me-17
Entrou em abr. de 2000
Bem-vindo(a) ao novo perfil
Nossas atualizações ainda estão em desenvolvimento. Embora a versão anterior do perfil não esteja mais acessível, estamos trabalhando ativamente em melhorias, e alguns dos recursos ausentes retornarão em breve! Fique atento ao retorno deles. Enquanto isso, Análise de Classificação ainda está disponível em nossos aplicativos iOS e Android, encontrados na página de perfil. Para visualizar suas Distribuições de Classificação por ano e gênero, consulte nossa nova Guia de ajuda.
Selos2
Para saber como ganhar selos, acesse página de ajuda de selos.
Avaliações12
Classificação de me-17
Thin Red Line is without a doubt one of the worst war movies ever. Why? Because of WHEN it was set, using the story that was used. The whole problem can be summed up by "why are we here?" In short, the main charachters felt that they are in a horrible situation that no one should have to be in. And they question why.
This plot would do very well in a Vietnam era film. But this was World War Two. The "good war." No war is good, and I'm sure that the soldiers on Guadalcanal hated being there, but I don't think any of them EVER questioned WHY they were there. They were there because the US had been attacked. They were there because of the Japanese and Pearl Harbor. Though unrelated, one could even say that They were there because Hitler had declared war on the US. World War two was the last war that the US fought that REALLY had a sense of purpose. We were in the right and we knew it. People don't want to see a move about the greatest generation questioning their worth and values. It just isn't realistic. Even though it is a bit hokey and doesn't reflect the reality of the last mission, Memphis Belle is what people want, and reflects more the reality of the war and the men's attitudes toward it, I think.
Do yourself a favor and leave this miserable piece of revisionist propaganda on the shelf.
This plot would do very well in a Vietnam era film. But this was World War Two. The "good war." No war is good, and I'm sure that the soldiers on Guadalcanal hated being there, but I don't think any of them EVER questioned WHY they were there. They were there because the US had been attacked. They were there because of the Japanese and Pearl Harbor. Though unrelated, one could even say that They were there because Hitler had declared war on the US. World War two was the last war that the US fought that REALLY had a sense of purpose. We were in the right and we knew it. People don't want to see a move about the greatest generation questioning their worth and values. It just isn't realistic. Even though it is a bit hokey and doesn't reflect the reality of the last mission, Memphis Belle is what people want, and reflects more the reality of the war and the men's attitudes toward it, I think.
Do yourself a favor and leave this miserable piece of revisionist propaganda on the shelf.
I was impressed with Fellowship and Two Towers in terms of cinematics, visuals, action scenes, and so on. However, in both films, key elements are left out. Two towers left out fewer though, and I liked the approach of skipping back and forth between Sam/Frodo and the rest of the group, whereas the book presents the rescuing of Merry/Pippin in the first half, and Sam and Frodo's quest in the second. That said however, there are SO many details left out from both films so far that it is like watching a movie based on the cliff notes of the book. If the viewer REALLY wants to know what is going on, he needs to read The Hobbit, and preferably also the Silmarillion, as both set the scene for the trilogy seen here. Nonetheless, a great movie on its own, worthy of an 8 or 9.