dimitrakopoulost
Entrou em abr. de 2023
Bem-vindo(a) ao novo perfil
Nossas atualizações ainda estão em desenvolvimento. Embora a versão anterior do perfil não esteja mais acessível, estamos trabalhando ativamente em melhorias, e alguns dos recursos ausentes retornarão em breve! Fique atento ao retorno deles. Enquanto isso, Análise de Classificação ainda está disponível em nossos aplicativos iOS e Android, encontrados na página de perfil. Para visualizar suas Distribuições de Classificação por ano e gênero, consulte nossa nova Guia de ajuda.
Selos3
Para saber como ganhar selos, acesse página de ajuda de selos.
Avaliações7
Classificação de dimitrakopoulost
Angelopoulos was talentless. He made movies that were copies of the cinema of Antonioni and Tarkovsky. He was lucky, because he started making films, when the greek junta fell and he became the leader of avant- garde cinems in Greece. During a period of artistic tolerance, he was able to express the anxieties of a society deeply troubled. He had obsession, like the Greek Civil War (1946-1949) or the fate and the future of Marxism. This is one of his worst movies. Two children, who are illegitimate, begin a journey heading for Germany, because their mother told them that there lives their father. It is a naive allegory. A boring film. A waste of time.
Monsieur Heynemann is rather prolific. He has created over 30 films since the late '70s, but this is the first of his films that I saw. I suppose that he is a director with political concerns, since many of his movies are about the German Occupation, a rather popular subject for french artists. A woman in love with Leo Bloom, the legendary socialist political leader, follows him after the defeat of the french army wherever he goes. It is rather natural, as far as she loved him, since she was a teenager. Everything is pretentious, boring and dull. We watch people talking about the war in luxurious villas. All the characters are shallow and false. This is a movie for people who know nothing about cinema and politics.
Leonard Keigel made a few movies, and everyone must be grateful about this. The movie QUI ? Is probably his best, so we can't say that he had many things to give. Nevertheless he was co-founder of Cahiers de Cinema, so he managed to sit on director's seat a few times and have some fun. He was only having fun, nothing else.
It is rather difficult to judge this movie. There is nothing to be judged. The plot is trivial, the actors just say their words, the director doesn't do anything. His target is to create a film in the style of Chabrol and Clouzot, but he only manages to create a very-very long commercial.
Don't watch this movie. It's terrible !
It is rather difficult to judge this movie. There is nothing to be judged. The plot is trivial, the actors just say their words, the director doesn't do anything. His target is to create a film in the style of Chabrol and Clouzot, but he only manages to create a very-very long commercial.
Don't watch this movie. It's terrible !