filmster1
Entrou em jan. de 2002
Bem-vindo(a) ao novo perfil
Nossas atualizações ainda estão em desenvolvimento. Embora a versão anterior do perfil não esteja mais acessível, estamos trabalhando ativamente em melhorias, e alguns dos recursos ausentes retornarão em breve! Fique atento ao retorno deles. Enquanto isso, Análise de Classificação ainda está disponível em nossos aplicativos iOS e Android, encontrados na página de perfil. Para visualizar suas Distribuições de Classificação por ano e gênero, consulte nossa nova Guia de ajuda.
Selos2
Para saber como ganhar selos, acesse página de ajuda de selos.
Avaliações8
Classificação de filmster1
Definitely a watershed work that changed movies forever. A brilliant shocker that gets your blood boiling every time you watch it.
Many people waste too much time over-analysing this movie, trying to find its hidden meaning or message. Of course many of their interpretations are valid, some of which are even profound. However in my opinion, they have missed the point. This is not "1984" or "Faust" for crying out loud. The filmmaker's real intention is just to shock and disturb with graphic depictions of the ugliness and grotesqueness of the primal animal instincts of human nature. And on that alone, Kubrick succeeded brilliantly and gives the film a legitimate claim to being the best movie ever made. As for the message, if there is one, it's not important and who cares. It is just an ultra-violent movie made some thirty years ago when the moviegoers were still watching "The Sound of Music" and "My Fair Lady". Surprisingly thirty years later, it has not aged that much and still retained much of its shock value. Now folks, forget about the message and just enjoy the movie for what it is and be shocked and disturbed.
A true ass kicker and arguably the best movie ever made. But be forewarned, definitely not one for the under-aged and the squeamish. 10/10.
Many people waste too much time over-analysing this movie, trying to find its hidden meaning or message. Of course many of their interpretations are valid, some of which are even profound. However in my opinion, they have missed the point. This is not "1984" or "Faust" for crying out loud. The filmmaker's real intention is just to shock and disturb with graphic depictions of the ugliness and grotesqueness of the primal animal instincts of human nature. And on that alone, Kubrick succeeded brilliantly and gives the film a legitimate claim to being the best movie ever made. As for the message, if there is one, it's not important and who cares. It is just an ultra-violent movie made some thirty years ago when the moviegoers were still watching "The Sound of Music" and "My Fair Lady". Surprisingly thirty years later, it has not aged that much and still retained much of its shock value. Now folks, forget about the message and just enjoy the movie for what it is and be shocked and disturbed.
A true ass kicker and arguably the best movie ever made. But be forewarned, definitely not one for the under-aged and the squeamish. 10/10.
I thought the movie starts out quite strong, but it soon gets unfocused and buried in its many subplots. It's a great idea to tell several stories at the same time, but the problem here is that it does not even have one interesting story line. The result is a giant collage of boring subplots, which do not even come together well at the end.
I myself don't find anything interesting about celebrities cheating on their spouses or spouses cheating on them and incest has lost its shock value eons ago. Hasn't anybody seen a Jerry Springer show before? Let's not confuse junk with art. Junk is simply junk.
If there is one bright spot in the movie, it's Aimee Mann's music. It suits the theme well.
A colossal waste of time. Would have been 6/10 had it been shorter, but at 188 minutes, it's 100 minutes too long and it's only worth 5/10.
I myself don't find anything interesting about celebrities cheating on their spouses or spouses cheating on them and incest has lost its shock value eons ago. Hasn't anybody seen a Jerry Springer show before? Let's not confuse junk with art. Junk is simply junk.
If there is one bright spot in the movie, it's Aimee Mann's music. It suits the theme well.
A colossal waste of time. Would have been 6/10 had it been shorter, but at 188 minutes, it's 100 minutes too long and it's only worth 5/10.