The Overdrama
Entrou em dez. de 1999
Bem-vindo(a) ao novo perfil
Nossas atualizações ainda estão em desenvolvimento. Embora a versão anterior do perfil não esteja mais acessível, estamos trabalhando ativamente em melhorias, e alguns dos recursos ausentes retornarão em breve! Fique atento ao retorno deles. Enquanto isso, Análise de Classificação ainda está disponível em nossos aplicativos iOS e Android, encontrados na página de perfil. Para visualizar suas Distribuições de Classificação por ano e gênero, consulte nossa nova Guia de ajuda.
Selos5
Para saber como ganhar selos, acesse página de ajuda de selos.
Avaliações27
Classificação de The Overdrama
This movie is a repeat of the "Lost in Translation" phenomenon - a movie that picked up unmerited critical acclaim (although this movie was much better than "Translation"). While it was an okay film, and Paul Giamatti was good (as was Virginia Madsen), it is not excellent nor is it even a comedy.
Stuck in Boston during the blizzard, I ordered "Sideways" from OnCommand on my hotel's TV (a week before it opened wide in theaters - go fig). I wanted a comedy as it is labeled (and was categorized on the TV) so I watched it. It had no more humor than "Lord of the Rings" or "Star Wars" did. It should have been labeled as a 'romance' although that isn't even the most appropriate category.
As for Thomas Hayden Church, his role was nothing noteworthy in and of itself let alone his performance. He served better as Lowell on the hit show "Wings" than he did in "Sideways" as a sex-obsessed pig. Perhaps certain people liked seeing his bare butt
All in all, I recommend this movie only in three ways: 1] you are a wine connoisseur who doesn't mind your favorite subject being overshadowed by casual sex; or 2] you are not in the mood for a comedy; and/or 3] you do not have the choice of seeing a better movie.
Stuck in Boston during the blizzard, I ordered "Sideways" from OnCommand on my hotel's TV (a week before it opened wide in theaters - go fig). I wanted a comedy as it is labeled (and was categorized on the TV) so I watched it. It had no more humor than "Lord of the Rings" or "Star Wars" did. It should have been labeled as a 'romance' although that isn't even the most appropriate category.
As for Thomas Hayden Church, his role was nothing noteworthy in and of itself let alone his performance. He served better as Lowell on the hit show "Wings" than he did in "Sideways" as a sex-obsessed pig. Perhaps certain people liked seeing his bare butt
All in all, I recommend this movie only in three ways: 1] you are a wine connoisseur who doesn't mind your favorite subject being overshadowed by casual sex; or 2] you are not in the mood for a comedy; and/or 3] you do not have the choice of seeing a better movie.
