 2 and the amazing scene of the kid and the creamed corn, and if you didn't understand while people didn't appreciate the utter brilliance of Fire Walk With Me, then you'll probably like this.

The series begins with the weirdness turned up to ten and the eventfulness turned down to zero, as though Lynch is saying, yes, I made Twin Peaks, but don't forget I'm also the guy who did Inland Empire.

After a while the Inland Empire aspects thankfully become fewer and there is more of the quirky humor of the original series (as in a scene with cops try to track down a key to an apartment), actual story and character, and Lynch's typical approach of painting a placid surface and then showing the rot underneath. And some of the old elements of the series, like a weirdly ageless Kimmy Robertson as Lucy and Lynch as Gordon Cole, are every bit as fun and funny as they were in the original.

At times full Lynchian madness flares up, like the a-bomb test episode that thrilled some people and that annoyed others, like me. Other times, Lynch shocks everyone by actually offering detailed explanaions of some of the mysteries he has raised in the original series and Fire Walk with Me. At times Lynch seems to be saying, "here's a sensible answer to that thing you've been wondering about for years, but before you get too happy here's another unexplained weird thing to replace that."

I wasn't as fanatic about Twin Peaks as some people. I didn't find the pilot especially interesting until funny, eccentric Dale Cooper appeared, and without Kyle MacClachlan I probably never would have watched the second episode. I didn't fully love the series until the incredible weirdness of the second season, and that love didn't last long since the show quickly spiraled into a disastrous mess.

That may be why I enjoy this third season and Fire Walk With Me; they represent David Lynch giving me the aspects of the series I love without all the boring soap stuff.

Some of Twin Peaks is hugely annoying, other parts are utterly fascinating. Overall, I found it very entertaining, and if it's not everything I want (after 4 episodes I rated this 9 stars, but at season's end dropped it to 8), well, that's David Lynch.

One final note. I've seen several reviews saying that the only people who like this series are "hipsters." This is the silliest critique I've ever seen. I'll admit I don't know much about hipsters except they wear funny mustaches and churn their own butter, but my guess is hipsters are not all people who like to watch a revival of a series they don't remember starring a bunch of people old enough to be their parents. Just a guess.

No, you silly 1-star reviewers, I'm not a hipster, and I'm not, as some have suggested, a "paid reviewer" (although if someone can tell me how to make money by writing IMDb reviews please do so). I'm just someone who likes David Lynch when he's very weird but not tediously, incomprehensibly so. And that's what, for the most part, Twin Peaks the Return gives its audience.