JimmyCagney

Epitaph is one of those films that can very easily disappoint you when you first watch it. Especially if you expect a Ringu type flick. True, it's beautiful visually, but the storytelling is so complex that it makes you feel that either the directors - and the writer- have lost control over their material, or that you're missing something crucial. Actually, the later is the key. Cause Epitaph is not just a creepy horror flick. It's a beautiful film about LOVE. Love through and beyond life and death. Love is the common theme that connects all those perplexed stories and scenes. Having that in mind, I decided to watch it again and I must say, this time I though I was watching a totally different movie. So, my suggestion to you is this. If you're looking for a clean K-horror flick with ghosts and all the classic Ringu themes, don't watch this one. You'll be very disappointed. However, if you're interested in something more that that, give Epitaph a chance. It may not be the best one out there, but it surely has quite a lot of things to tell you.

Just 7 reviews on this one by the time I'm writing this, with a couple of them being very very negative.

Bla, bla, bla... 1939 was the best year in Hollywood history (since when? who said that?) ... bla, bla, bla...Tyrone Power is terrible... bla, bla, bla... they should have casted Cary Grant.

NONSENSE. The script is fairly good (as long as someone has seen a couple of 1930's films more than just "Holiday" and "Bringing Up Baby") and Tyrone Power is quite descent and very funny.

Furthermore, someone who has watched just a few of the dozens of romantic - screwball comedies of that era, would have known that there were MANY other male leads besides Cary Grant, actors who gave as wonderful performances as C.G. gave in some of his films. They would also know that even though Cary Grant was magnificent, he also had done some VERY BAD movies through the 30's.

Finally, a request for the IMDb stuff. It's terribly unfair for a movie to have on it's main page a 100 word review with the title "Simply awful!". Especially when this review gives absolutely no reasons on why the movie is "awful". The fact that 22/26 people who have read the review, DISAPPROVED it, speaks for itself.

I logged in just to see the overall rating of this farce. I can't believe viewers all over the world could have given it an average 7+ rating. This movie (especially the 2nd half) is totally, absolutely, completely stupid and pointless. I got nothing against good pointless action - disaster - post apocalyptic movies (only yesterday I watched Van Damme's Cyborg after almost 15 years, and I enjoyed it a lot). Unlike Cyborg however, this crap is supposed to be more than a plain post apocalyptic b-production. After all it carries the heritage of one of the most interesting movies of it's genre. As a matter of fact, it's worse than a b-movie, straight to video / cable TV production. Cause the effects may be slightly better, but the plot has NO RESPECT TO THE VIEWER'S INTELLECT. Dozens of stupid decisions from the characters,hundreds of clichés, dozens of unexplained twists, the infected have reason, etc...I don't have to mention all these once more. They've been analyzed on many posts and comments in here. All I want to say (and the reason why I write this comment is) that it's been quite a long time since a movie has annoyed me so much. It's screenplay is an insult to my logic, and my emotions as well.

Shame on those who wrote this crap and to those who read the script and decided to finance the project, so that I would waste 2 hours watching it.

It's a total disgrace to consider this crap as the sequel of 28 days later. It's more like a sequel to Dumb and Dumberer, or the tele-tubbies to me..