mattwakeman
Entrou em set. de 2000
Bem-vindo(a) ao novo perfil
Nossas atualizações ainda estão em desenvolvimento. Embora a versão anterior do perfil não esteja mais acessível, estamos trabalhando ativamente em melhorias, e alguns dos recursos ausentes retornarão em breve! Fique atento ao retorno deles. Enquanto isso, Análise de Classificação ainda está disponível em nossos aplicativos iOS e Android, encontrados na página de perfil. Para visualizar suas Distribuições de Classificação por ano e gênero, consulte nossa nova Guia de ajuda.
Selos2
Para saber como ganhar selos, acesse página de ajuda de selos.
Avaliações34
Classificação de mattwakeman
the problem being that the film is somewhat uneven and praises art much more then it deserves. of course it is impossible to imagine that the makers of a film could ever see art as being anything less than all powerful.
what we are left with though is the feeling that if only Hitler had been allowed to put on a show then 50 million people may well have lived. this is both patronising and quite improbable. there are a couple of notable scenes, when Hitler explains how politics will become art (a nice twist from the usual 'art is political') and when he gives his first speech (truly gripping and you can feel the power of rhetoric) but this is a disjointed odd film. the comparisons between good and ill are just too hamfisted to work and the whole film feels slightly undercooked.
it is of interest but no more and as many other people have said the shadow of Mel Brooks and 'The Producers' looms large. Average...
what we are left with though is the feeling that if only Hitler had been allowed to put on a show then 50 million people may well have lived. this is both patronising and quite improbable. there are a couple of notable scenes, when Hitler explains how politics will become art (a nice twist from the usual 'art is political') and when he gives his first speech (truly gripping and you can feel the power of rhetoric) but this is a disjointed odd film. the comparisons between good and ill are just too hamfisted to work and the whole film feels slightly undercooked.
it is of interest but no more and as many other people have said the shadow of Mel Brooks and 'The Producers' looms large. Average...
simply fantastic. one of, if not the, most visceral films that i have ever had the pleasure to sit through. enough has been said about the cgi effects of gollum or the battle at helm's deep but what greater praise can you give a film like this except to say that it was as good as the fellowship of the ring.
unreal.
unreal.
well lets be fair. the first hour and a half arent confused and messy. not that im saying that they are original either, but they are ok. but then...but then instead of having the courage to end the film on a bleak downward note george gives us more film...and more film...and more film.
the end is simply horrific although at times it seems that spielberg just didnt know what type of film to give us (should it be all action? or maybe some comedy, hold on, now we need some suspense). the film should (IMHO) have been hard and bleak and fast and instead we are given a dribble ending that was just really so very poor.
phil k dick must shudder at what is done to his works (even the very good blade runner is simply nothing when compared to 'do androids dream of electric sheep?') and in many ways this film said nothing that hadnt already been said by stanley kubrick (nee anthony burgess) in clockwork orange over 30 years ago.
loads of reviews keep saying how this is the new 'dark' spielberg. to me, this was just the same cloying, sentimental, hamfisted spielberg.
the end is simply horrific although at times it seems that spielberg just didnt know what type of film to give us (should it be all action? or maybe some comedy, hold on, now we need some suspense). the film should (IMHO) have been hard and bleak and fast and instead we are given a dribble ending that was just really so very poor.
phil k dick must shudder at what is done to his works (even the very good blade runner is simply nothing when compared to 'do androids dream of electric sheep?') and in many ways this film said nothing that hadnt already been said by stanley kubrick (nee anthony burgess) in clockwork orange over 30 years ago.
loads of reviews keep saying how this is the new 'dark' spielberg. to me, this was just the same cloying, sentimental, hamfisted spielberg.