Jazmataz1980
Entrou em jun. de 2006
Bem-vindo(a) ao novo perfil
Nossas atualizações ainda estão em desenvolvimento. Embora a versão anterior do perfil não esteja mais acessível, estamos trabalhando ativamente em melhorias, e alguns dos recursos ausentes retornarão em breve! Fique atento ao retorno deles. Enquanto isso, Análise de Classificação ainda está disponível em nossos aplicativos iOS e Android, encontrados na página de perfil. Para visualizar suas Distribuições de Classificação por ano e gênero, consulte nossa nova Guia de ajuda.
Selos3
Para saber como ganhar selos, acesse página de ajuda de selos.
Avaliações14
Classificação de Jazmataz1980
Season eight drags on quite a bit. Therefore, the episode of the gang getting analyzed was a breath of fresh air. For me personally, delivering the most laughs of all of Season 8 yet. The show's creators should write another episode with the therapist because she was the perfect foil for the gang's insanity.
The gang wants a decision from the therapist on who should do the dishes after sharing a meal together, and chaos ensues. Each one in the gang gets an individual session, revealing more about themselves than they had planned to. Except for maybe Charlie who is an open book. Without giving anything away, I would say that therapist will come to regret her decision to try to help the gang.
The gang wants a decision from the therapist on who should do the dishes after sharing a meal together, and chaos ensues. Each one in the gang gets an individual session, revealing more about themselves than they had planned to. Except for maybe Charlie who is an open book. Without giving anything away, I would say that therapist will come to regret her decision to try to help the gang.
Gus has no luck selling his art, due to the fact that he has nothing to sell it with: he is neither homosexual nor crazy, he is not drug-addicted or troubled in any other way (besides being very unsuccessful as an artist). Good luck that there are thieves who turn into very gifted artist representatives, PIs who can fake identities and art critics who still recognize art when they see it. Really?? Besides my biggest question - what is the point of this story - I wonder why anyone would cast Chris Eigeman as a lead character??? He looks like my bookie and has the charisma of my shoe vendor next door. The movie reminds me to never ever watch movies made by NY intellectuals who cannot imagine any kind of normal world but always feel an urge to portray rich, intellectual or artistic people and their non-problems. Please refer to the just as non-appealing movie "Motherhood" (2009, starring Uma Thurman) to know what I mean.
Enquetes respondidas recentemente
2 pesquisas respondidas no total