chldofthe80s

My friends and I chose this randomly from a list on pay per view. Mostly because Jennifer. Lawrence was listed in the credits. And that was Mis-leading - she was only in one flashback scene And did not have any lines. I wish that I get could my time back that I wasted watching this - and the $4.99 rental fee. Bad acting , bad editing,confusing storyline. The only good part in the entire movie is when it finally ended !

Why would Jennifer Lawrence even have ave her name attached to this is beyond me. Don't bother renting it - I would have rated it ZERO but 1 was the lowest score.

I think that perhaps if they would have made this a full length as opposed to the short, it probably could have been better. It is unique, and has some humorous parts. I especially enjoyed the scene with Trent Gill in a tu-tu throwing whipped cream at his girl friend. He is so funny. It's worth watching just to see this! And as usual, Danielle Panabaker is great. She (in my opinion) is going to be the next Julia Roberts. She is very talented. So, if you get the chance to check out this short, it is definitely worth your time. Great concept, well done, talented actors, just wish it would have been full length. But, like I said ; check it out for your self. You won't be disappointed.

Okay, here's a great idea...let's take another famous person's sibling that is untalented as can be (aka: Jamie ) and make a show for them too. If she wasn't related to "Auntie Julia" then she probably wouldn't even have got an audition! The sad thing is that Producers actually think that people will continue to watch this garbage just because they put some one who is related to a known star in it. Bad news! If it's bad...then it doesn't matter! I would rather watch something with a group of "un-knowns" that at least know how to act! Oh yea and by the way:(news flash) Having an attitude doesn't mean someone CAN ACT!!! I know, let's make a show with all of Demi Moore's girl in it!