dongray-30518
Entrou em jun. de 2020
Bem-vindo(a) ao novo perfil
Nossas atualizações ainda estão em desenvolvimento. Embora a versão anterior do perfil não esteja mais acessível, estamos trabalhando ativamente em melhorias, e alguns dos recursos ausentes retornarão em breve! Fique atento ao retorno deles. Enquanto isso, Análise de Classificação ainda está disponível em nossos aplicativos iOS e Android, encontrados na página de perfil. Para visualizar suas Distribuições de Classificação por ano e gênero, consulte nossa nova Guia de ajuda.
Selos3
Para saber como ganhar selos, acesse página de ajuda de selos.
Avaliações3
Classificação de dongray-30518
This is a story about a repressed kid and his family and his messed up relationships. It's also about learning to care about what you want to care about instead of just what everyone thinks you should care about.
This story's characters are generally sad and depressing in many ways. But it's about getting past that and learning to love life and those we meet for what it is.
It's a coming of age story that goes far beyond the problems each character has.
You won't get through this movie without feeling something. This movie is for anyone who feels they're not where they wanted to be in life or love. It can make you feel real low then lift you up with some comedic mishaps.
The acting is great from the entire cast. There are no car chases or CGI or adventures. There are sexual innuendos but nothing raunchy. Just really good story telling. With an overall message of caring.
This story's characters are generally sad and depressing in many ways. But it's about getting past that and learning to love life and those we meet for what it is.
It's a coming of age story that goes far beyond the problems each character has.
You won't get through this movie without feeling something. This movie is for anyone who feels they're not where they wanted to be in life or love. It can make you feel real low then lift you up with some comedic mishaps.
The acting is great from the entire cast. There are no car chases or CGI or adventures. There are sexual innuendos but nothing raunchy. Just really good story telling. With an overall message of caring.
Wow where to begin...
Nicolas Cage playing, without a doubt, one of the most intolerable people to listen to. He never shuts up, is very loud and inappropriate and has such a horrible nasal voice that it makes me irritable watching only a few minutes in. There are a few laughs but darn few. His character Gary is one of the most annoying I've ever seen or heard.
This is a story that is professed to be true. I call BS. It's completely exaggerated fiction. This lunatic would have been killed or he would have caused his own death long before he ever got there. And anyone forced to be in the same room with him for long would commit suicide or kill him to get away from him.
An awful story that wasn't funny 98% of the time. This movie is not worth sitting through. It's not funny. Its not well made. Just an awful waste of film!
This is a story that is professed to be true. I call BS. It's completely exaggerated fiction. This lunatic would have been killed or he would have caused his own death long before he ever got there. And anyone forced to be in the same room with him for long would commit suicide or kill him to get away from him.
An awful story that wasn't funny 98% of the time. This movie is not worth sitting through. It's not funny. Its not well made. Just an awful waste of film!
1st this is certainly not the first remake of the 1942 movie which was a bit of a different story and plot. While the 1942 movie was the original, it's usually the 1967 animated version from Disney that is best known. The 1967 one's plot has been done over and over especially in the 90s where several little kids TV versions and a badly chided movie were common. The first one was a great movie in it's 1940s time. Most people then thought it was great to be able to see all the animals. But now most people, jaded by better TV and movie productions no longer have interest in the really poor use of fake, stuffed animals used in the 1942 one.
This 2016 version was closest in plot to the 1967 animated musical which is the most popular version. This one is not nearly as musically inclined like the 1967 one was. The animal songs in the 1967 one were exceptionally great. Frankly, I hope to never have to hear Bill Murray sing again as he did in this version. It was absolutely the most awful singing of "Bare Necessities". It was just absolutely out of tune and no sense timing. Murray sang it like he was drunk or stoned. Of course he thought he was being cute and funny. But frankly he ruined his song. The well produced bluesy, jazzy numbers of the 1967 songs were mostly mutilated in this movie. The one pleasant exception was Christopher Walken's version of the "I wanna be like you song". He added ape sounds to just the right places in the song so you knew it was the ape's song. But still pales next to the 1967 singing.
The place the movie did excel was in the CGI creatures. The talking CGI animals were a great way to make the imagination grasp the crazy theme that is Jungle Book. That was a good deal better than the 1967 animations of the boy and animals jumping, hopping and climbing in very unrealistic animated ways. The plot was mostly the same as the 1967 one with only a few differences, mostly in it's ending.
There's not a lot of sense in fully discussing the plot of a title that has been done over and over again. Not much to give away here. Almost everyone has seen some similar version of the Jungle Book. Just read the movie descriptions and you'll get what you need to know. One thing about this version is some of the big name actors that signed on to do voices. Just look at IMDBs cast list and you're bound to see some very famous actors and comedians.
The problem with this movie isn't that it's a bad movie. It's not. But frankly I found myself wanting to go back and watch the much better 1967 animated musical version and did. If you are going to do a remake, you need to improve on the original as it will be compared with the other versions. And other than the CGI, this movie failed to be as good as the 1967 version it was modeled after.
This 2016 version was closest in plot to the 1967 animated musical which is the most popular version. This one is not nearly as musically inclined like the 1967 one was. The animal songs in the 1967 one were exceptionally great. Frankly, I hope to never have to hear Bill Murray sing again as he did in this version. It was absolutely the most awful singing of "Bare Necessities". It was just absolutely out of tune and no sense timing. Murray sang it like he was drunk or stoned. Of course he thought he was being cute and funny. But frankly he ruined his song. The well produced bluesy, jazzy numbers of the 1967 songs were mostly mutilated in this movie. The one pleasant exception was Christopher Walken's version of the "I wanna be like you song". He added ape sounds to just the right places in the song so you knew it was the ape's song. But still pales next to the 1967 singing.
The place the movie did excel was in the CGI creatures. The talking CGI animals were a great way to make the imagination grasp the crazy theme that is Jungle Book. That was a good deal better than the 1967 animations of the boy and animals jumping, hopping and climbing in very unrealistic animated ways. The plot was mostly the same as the 1967 one with only a few differences, mostly in it's ending.
There's not a lot of sense in fully discussing the plot of a title that has been done over and over again. Not much to give away here. Almost everyone has seen some similar version of the Jungle Book. Just read the movie descriptions and you'll get what you need to know. One thing about this version is some of the big name actors that signed on to do voices. Just look at IMDBs cast list and you're bound to see some very famous actors and comedians.
The problem with this movie isn't that it's a bad movie. It's not. But frankly I found myself wanting to go back and watch the much better 1967 animated musical version and did. If you are going to do a remake, you need to improve on the original as it will be compared with the other versions. And other than the CGI, this movie failed to be as good as the 1967 version it was modeled after.