grandcosmo
Entrou em abr. de 2001
Bem-vindo(a) ao novo perfil
Nossas atualizações ainda estão em desenvolvimento. Embora a versão anterior do perfil não esteja mais acessível, estamos trabalhando ativamente em melhorias, e alguns dos recursos ausentes retornarão em breve! Fique atento ao retorno deles. Enquanto isso, Análise de Classificação ainda está disponível em nossos aplicativos iOS e Android, encontrados na página de perfil. Para visualizar suas Distribuições de Classificação por ano e gênero, consulte nossa nova Guia de ajuda.
Selos3
Para saber como ganhar selos, acesse página de ajuda de selos.
Avaliações6
Classificação de grandcosmo
Even though she is billed third behind Lamour and MacMurray, Betty Hutton walks away with the picture. The plot is as old as the hills but the by play of the four Angel sisters is very amusing.
But the reason to watch the film is Betty Hutton. She is adorable in this film, has a couple of funny novelty musical numbers in addition to the ones she sings with her "sisters" and does a drunk scene that is one of the most hilarious that I have ever seen. Lamour had to do one later in the film and I felt sorry for her having to follow Hutton's performance.
But the reason to watch the film is Betty Hutton. She is adorable in this film, has a couple of funny novelty musical numbers in addition to the ones she sings with her "sisters" and does a drunk scene that is one of the most hilarious that I have ever seen. Lamour had to do one later in the film and I felt sorry for her having to follow Hutton's performance.
Anyone who says that Judy Garland would have been better than Betty Hutton in the role of Annie Oakley either didn't see the outtakes of Garland or saw something that wasn't there. At that time in her life Judy Garland would not have brought to the role anything approaching the energy that Hutton brings to it.
Hutton was truly fantastic in the role and it is too bad that the experience was so bad for her but the backstory makes her performance seem even better. If Keel treated her as badly as Hutton claims then he should be ashamed of himself.
There are many great songs in the picture but to me the musical highlight of the film is the "You Can't Get A Man With A Gun" number. Hutton does such a great job on the number that I can't think of another actress who could have approached it. Robert Osborne on TCM said that when he saw the film in Seattle the audience broke into loud applause after that number.
The only weak part of the film is Calhern. Ordinarily I like his work but as Buffalo Bill he lacks the energy and charisma that the role requires.
Hutton was truly fantastic in the role and it is too bad that the experience was so bad for her but the backstory makes her performance seem even better. If Keel treated her as badly as Hutton claims then he should be ashamed of himself.
There are many great songs in the picture but to me the musical highlight of the film is the "You Can't Get A Man With A Gun" number. Hutton does such a great job on the number that I can't think of another actress who could have approached it. Robert Osborne on TCM said that when he saw the film in Seattle the audience broke into loud applause after that number.
The only weak part of the film is Calhern. Ordinarily I like his work but as Buffalo Bill he lacks the energy and charisma that the role requires.
I have to disagree with the person who said that Joan Crawford shined in this film and that it was a hit. She didn't and it wasn't. Also I think Crawford would have been completely miscast in My Man Godfrey.
What this film is is an amusing tale with Powell (as always), Montgomery and Frank Morgan all very good.
To see this type of story done right I would suggest watching Lubitsch's wonderful and unsurpassed Trouble in Paradise.
What this film is is an amusing tale with Powell (as always), Montgomery and Frank Morgan all very good.
To see this type of story done right I would suggest watching Lubitsch's wonderful and unsurpassed Trouble in Paradise.
Enquetes respondidas recentemente
5 pesquisas respondidas no total
