aapp22
Entrou em fev. de 2003
Bem-vindo(a) ao novo perfil
Nossas atualizações ainda estão em desenvolvimento. Embora a versão anterior do perfil não esteja mais acessível, estamos trabalhando ativamente em melhorias, e alguns dos recursos ausentes retornarão em breve! Fique atento ao retorno deles. Enquanto isso, Análise de Classificação ainda está disponível em nossos aplicativos iOS e Android, encontrados na página de perfil. Para visualizar suas Distribuições de Classificação por ano e gênero, consulte nossa nova Guia de ajuda.
Selos2
Para saber como ganhar selos, acesse página de ajuda de selos.
Avaliações3
Classificação de aapp22
Worth watching if you liked the original - but don't despair just yet there's still coolness left in the Matrix.
There's a lot more of what we call skinny-latte philosophy, it doesn't really matter because we do not know how the trilogy is going to end - this is merely the interlude.
The beauty of Monica Bellucci is worth the admission price and the philosophizing by the French baddie is "mind-boggling" in the funny sense (even tough I liked the cake-thing he did with the blonde)
The special effects were sort of experimental and did seem fake at times but don't worry it's just a movie. The quality and credibility of the Matrix trilogy will obviously be judged after "Revolutions".
I liked and was interested by the ideas running throughout the film but I feel that somehow they could have been better portrayed if the budget had been smaller!
Still better than any of the latest attempts at Sci-Fi by George Lucas/Spielberg.
7 out of 10 for me.
There's a lot more of what we call skinny-latte philosophy, it doesn't really matter because we do not know how the trilogy is going to end - this is merely the interlude.
The beauty of Monica Bellucci is worth the admission price and the philosophizing by the French baddie is "mind-boggling" in the funny sense (even tough I liked the cake-thing he did with the blonde)
The special effects were sort of experimental and did seem fake at times but don't worry it's just a movie. The quality and credibility of the Matrix trilogy will obviously be judged after "Revolutions".
I liked and was interested by the ideas running throughout the film but I feel that somehow they could have been better portrayed if the budget had been smaller!
Still better than any of the latest attempts at Sci-Fi by George Lucas/Spielberg.
7 out of 10 for me.
During its epic 3,5 hours of duration I managed to make some coffee, fry some eggs and let me assure you that I was a totally different man when it ended - It made me think about the real meaning of life, its beauty and subsequent horrors which we all go through at some point in our existence.
This is sophisticated film-making at its best.
This is sophisticated film-making at its best.
Dune, both the movie and the book are intended for intelligent people, for people who are willing to look deeper into the diverse meanings of a story - some people think it is easy to portray a written masterpiece in a visual form - it isn't!
David Lynch is an exceptional film-maker and I truly appreciate his work but perhaps he wasn't the right man for the job/budget. He's used to work on a lesser scale and with more space for creative interaction.
Dune deals directly with ecological, social, economical and political issues (I could also throw in some family vendettas, drug addictions, technical advancements and extreme survival adaptations)
Dune is complex and it has its own terminology (books have been written just to deal with the glossary of terms) for this same reason I think that just three-four hours of film do not allow for a complete unraveling of DUNE and its grandeur.
There is more to be known about the "Sandworm" and I think that a trilogy of films based on all his six dune books(seven really, but that's another story) would be more suitable for us the masses.
Just imagine the Godfather or the Lord of the Rings trilogy squeezed into three hours of film.
Dune was an expensive flop but there are still people out-there willing to give it another try - Lord of the Rings is just an example (flopped first time around too)
Forget the mini-series they are just for the Sci-Fi channel audience.
David Lynch is an exceptional film-maker and I truly appreciate his work but perhaps he wasn't the right man for the job/budget. He's used to work on a lesser scale and with more space for creative interaction.
Dune deals directly with ecological, social, economical and political issues (I could also throw in some family vendettas, drug addictions, technical advancements and extreme survival adaptations)
Dune is complex and it has its own terminology (books have been written just to deal with the glossary of terms) for this same reason I think that just three-four hours of film do not allow for a complete unraveling of DUNE and its grandeur.
There is more to be known about the "Sandworm" and I think that a trilogy of films based on all his six dune books(seven really, but that's another story) would be more suitable for us the masses.
Just imagine the Godfather or the Lord of the Rings trilogy squeezed into three hours of film.
Dune was an expensive flop but there are still people out-there willing to give it another try - Lord of the Rings is just an example (flopped first time around too)
Forget the mini-series they are just for the Sci-Fi channel audience.