ethancrater

Had VERY low expectations going into this, normally anything related to Ghost Adventures is overly cheap and flashy. The first two episodes were surprisingly subtle and paced very well. Some of the acting falls apart in episode 3, and we skipped the fourth episode because everything connected to the Manson murders is overdone.

It's not perfect by any means, but it is a nice change from quick jump scares that are the crutch of so many short horror productions. The first two episodes especially used very effective visuals and were very creepy, not just for what was shown but also what was not shown. Worth the 30-40 minute watch times at least.

Either the review at the beginning is entirely bogus or someone was paid (bribed) to write an overly generous review. The scariest thing about this...film?...is how bored you will be. Absolutely nothing scary happens, the few pieces of paranormal "evidence" are meaningless and could easily be faked. Don't waste your time. The cast blathers inanely for pretty much the entire run, the only time anything resembling excitement shows up is right at the very end. How convenient for them that the best "evidence" was at the end of the investigation.

The location is even blatantly fraudulent, a 400 year old Victorian? I'm not british, but I'm 99.999% sure queen Victoria wasn't alive 400 years ago, so kinda weird for someone jump the gun architecturally by 200 some years.

TLDR: it's bad, boring, bland, and BS. It doesn't even have comedic value, it's not interesting enough to make fun of.