panos5552003
Entrou em nov. de 2011
Bem-vindo(a) ao novo perfil
Nossas atualizações ainda estão em desenvolvimento. Embora a versão anterior do perfil não esteja mais acessível, estamos trabalhando ativamente em melhorias, e alguns dos recursos ausentes retornarão em breve! Fique atento ao retorno deles. Enquanto isso, Análise de Classificação ainda está disponível em nossos aplicativos iOS e Android, encontrados na página de perfil. Para visualizar suas Distribuições de Classificação por ano e gênero, consulte nossa nova Guia de ajuda.
Selos3
Para saber como ganhar selos, acesse página de ajuda de selos.
Avaliações213
Classificação de panos5552003
Avaliações3
Classificação de panos5552003
A must see movie involving a range of emotions and qualities; funny, touching, suspenseful, dramatic, ... liberating!
It demonstrates the importance of art in everyday life, the importance of theatre and acting, especially when you deel or are shackled, enclosed, devalued.
The end was most fitting!
Shame it is not a popular one.
Un triomphe!
"One day, is that not enough for you, one day he went dumb, one day I went blind, one day we'll go deaf, one day we were born, one day we shall die, the same day, the same second, is that not enough for you?" "I'm going." Samuel Beckett, Waiting for Godot.
It demonstrates the importance of art in everyday life, the importance of theatre and acting, especially when you deel or are shackled, enclosed, devalued.
The end was most fitting!
Shame it is not a popular one.
Un triomphe!
"One day, is that not enough for you, one day he went dumb, one day I went blind, one day we'll go deaf, one day we were born, one day we shall die, the same day, the same second, is that not enough for you?" "I'm going." Samuel Beckett, Waiting for Godot.
The plot far below mediocre with a host of possibilities left untapped.
The expression of emotions (e.g. The depressive protagonist): simplistic and monotonous.
The content of dialogues: meaningless apart from one or two points.
The philosophical undertaking of concepts (such as Eros): non-existent, had to struggle even to make hypotheses.
The only interesting part was the presentation of certain objects and figures.
Overall, a waste of time.
The expression of emotions (e.g. The depressive protagonist): simplistic and monotonous.
The content of dialogues: meaningless apart from one or two points.
The philosophical undertaking of concepts (such as Eros): non-existent, had to struggle even to make hypotheses.
The only interesting part was the presentation of certain objects and figures.
Overall, a waste of time.
