TerminalMan

...but that by no means makes it good or even mediocre. This doesn't rise to "complete crap" status. And that's the fascinating part: it's such a non-movie that you keep watching and waiting for something to happen so the movie can get started. But it never does. It actively avoids everything...period. I can't stress enough that isn't an exaggeration, this lack-of-a-movie avoids it's own characters and plot, even just abandoning them completely by the side of the road and goes for a long, slow drive through the countryside. Yes, that literally happens, it's actually a pretty succinct summary of the entire 70 or minute runtime.

The most interesting thing about the whole thing comes from the fact that it was made at all: who thought this was a good enough idea to make a movie? Who heard the pitch and invested real, actual money to make it happen? How can an absolute absence of story and characters and events be anything but boring? Was this just another attempt to scam the foreign video market with a fake movie made for $20 and a tank of gas?

If nothing else, "Invasion" raises a lot of questions. "Can't there be an IMDb rating BELOW 1?", for example.

Ahh, yet another 'sandbox' game! Basically, the story (if you want to call it that) is: you must single-handedly liberate an entire country and kill the current dictator. Given that you can roam around approximately 400 square miles, this should have made a halfway decent game. HOWEVER, once you factor in abysmal player and NPC animations, unbelievably buggy scripting, baffling level design, bizarre and laughable physics, endlessly repetitive missions, almost no enemy AI, long outdated graphics, etc. etc., you are left with a boring, antiquated-before-it-was-even-released game that is sure to disappoint. To call this game a pile of...you know what...is slandering that very substance. I give this a 1/10, simply because IMDb doesn't have a lower rating. Avoid at all costs.