Allan-14
Entrou em jan. de 2001
Bem-vindo(a) ao novo perfil
Nossas atualizações ainda estão em desenvolvimento. Embora a versão anterior do perfil não esteja mais acessível, estamos trabalhando ativamente em melhorias, e alguns dos recursos ausentes retornarão em breve! Fique atento ao retorno deles. Enquanto isso, Análise de Classificação ainda está disponível em nossos aplicativos iOS e Android, encontrados na página de perfil. Para visualizar suas Distribuições de Classificação por ano e gênero, consulte nossa nova Guia de ajuda.
Selos4
Para saber como ganhar selos, acesse página de ajuda de selos.
Avaliações20
Classificação de Allan-14
Finally... FINALLY, a STAR TREK film is made that fulfills EXACTLY what fans and critics of the franchise alike have been clamoring for ages to happen: a big screen adventure that without a doubt must be seen on the big screen. And what happens?! It gets panned, that's what!!!
First off, Paramount should have released it at least a week earlier. It would have had a chance that way to earn some decent money. By putting it out just five days before THE TWO TOWERS, they basically wasted their $40 million marketing campaign.
Second... I've heard many criticisms that the TNG films have been little more than elaborate, big budget TV movies. Oye. OK, guys, listen. STAR TREK started out on TV. That's where it evolved from. The movies, as much money and talent as they're able to spend, still must exist in the same UNIVERSE. That means that, yes, in a Star Trek MOVIE, you need to still have the frickin' ENTERPRISE. There still must be a BRIDGE. We still need to have PICARD and friends. And you can't not have a warp core, no matter how much you want to make people think this in no way reminds you of the TV series.
The deal is this: NEMESIS looks absolutely terrific. The effects are far and away the best to date in a Trek film (and superior to most other films showcasing CGI of late). There are some terrific action set pieces, and the interplay is everything you'd come to expect- and more- from the TNG cast.
There's an overwhelming criticism that the film is "underlit." Obviously these thick skulls don't appreciate or at least recognize the fact that the filmmakers are paying heavy (and effective) homage to classic European horror films. I guess the NOSFERATU reference with the Remans wasn't enough to spark that memory, but then again, many of these critics probably don't know what NOSFERATU is.
NEMESIS has the unique distinction of becoming the lowest-grossing TREK movie ever (which without a doubt means the end of the series) but also being amongst the best of all ten films. It may not have the narrative pull that made FIRST CONTACT and WRATH OF KHAN the best Trek movies ever, but it's close, and I'm happy to say that in spite of a Trekked-out majority vote, it pleased me just fine to see Picard and co. make it so just one last time.
The Next Generation has gone out with a BANG. I heard it. I guess everyone who built up the negative buzz needs to get their hearing checked.
THE MOTION PICTURE: *1/2
THE WRATH OF KHAN: ****
THE SEARCH FOR SPOCK: **1/2
THE VOYAGE HOME: ***
THE FINAL FRONTIER: **
THE UNDISCOVERED COUNTRY: ***
GENERATIONS: **1/2
FIRST CONTACT: ****
INSURRECTION: **
NEMESIS: ***1/2
First off, Paramount should have released it at least a week earlier. It would have had a chance that way to earn some decent money. By putting it out just five days before THE TWO TOWERS, they basically wasted their $40 million marketing campaign.
Second... I've heard many criticisms that the TNG films have been little more than elaborate, big budget TV movies. Oye. OK, guys, listen. STAR TREK started out on TV. That's where it evolved from. The movies, as much money and talent as they're able to spend, still must exist in the same UNIVERSE. That means that, yes, in a Star Trek MOVIE, you need to still have the frickin' ENTERPRISE. There still must be a BRIDGE. We still need to have PICARD and friends. And you can't not have a warp core, no matter how much you want to make people think this in no way reminds you of the TV series.
The deal is this: NEMESIS looks absolutely terrific. The effects are far and away the best to date in a Trek film (and superior to most other films showcasing CGI of late). There are some terrific action set pieces, and the interplay is everything you'd come to expect- and more- from the TNG cast.
There's an overwhelming criticism that the film is "underlit." Obviously these thick skulls don't appreciate or at least recognize the fact that the filmmakers are paying heavy (and effective) homage to classic European horror films. I guess the NOSFERATU reference with the Remans wasn't enough to spark that memory, but then again, many of these critics probably don't know what NOSFERATU is.
NEMESIS has the unique distinction of becoming the lowest-grossing TREK movie ever (which without a doubt means the end of the series) but also being amongst the best of all ten films. It may not have the narrative pull that made FIRST CONTACT and WRATH OF KHAN the best Trek movies ever, but it's close, and I'm happy to say that in spite of a Trekked-out majority vote, it pleased me just fine to see Picard and co. make it so just one last time.
The Next Generation has gone out with a BANG. I heard it. I guess everyone who built up the negative buzz needs to get their hearing checked.
THE MOTION PICTURE: *1/2
THE WRATH OF KHAN: ****
THE SEARCH FOR SPOCK: **1/2
THE VOYAGE HOME: ***
THE FINAL FRONTIER: **
THE UNDISCOVERED COUNTRY: ***
GENERATIONS: **1/2
FIRST CONTACT: ****
INSURRECTION: **
NEMESIS: ***1/2
This is the worst film I have seen in a very, very long time. Perhaps EVER. As an independent filmmaker (currently at work on my first major feature length movie, CONQUEST OF AREA 52), I know how hard it is to make movies with little to spend. But I was making better movies as a Sophomore in high school with $50 in my wallet as a budget than this pathetic excuse for a "movie." I'm not sure if I have ever seen a movie shot this poorly or with such little ambition, creativity, or craft. It looks like it was shot on Hi-8 Video (I shoot in DV and would be shocked if this was actually DV), and to no good effect. The "props" and "mask" in the film look very familiar... like I just saw them at my local Spencer's. The script lacks wit, and the performances do nothing to help it. And did I mention this has got to be the WORST camerawork I have ever seen (with the exception of BLAIR WITCH, which was SUPPOSED to look the way it did, and my family's home movies)?! There is no sense of logic or craft to how it was shot, whoever was at the helm must have been asleep at the wheel or he really just did not care what it looked like. There is no indication in this film that the cameraman had any idea what words like "framing" or "composition" meant.
The fact that our serial killer Quiltface is able to stand 20 feet from several people in the middle of the open desert and not be seen does NOT work in any fashion- camp nor horror- and best explains the rest of the movie.
I'm sorry, makers of "Carnage Road" (or "Carnage: The Legend of Quiltface" as the video cover says), but if you ever go out and try to make a movie again, please, PLLLEEEEASE do it with a little care, if not TALENT.
At least Ed Wood could have made this fun to watch.
The fact that our serial killer Quiltface is able to stand 20 feet from several people in the middle of the open desert and not be seen does NOT work in any fashion- camp nor horror- and best explains the rest of the movie.
I'm sorry, makers of "Carnage Road" (or "Carnage: The Legend of Quiltface" as the video cover says), but if you ever go out and try to make a movie again, please, PLLLEEEEASE do it with a little care, if not TALENT.
At least Ed Wood could have made this fun to watch.
I have not yet read the book "The Hobbit," but considering the fact that I'm about to see "Fellowship of the Ring" on the big screen without having any prior knowledge of the Tolkien universe, I figured renting it may be a good place to be introduced (somewhat) to the mythos. Oops.
What a horrendous production this was. The songs, the songs that begin and end in approximately one sentence after often-times meaningless points, the choppy animation, the score itself... ugh. Perhaps the worst part of the whole thing was toward the end, when the music plays so loudly that in fact it drowns out all the dialogue. I don't know if this was a result of the video transfer people falling asleep at the wheel while mixing sound, but it just made the movie that much worse. Thankfully, I believe Tolkien was deceased before it was broadcast, so at least he didn't have to bare it.
Good points? Um... well, the underlying story seemed to have promise. The execution was a miserable failure. And what's with the high rating of 6.5 on the imdb? Are there really fans out there of this torrid musical?!
If you like bad animation, songs that interrupt with the flow of a film worse than any recent Disney film, and music that plays so loud you can't hear people talk, this "Hobbit" is the movie for you.
What a horrendous production this was. The songs, the songs that begin and end in approximately one sentence after often-times meaningless points, the choppy animation, the score itself... ugh. Perhaps the worst part of the whole thing was toward the end, when the music plays so loudly that in fact it drowns out all the dialogue. I don't know if this was a result of the video transfer people falling asleep at the wheel while mixing sound, but it just made the movie that much worse. Thankfully, I believe Tolkien was deceased before it was broadcast, so at least he didn't have to bare it.
Good points? Um... well, the underlying story seemed to have promise. The execution was a miserable failure. And what's with the high rating of 6.5 on the imdb? Are there really fans out there of this torrid musical?!
If you like bad animation, songs that interrupt with the flow of a film worse than any recent Disney film, and music that plays so loud you can't hear people talk, this "Hobbit" is the movie for you.