sanjsrik
Entrou em ago. de 2010
Bem-vindo(a) ao novo perfil
Nossas atualizações ainda estão em desenvolvimento. Embora a versão anterior do perfil não esteja mais acessível, estamos trabalhando ativamente em melhorias, e alguns dos recursos ausentes retornarão em breve! Fique atento ao retorno deles. Enquanto isso, Análise de Classificação ainda está disponível em nossos aplicativos iOS e Android, encontrados na página de perfil. Para visualizar suas Distribuições de Classificação por ano e gênero, consulte nossa nova Guia de ajuda.
Selos2
Para saber como ganhar selos, acesse página de ajuda de selos.
Avaliações112
Classificação de sanjsrik
Avaliações95
Classificação de sanjsrik
I made it through the first 20 minutes and that was 20 minutes too long. It was cartoonish, badly acted, childish in its plot, and plain silly. Nothing in the "movie" told me I was watching anything other than an amateurish student film. Was it meant to be this bad? I just kept asking myself over and over again. Was it meant to be this bad? None of the characters are believable. There's a "super dog"??? Who came up with this script? Nothing in this "movie" was good. There's massive plot holes and nothing makes any sense. And that was within the first 10 minutes. Who actually makes it through this whole entire thing and doesn't come away wondering why did I waste my time?
The "movie" has no good dialog, no good plot, meanders all over the place, actors say lines with smirks knowing how bad they are, and generally, the only thing that might have been good, the locations and sets, are ruined because you have to look around the actors to see the locations. Otherwise, there's so much woodenness in the lines, and the acting, and the plot, and the entire "movie".
Did guy richie have gambling debts he needed to pay off? Is this just the norm now for directors to phone it in with sub-par bad movies?
I'd provide spoilers but what would be the point? If you watch it long enough to care, you've already committed hari kari to get away from remembering how bad this movie was.
Did guy richie have gambling debts he needed to pay off? Is this just the norm now for directors to phone it in with sub-par bad movies?
I'd provide spoilers but what would be the point? If you watch it long enough to care, you've already committed hari kari to get away from remembering how bad this movie was.
There could be a worse way to make a gangster movie, they could have hired pee wee herman and then at least it would have been better than this because it might have been funny. This is just painful to watch. It's "actors" acting like what caricatures of gangsters would act like if they saw them on tv when they were children.
It's just a bad bad bad bad boring and slow and painful movie to watch. The characters are laughable, the "plot" whatever the plot is, is meandering, the "action" is about as exciting as watching paint dry.
Don't waste your time. I swear deniro must have had bills to pay because there's no other reason why he's been making worse and worse movies and tv shows.
It's just a bad bad bad bad boring and slow and painful movie to watch. The characters are laughable, the "plot" whatever the plot is, is meandering, the "action" is about as exciting as watching paint dry.
Don't waste your time. I swear deniro must have had bills to pay because there's no other reason why he's been making worse and worse movies and tv shows.