Brevity
Entrou em jan. de 2003
Bem-vindo(a) ao novo perfil
Nossas atualizações ainda estão em desenvolvimento. Embora a versão anterior do perfil não esteja mais acessível, estamos trabalhando ativamente em melhorias, e alguns dos recursos ausentes retornarão em breve! Fique atento ao retorno deles. Enquanto isso, Análise de Classificação ainda está disponível em nossos aplicativos iOS e Android, encontrados na página de perfil. Para visualizar suas Distribuições de Classificação por ano e gênero, consulte nossa nova Guia de ajuda.
Selos10
Para saber como ganhar selos, acesse página de ajuda de selos.
Avaliações39
Classificação de Brevity
No, this isn't a review. You may leave.
Count those whom you like and who are involved in this. Two? Really? I don't believe you. I'd say five to seven is the ideal amount, for each has little screen time - except the leads. What do you know. No, never mind the ideal amount. Of course this is enjoyable if you already have a relationship with even some of these people. Very much so. And who hasn't a relationship with Chris Walken? It is also loose and random, and, alas, a bit frustrating, but so much for the adjectives, now.
I liked the whole jumping around choreography. It was nice, unless I'm mistaken.
Oh, and the Coens. It is certainly not a given that he who likes them will like this. Theirs is a hand (well, four) far more competent than Turturro's, and, uh... The pencil, too.
Oh, and the language. It will certainly cause some rage among the sensitive ones, but crikey, what dudn't these days? Marshmallows, I suppose. They're nice to everybody.
Count those whom you like and who are involved in this. Two? Really? I don't believe you. I'd say five to seven is the ideal amount, for each has little screen time - except the leads. What do you know. No, never mind the ideal amount. Of course this is enjoyable if you already have a relationship with even some of these people. Very much so. And who hasn't a relationship with Chris Walken? It is also loose and random, and, alas, a bit frustrating, but so much for the adjectives, now.
I liked the whole jumping around choreography. It was nice, unless I'm mistaken.
Oh, and the Coens. It is certainly not a given that he who likes them will like this. Theirs is a hand (well, four) far more competent than Turturro's, and, uh... The pencil, too.
Oh, and the language. It will certainly cause some rage among the sensitive ones, but crikey, what dudn't these days? Marshmallows, I suppose. They're nice to everybody.
The premise
I had seen the "The Upside of Anger" before this, but nothing else by him (with the exception of a couple of minutes of "The Mind of the Married Man"). Otherwise I wouldn't have even started, I assume.
The conflict
I watched this through lenient eyeglasses, having liked its successor. Mike, you little rascal, that was a funny bit. Mike, you rascal you, that character-guesses-correctly moment in "Upside" was recycled from here. Mike, you... seem to be enjoying yourself. What's wrong with Hemingway, though? She seems lost. Wait, is it the material? It is sort of... average.
The resolution
I can't give this much credit. Some of the dialogue rides on clichés, some of the goings-on are painfully obvious. Obviously he made this primarily to amuse himself. Not that there's anything wrong with that (look where it got Billy Wilder). The general air is of teenage competence; the incidental air is of frustration (caused by the conflict in the general air). (How quasi-pretentious of me.)
The wrapping up
"The Upside of Anger" may cause someone else to watch this as well. They will notice that whereas that one had a few childish moments to it, this is one childish moment. This won't change the fact that I'll watch anything he does, though, because it's a somewhat funny childish moment.
(The feedback
Too difficult for many - especially considering the forum. Too self-indulgent and vague. Too pseudo-enigmatic. What the heck, though.)
I had seen the "The Upside of Anger" before this, but nothing else by him (with the exception of a couple of minutes of "The Mind of the Married Man"). Otherwise I wouldn't have even started, I assume.
The conflict
I watched this through lenient eyeglasses, having liked its successor. Mike, you little rascal, that was a funny bit. Mike, you rascal you, that character-guesses-correctly moment in "Upside" was recycled from here. Mike, you... seem to be enjoying yourself. What's wrong with Hemingway, though? She seems lost. Wait, is it the material? It is sort of... average.
The resolution
I can't give this much credit. Some of the dialogue rides on clichés, some of the goings-on are painfully obvious. Obviously he made this primarily to amuse himself. Not that there's anything wrong with that (look where it got Billy Wilder). The general air is of teenage competence; the incidental air is of frustration (caused by the conflict in the general air). (How quasi-pretentious of me.)
The wrapping up
"The Upside of Anger" may cause someone else to watch this as well. They will notice that whereas that one had a few childish moments to it, this is one childish moment. This won't change the fact that I'll watch anything he does, though, because it's a somewhat funny childish moment.
(The feedback
Too difficult for many - especially considering the forum. Too self-indulgent and vague. Too pseudo-enigmatic. What the heck, though.)
Enquetes respondidas recentemente
2 pesquisas respondidas no total
