Tarntarow
Entrou em mar. de 2007
Bem-vindo(a) ao novo perfil
Nossas atualizações ainda estão em desenvolvimento. Embora a versão anterior do perfil não esteja mais acessível, estamos trabalhando ativamente em melhorias, e alguns dos recursos ausentes retornarão em breve! Fique atento ao retorno deles. Enquanto isso, Análise de Classificação ainda está disponível em nossos aplicativos iOS e Android, encontrados na página de perfil. Para visualizar suas Distribuições de Classificação por ano e gênero, consulte nossa nova Guia de ajuda.
Selos2
Para saber como ganhar selos, acesse página de ajuda de selos.
Avaliações103
Classificação de Tarntarow
I suppose simply having Ice Cube/T? In the movie is supposed to be a selling point. It worked: I decided not to buy. Watched it.
I can see making a film if its better, but this is just pure junk. I don't see any continuity in this, just a bunch of scenes. They simply jump from Ice T watching a screen of disaster scenes taking place in other cities. It is sublimely stupid movie, but if you want to watch it just to pass time, go right ahead.
Regardless of that, Ice Cube is a lousy actor: he just curses and acts angry as he does in every film he is in. I suppose they only wanted a misanthropic protagonist with unappreciable acting skills. Well, that's exactly what they got (and continue to get in nearly every movie he is in).
The original remains the best, despite it not appealing to people who need distractions on the screen every 5 minutes. Sometimes, less technology makes for a better film. This is one of those times.
I can see making a film if its better, but this is just pure junk. I don't see any continuity in this, just a bunch of scenes. They simply jump from Ice T watching a screen of disaster scenes taking place in other cities. It is sublimely stupid movie, but if you want to watch it just to pass time, go right ahead.
Regardless of that, Ice Cube is a lousy actor: he just curses and acts angry as he does in every film he is in. I suppose they only wanted a misanthropic protagonist with unappreciable acting skills. Well, that's exactly what they got (and continue to get in nearly every movie he is in).
The original remains the best, despite it not appealing to people who need distractions on the screen every 5 minutes. Sometimes, less technology makes for a better film. This is one of those times.
I don't know how to write a 600 character review for a movie that is so poorly done.
This is a genuiney insipid (dumb) movie. The leads are foolish almost from the start. Blondie develops a case of envy because her friend is placed where SHE wanted to be, so she turns evil because she's pouting that her friend got a better deal than her. She's a 14 year old, and that's what one expects. The whole movie is based on her feeling she was put in the wrong place so now everyone is going to suffer.
Poor acting, the two main leads are as wooden as a tree, with NO nuance. And the rest of the film is so banal, it could be watched with one eye on one's smartphone (where most people tend to keep their eyes these days). Boring. Banal. BAD.
I'm happy others like it, but it still has no substance.
This is a genuiney insipid (dumb) movie. The leads are foolish almost from the start. Blondie develops a case of envy because her friend is placed where SHE wanted to be, so she turns evil because she's pouting that her friend got a better deal than her. She's a 14 year old, and that's what one expects. The whole movie is based on her feeling she was put in the wrong place so now everyone is going to suffer.
Poor acting, the two main leads are as wooden as a tree, with NO nuance. And the rest of the film is so banal, it could be watched with one eye on one's smartphone (where most people tend to keep their eyes these days). Boring. Banal. BAD.
I'm happy others like it, but it still has no substance.
So, it's a junk movie.
What that means is it's poorly written. As usual, if you were listening to this, you could not tell that this was around 900 AD. It sounds as though the script was written for people in the 21st century. This is an ongoing issue with scripts: people from 900 AD sound like some kid in 2025.
The movie is a hodgepodge of supernatural elements. And the actress who plays the lead looks just like the actress who played a demon in Season Of The Witch.
The plot moves quite slowly (and being older, when an OLD person tells you the movie is slow, you should consider that if you want your movies to be over in 100 minutes.
Tedious. Boring.
What that means is it's poorly written. As usual, if you were listening to this, you could not tell that this was around 900 AD. It sounds as though the script was written for people in the 21st century. This is an ongoing issue with scripts: people from 900 AD sound like some kid in 2025.
The movie is a hodgepodge of supernatural elements. And the actress who plays the lead looks just like the actress who played a demon in Season Of The Witch.
The plot moves quite slowly (and being older, when an OLD person tells you the movie is slow, you should consider that if you want your movies to be over in 100 minutes.
Tedious. Boring.