relate-47835
Entrou em ago. de 2016
Bem-vindo(a) ao novo perfil
Nossas atualizações ainda estão em desenvolvimento. Embora a versão anterior do perfil não esteja mais acessível, estamos trabalhando ativamente em melhorias, e alguns dos recursos ausentes retornarão em breve! Fique atento ao retorno deles. Enquanto isso, Análise de Classificação ainda está disponível em nossos aplicativos iOS e Android, encontrados na página de perfil. Para visualizar suas Distribuições de Classificação por ano e gênero, consulte nossa nova Guia de ajuda.
Selos2
Para saber como ganhar selos, acesse página de ajuda de selos.
Avaliações8
Classificação de relate-47835
Avaliações8
Classificação de relate-47835
I agree with what comes up as the "Dec 13, 2007" review about there being so much talking-over each over and racial-preferences displayed by who dominates the time and interrupts any, all other speakers.
There is no 'fair', equal share time given by whoever chooses or prefers to display which louder voice OVER the others.
The dis-cussion is more obvious dissing than giving us actual current events review. The big black woman- who repeatedly dominates and then pretends to be a "moderator "- NOT. while she is most often being speaker-selective and then taking Full Control -by being both louder, DOMINANT, and maybe she's given hidden permissions - by their editors ( being out of sight, unknown, and with those who run the show with un-admitted partialities )
The one named as main speaker, Joy, is mostly undercut, over-ridden, over-shouted and dis-allowed equal space on this show, now July, 2018.. And we want to hear more, not less, from a smart, more moderate central woman there.
The attorney who continually claims to be the most-smart-right-authority, because she has been a 'prosecutor' and thinks she is entitled to be RIGHT more often with more interruptions and more selective opinions than most others, guests included, is the most objectionable and obnoxious.
She continually gives "in My opinion" & "in My experiences" - as if she were the majority anywhere or a best example of anything - NOT. That the editors allow or encourage such elitist and pretend-to-be-highest-authority there is a bad, irritating to public, move.
The best way to keep an audience is not the continual OVER-shouting, to create stimulus, excitement and provocative negativity displayed by women who are rude and mean to each other.
But to show more information and opinions given in a cooperative, sharing the space more equally and proportionally ethnically and political-positionally than is present now.
The value of this show is to provoke others to write elsewhere about how disturbing this show is, instead of how valuable it is.
Getting profits and views from negativity seems to be the choices made now, sadly, and helping create the divisiveness that predominates the actual political worlds as well as 'entertainment' on this TV.
An unhelpful show to spend time otherwise spent to be learning, changing, growing, or helping make this a better place. DO not watch unless you too are willing to be angrier, more frustrated and have a bad view of how women can act with each other on TV.
There is no 'fair', equal share time given by whoever chooses or prefers to display which louder voice OVER the others.
The dis-cussion is more obvious dissing than giving us actual current events review. The big black woman- who repeatedly dominates and then pretends to be a "moderator "- NOT. while she is most often being speaker-selective and then taking Full Control -by being both louder, DOMINANT, and maybe she's given hidden permissions - by their editors ( being out of sight, unknown, and with those who run the show with un-admitted partialities )
The one named as main speaker, Joy, is mostly undercut, over-ridden, over-shouted and dis-allowed equal space on this show, now July, 2018.. And we want to hear more, not less, from a smart, more moderate central woman there.
The attorney who continually claims to be the most-smart-right-authority, because she has been a 'prosecutor' and thinks she is entitled to be RIGHT more often with more interruptions and more selective opinions than most others, guests included, is the most objectionable and obnoxious.
She continually gives "in My opinion" & "in My experiences" - as if she were the majority anywhere or a best example of anything - NOT. That the editors allow or encourage such elitist and pretend-to-be-highest-authority there is a bad, irritating to public, move.
The best way to keep an audience is not the continual OVER-shouting, to create stimulus, excitement and provocative negativity displayed by women who are rude and mean to each other.
But to show more information and opinions given in a cooperative, sharing the space more equally and proportionally ethnically and political-positionally than is present now.
The value of this show is to provoke others to write elsewhere about how disturbing this show is, instead of how valuable it is.
Getting profits and views from negativity seems to be the choices made now, sadly, and helping create the divisiveness that predominates the actual political worlds as well as 'entertainment' on this TV.
An unhelpful show to spend time otherwise spent to be learning, changing, growing, or helping make this a better place. DO not watch unless you too are willing to be angrier, more frustrated and have a bad view of how women can act with each other on TV.
