KittieC
Entrou em jan. de 2013
Bem-vindo(a) ao novo perfil
Nossas atualizações ainda estão em desenvolvimento. Embora a versão anterior do perfil não esteja mais acessível, estamos trabalhando ativamente em melhorias, e alguns dos recursos ausentes retornarão em breve! Fique atento ao retorno deles. Enquanto isso, Análise de Classificação ainda está disponível em nossos aplicativos iOS e Android, encontrados na página de perfil. Para visualizar suas Distribuições de Classificação por ano e gênero, consulte nossa nova Guia de ajuda.
Selos2
Para saber como ganhar selos, acesse página de ajuda de selos.
Avaliações83
Classificação de KittieC
I left watching Sinners until the fizz died down but I haven't seen a film in a long time that made me so curious, thoughtful and excited.
It's genre-defying and the fact it has vampires in it, for me, didn't come close to making it a 'horror film'.
The vampires are a cleverly used and highly appropriate device but this film is about so much more.
The layers of symbolism, the craft of its slow-burn, its deft character creation, the wonderful script and brilliant rendering by the actors and director are all so much more relevant.
I'm honestly kind of lost for words because I'm still mulling it over but I encourage anyone who still hasn't seen it - if there is anyone - to forget about the vampires and instead lean into all the rest that it offers.
I can wait to see more.
It's genre-defying and the fact it has vampires in it, for me, didn't come close to making it a 'horror film'.
The vampires are a cleverly used and highly appropriate device but this film is about so much more.
The layers of symbolism, the craft of its slow-burn, its deft character creation, the wonderful script and brilliant rendering by the actors and director are all so much more relevant.
I'm honestly kind of lost for words because I'm still mulling it over but I encourage anyone who still hasn't seen it - if there is anyone - to forget about the vampires and instead lean into all the rest that it offers.
I can wait to see more.
I really wanted to like season 3. Season 1 felt like a fresh take with some laugh-out-loud moments and fun characters. Season 2 I maybe even enjoyed more. But for me, the bloom has really gone off by season 3.
The 'upstairs/downstairs' contrast is neither as catchy or impactful as the previous seasons and the Agatha Christie-esque moments of the final instalment are telegraphed transparently. Several of the characters and arcs are just as predictable and there are few stand-out performances.
I know lots of viewers are put off by the over-abundance of villains in the White Lotus anthology but it's key to its weird charm. But this set of characters are more hapless than anything else.
And speaking of villains, I'm not sure why Mook is given such a free ride. The fact that she's stunning doesn't make up for her manipulation of poor Gaitok.
I'll look forward to series 4 if there is one, if only to see if the producers can recapture the dark satire of previous seasons and give us something to really talk about other that Walton Goggins, who is good but not great, particularly when played against the marvellous Aimee Lee Wood.
The 'upstairs/downstairs' contrast is neither as catchy or impactful as the previous seasons and the Agatha Christie-esque moments of the final instalment are telegraphed transparently. Several of the characters and arcs are just as predictable and there are few stand-out performances.
I know lots of viewers are put off by the over-abundance of villains in the White Lotus anthology but it's key to its weird charm. But this set of characters are more hapless than anything else.
And speaking of villains, I'm not sure why Mook is given such a free ride. The fact that she's stunning doesn't make up for her manipulation of poor Gaitok.
I'll look forward to series 4 if there is one, if only to see if the producers can recapture the dark satire of previous seasons and give us something to really talk about other that Walton Goggins, who is good but not great, particularly when played against the marvellous Aimee Lee Wood.
Having just done a rewatch 20 years after its first screening I was keen to see the belated bookend to the grossly underfinished series.
It's not that Deadwood the movie is bad, but it's also not good.
The remarkable re-assembly of the original cast is delightful and some of the energy and wit of its unique dialogue is there, although its freshness is off.
And I know it's a small thing but picking up physical continuity after a 10 year break is obviously hard it shouldn't be this hard.
Some of the characters seem correctly aged but others, including key protagonist Bullock have time warped.
Not that historical accuracy has to govern it but at the series start Bullock would have been in his 20s - but is greyed out Iike a 60 year old just 10 years later.
The interval between the end of the series and the film is more than a decade - reasonably they didn't need to paint age on any of the characters, let alone with such a heavy hand.
It was nice to see the band back together. It was fun. But it still leaves Deadwood without the ending it deserved.
It's not that Deadwood the movie is bad, but it's also not good.
The remarkable re-assembly of the original cast is delightful and some of the energy and wit of its unique dialogue is there, although its freshness is off.
And I know it's a small thing but picking up physical continuity after a 10 year break is obviously hard it shouldn't be this hard.
Some of the characters seem correctly aged but others, including key protagonist Bullock have time warped.
Not that historical accuracy has to govern it but at the series start Bullock would have been in his 20s - but is greyed out Iike a 60 year old just 10 years later.
The interval between the end of the series and the film is more than a decade - reasonably they didn't need to paint age on any of the characters, let alone with such a heavy hand.
It was nice to see the band back together. It was fun. But it still leaves Deadwood without the ending it deserved.