michaeljb
Entrou em jan. de 2006
Bem-vindo(a) ao novo perfil
Nossas atualizações ainda estão em desenvolvimento. Embora a versão anterior do perfil não esteja mais acessível, estamos trabalhando ativamente em melhorias, e alguns dos recursos ausentes retornarão em breve! Fique atento ao retorno deles. Enquanto isso, Análise de Classificação ainda está disponível em nossos aplicativos iOS e Android, encontrados na página de perfil. Para visualizar suas Distribuições de Classificação por ano e gênero, consulte nossa nova Guia de ajuda.
Selos2
Para saber como ganhar selos, acesse página de ajuda de selos.
Avaliações4
Classificação de michaeljb
Avaliações3
Classificação de michaeljb
People already familiar with Comfort's previous efforts will know the drill here, and it's more of the same. On a positive point, this film does have better production values than the others.
As has already been noted, this is just the same old Ray. Same old arguments (some presented differently so as to appear new), and the same old intellectual dishonesty and stone cold ignorance that we've come to expect from this particular antipodean reality-dodger, who doesn't understand what modern bananas are, and thinks calling him a "bibliophile" is a serious insult.
If you are an honest Christian, looking for a serious argument against atheism, please do look elsewhere. I'd like to think that most run-of- the-mill Christians are more honest than Ray Comfort could ever hope to be. If you swallowed Ray's promises of this being some kind of death blow to atheism, then I am afraid (but not surprised) that you have been lied to (again). I would be very surprised if any well educated Christians would fall for this kindergarten level nonsense.
To any well read atheists who are considering watching this; please ensure your head is well protected from the inevitable pounding it will receive from banging it against a desk, or perhaps wear boxing gloves to protect your hands and face from too much face-palming.
This film proves only one thing; that Comfort is a very good salesman and film editor.
As has already been noted, this is just the same old Ray. Same old arguments (some presented differently so as to appear new), and the same old intellectual dishonesty and stone cold ignorance that we've come to expect from this particular antipodean reality-dodger, who doesn't understand what modern bananas are, and thinks calling him a "bibliophile" is a serious insult.
If you are an honest Christian, looking for a serious argument against atheism, please do look elsewhere. I'd like to think that most run-of- the-mill Christians are more honest than Ray Comfort could ever hope to be. If you swallowed Ray's promises of this being some kind of death blow to atheism, then I am afraid (but not surprised) that you have been lied to (again). I would be very surprised if any well educated Christians would fall for this kindergarten level nonsense.
To any well read atheists who are considering watching this; please ensure your head is well protected from the inevitable pounding it will receive from banging it against a desk, or perhaps wear boxing gloves to protect your hands and face from too much face-palming.
This film proves only one thing; that Comfort is a very good salesman and film editor.
OK, so I am a big Ace Ventura fan. Even so, I was unaware that this film even existed until a couple of weeks ago. I read most of the reviews here at IMDb and thought to myself "Surely this film can't be THAT bad?". I managed to see this "movie" a couple of days ago. I'd like to apologise to all the reviewers here for my obvious folly! This has just about ruined the Ace Ventura franchise for me forever. Until I saw this, I was convinced that Grease 2 was probably the worst sequel that ever had the audacity to call itself a movie, but I was wrong again.
This film doesn't scrape the bottom of the barrel. It lifts it up and digs right underneath it. To say this film was an abomination would be like saying Hitler's Final Solution was a small error of judgement.
If you're the type of person that likes nipple clamps, thumb-screws and being beaten by a leather clad sadist, then this film might be for you, but then again, maybe there is a pain threshold that's too much even for you? Stay away. You have been warned.
This film doesn't scrape the bottom of the barrel. It lifts it up and digs right underneath it. To say this film was an abomination would be like saying Hitler's Final Solution was a small error of judgement.
If you're the type of person that likes nipple clamps, thumb-screws and being beaten by a leather clad sadist, then this film might be for you, but then again, maybe there is a pain threshold that's too much even for you? Stay away. You have been warned.
I loved this! I suppose being a huge snooker fan at the time helped a little, but I was also a Robert Lindsay fan too, so it was double helpings of pleasure for me. Give Us a Break was a very much underrated series, that deserved more than the single series it was given.
I think the BBC would do well to remake this series, setting it in the present time so we can see what the two main characters (Lindsay and McGann) are up to now. Did Mo (McGann) ever make it to become a pro player and stay the course I wonder?
BRING IT BACK!
PLEASE!
I think the BBC would do well to remake this series, setting it in the present time so we can see what the two main characters (Lindsay and McGann) are up to now. Did Mo (McGann) ever make it to become a pro player and stay the course I wonder?
BRING IT BACK!
PLEASE!