Doctor_Phil
Entrou em mar. de 2004
Bem-vindo(a) ao novo perfil
Nossas atualizações ainda estão em desenvolvimento. Embora a versão anterior do perfil não esteja mais acessível, estamos trabalhando ativamente em melhorias, e alguns dos recursos ausentes retornarão em breve! Fique atento ao retorno deles. Enquanto isso, Análise de Classificação ainda está disponível em nossos aplicativos iOS e Android, encontrados na página de perfil. Para visualizar suas Distribuições de Classificação por ano e gênero, consulte nossa nova Guia de ajuda.
Selos3
Para saber como ganhar selos, acesse página de ajuda de selos.
Avaliações28
Classificação de Doctor_Phil
Avaliações20
Classificação de Doctor_Phil
Technically, it's very good. I like the music, the choreography, the sets, the actors. My problem is with what they did to the story of Wicked.
The purpose of literature and art is to ask hard questions, not to insist that there are no questions. The book's thesis is that the bad actions of individuals should be blamed on society more than on those individuals. Not an argument I have much sympathy for, but it is an argument, written back in the day when people used to argue rather than just shout at each other.
The movie erases that argument by eliminating all of Elphaba's terrible deeds, turning her into a saintly victim of card-stock villains. This narrative has no reason to exist except to pretend that American politics today is a simple battle between good and evil. Wicked is, in fact, wicked.
The purpose of literature and art is to ask hard questions, not to insist that there are no questions. The book's thesis is that the bad actions of individuals should be blamed on society more than on those individuals. Not an argument I have much sympathy for, but it is an argument, written back in the day when people used to argue rather than just shout at each other.
The movie erases that argument by eliminating all of Elphaba's terrible deeds, turning her into a saintly victim of card-stock villains. This narrative has no reason to exist except to pretend that American politics today is a simple battle between good and evil. Wicked is, in fact, wicked.
Double Rainboom is pretty good at what it is--a Hanna-Barbera-style show, using MLP characters flattened down to their basic repertoire of tics (like Hanna-Barbera characters are). It has funny animations and constant action. But it isn't a story. It's two different stories pasted together: a framing story about interactions between Twilight and Rainbow, and a crackfic about Rainbow Dash vs. Powerpuff Girls.
This over-long interlude with the Powerpuff Girls was connected to the framing story only by mere physical causality: events from the framing story caused Rainbow to enter another dimension. But there was no intentional causality. Rainbow went there by random chance, not due to any decision of her own. Her exit from it was also, from her perspective, pure luck. So you can't say Rainbow had a character arc, since the events she supposedly learned to avoid, couldn't have been predicted.
It was completely unsatisfactory to anyone expecting MLP, which was extremely character-based under the blessed rule of Lauren Faust. That doesn't mean just repeating their basic stereotypical kinks. It also doesn't mean putting characters into the most-obvious conflicts their characters could have. A classic MLP G4 episode (meaning seasons 1+2) shows a situation in which the ponies learn how to work together, using their different individual talents as necessary, rather than each trying to do things their own way. Double Rainboom doesn't even have a full conflict, because it never explains what Twilight wants to do with the potion that Rainbow steals. It is physical conflict without character conflict, and physical causality without intentional causality.
This over-long interlude with the Powerpuff Girls was connected to the framing story only by mere physical causality: events from the framing story caused Rainbow to enter another dimension. But there was no intentional causality. Rainbow went there by random chance, not due to any decision of her own. Her exit from it was also, from her perspective, pure luck. So you can't say Rainbow had a character arc, since the events she supposedly learned to avoid, couldn't have been predicted.
It was completely unsatisfactory to anyone expecting MLP, which was extremely character-based under the blessed rule of Lauren Faust. That doesn't mean just repeating their basic stereotypical kinks. It also doesn't mean putting characters into the most-obvious conflicts their characters could have. A classic MLP G4 episode (meaning seasons 1+2) shows a situation in which the ponies learn how to work together, using their different individual talents as necessary, rather than each trying to do things their own way. Double Rainboom doesn't even have a full conflict, because it never explains what Twilight wants to do with the potion that Rainbow steals. It is physical conflict without character conflict, and physical causality without intentional causality.
The concept is very clever; the execution seems deliberately designed to obscure the concept and prevent the viewer from making any sense of the movie. I don't know whether Charlie Kaufman habitually and deliberately includes things from his adaptation sources without the context needed to make sense of them because he things it's cool, or whether idiot producers and editors mangle the film so it doesn't make sense anymore; but it's a common problem with Kaufman's movies.
Tulsey Town is a nickname for Tulsa, Oklahoma. That name doesn't appear in the book. Just another red herring Kaufman threw in for no good reason.
Tulsey Town is a nickname for Tulsa, Oklahoma. That name doesn't appear in the book. Just another red herring Kaufman threw in for no good reason.