redmondson-81269

This movie had me constantly pausing because I was laughing so hard I couldn't follow what was happening next. As someone who turned on this movie specifically because I loved Josh Brolin in Sicario, No Country for Old Men, and pretty much everything else he's done, this film showed he has incredible range and chemistry with anyone you put in front of him.

It would be tragic if Brolin and Dinklage didn't at least do a couple more films together. I acknowledge that due to Dinklage's stature that the dynamic may begin to feel contrived, but if the writing and directing is up to par with this film, it wouldn't matter.

I often find that the largest gap in comedy appreciation is in the dialogue. Great, cleverly dense dialogue can really hit home with someone who appreciates it, and completely go over the head of those who don't.

I just want to also add that there is someone here who compares to this movie to "Twins" despite that they've never seen Twins. Can't tell if it's a troll, hilarious if it is, they are an imbecile if it isn't lmao.

This movie is called, "Brothers." They aren't twins. They weren't separated at birth. They grew up being criminals, and reunited later. So besides the fact that one character has dwarfism, and the other character does not, and that they engage in a (sort of) heist, it has absolutely nothing to do with Twins, which the person who wrote that absolute idiotic nonsense would have known, had they watched the movie they were comparing this movie to.

Dual moral of this story is that a comedy is a comedy and doesn't need to also include a copious amount of action to be thoroughly entertaining. And if you haven't watched a movie, don't compare a movie you just watched to a movie you have never watched, stoopid.