petronius79
Entrou em dez. de 2006
Bem-vindo(a) ao novo perfil
Nossas atualizações ainda estão em desenvolvimento. Embora a versão anterior do perfil não esteja mais acessível, estamos trabalhando ativamente em melhorias, e alguns dos recursos ausentes retornarão em breve! Fique atento ao retorno deles. Enquanto isso, Análise de Classificação ainda está disponível em nossos aplicativos iOS e Android, encontrados na página de perfil. Para visualizar suas Distribuições de Classificação por ano e gênero, consulte nossa nova Guia de ajuda.
Selos2
Para saber como ganhar selos, acesse página de ajuda de selos.
Avaliações12
Classificação de petronius79
Avaliações11
Classificação de petronius79
I remember watching the original Lion King in my teens and then Simba's Pride on VHS. Few years ago I decided to cover lost ground and watched also Lion King 3, the TV series Timon and Pumbaa, the Lion Guard and the 2019 remake movie. And again both Lion King 1 and 2 in HD glory.
The movie Mufasa is easily the worst of all. You might say, this does not sound as bad since Lion King franchise equals quality all over, so a bad LK movie is good in comparison to other CGI cartoons. Unfortunately not in this case. Mufasa is not just a bad Lion King movie, it is a bad movie on its own.
My 9 year old nephew was watching it with his soccer team mates and told me that he was bored and his older mates were on their smart phones. But I too noticed a lot of commotion during the movie. Kids and parents would leave and come, climb the stairs up and down, go back and forth etc.
A clear sign that the movie failed to engage the audience or else this would not happen to such a large degree. In the end they applauded, though I am not sure because they liked it or because it finally finished and they could leave.
The 2019 movie had issues too but the main advantage was that they had the script of the original movie at their hands, so there was a saving grace at least. Still the design felt like uncanny valley.
Unfortunately when it comes to Mufasa, they had to start all over again. Though I think that if they chose to remake Simba's Pride on CGI instead, result would have been much better than this mess. At least it would have better songs.
There is a lot of incoherence here. Everything moves very fast, songs are inserted out of nowhere and with no preparation, plus they are forgettable. In fact it was the first time I hated listening to songs in Lion King. Even the kids songs in Lion Guard are 1000 times better than this.
Not only that, the script of the movie later on reminds me of the third season of the Lion Guard (just watch the intro and you'll understand). Also the finale of Mufasa tries to connect the story with the Lion Guard, so you should watch that afterwards, but before Simba's Pride.
When it comes to the art department, at least here animals are better depicted than in the 2019 movie and do not look so unsettling.
As for the reason Taka chose to act this way, I found it convincing but I had more issues with Mufasa's decision in the finale.
I did not have high expectations for the movie anyway but unfortunately as it turned out neither did the kids. There are much better CGI movies to spend your Christmas time with. Mufasa is not one of them.
The movie Mufasa is easily the worst of all. You might say, this does not sound as bad since Lion King franchise equals quality all over, so a bad LK movie is good in comparison to other CGI cartoons. Unfortunately not in this case. Mufasa is not just a bad Lion King movie, it is a bad movie on its own.
My 9 year old nephew was watching it with his soccer team mates and told me that he was bored and his older mates were on their smart phones. But I too noticed a lot of commotion during the movie. Kids and parents would leave and come, climb the stairs up and down, go back and forth etc.
A clear sign that the movie failed to engage the audience or else this would not happen to such a large degree. In the end they applauded, though I am not sure because they liked it or because it finally finished and they could leave.
The 2019 movie had issues too but the main advantage was that they had the script of the original movie at their hands, so there was a saving grace at least. Still the design felt like uncanny valley.
Unfortunately when it comes to Mufasa, they had to start all over again. Though I think that if they chose to remake Simba's Pride on CGI instead, result would have been much better than this mess. At least it would have better songs.
There is a lot of incoherence here. Everything moves very fast, songs are inserted out of nowhere and with no preparation, plus they are forgettable. In fact it was the first time I hated listening to songs in Lion King. Even the kids songs in Lion Guard are 1000 times better than this.
Not only that, the script of the movie later on reminds me of the third season of the Lion Guard (just watch the intro and you'll understand). Also the finale of Mufasa tries to connect the story with the Lion Guard, so you should watch that afterwards, but before Simba's Pride.
When it comes to the art department, at least here animals are better depicted than in the 2019 movie and do not look so unsettling.
As for the reason Taka chose to act this way, I found it convincing but I had more issues with Mufasa's decision in the finale.
I did not have high expectations for the movie anyway but unfortunately as it turned out neither did the kids. There are much better CGI movies to spend your Christmas time with. Mufasa is not one of them.
I must say there is quite a leap in character model animation quality, compared to 10 years ago regarding Pixar. The human models move and animate much more realistically compared to the first film. Same for their expressions.
Film tries to go a different route compared to the first film, exploring puberty and adolescence. And it could have succeeded if it were not for the 6 year age rating that severely limited such a possibility. Essentially the audience follows a middle school girl that feels like an elementary school girl.
I seriously expected some sort of bullying or cyber bullying later on the way the film went through, which would have made it much more dramatic. Also the friction with her parents is much less tense when compared to the first film, despite the fact she reached puberty.
In the first film she even has a short encounter with a boy in the finale. No such thing in the sequel and no love interest at all.
As a result all those extra emotions are not fully explored like in the first film. I'd say the first film explores the character of an elementary school kid in much more detail and more dramatically than the sequel does, when the character goes to middle school.
Film would have been better with an age rating of 10 years.
Film tries to go a different route compared to the first film, exploring puberty and adolescence. And it could have succeeded if it were not for the 6 year age rating that severely limited such a possibility. Essentially the audience follows a middle school girl that feels like an elementary school girl.
I seriously expected some sort of bullying or cyber bullying later on the way the film went through, which would have made it much more dramatic. Also the friction with her parents is much less tense when compared to the first film, despite the fact she reached puberty.
In the first film she even has a short encounter with a boy in the finale. No such thing in the sequel and no love interest at all.
As a result all those extra emotions are not fully explored like in the first film. I'd say the first film explores the character of an elementary school kid in much more detail and more dramatically than the sequel does, when the character goes to middle school.
Film would have been better with an age rating of 10 years.