AngelVox
Entrou em set. de 1999
Bem-vindo(a) ao novo perfil
Nossas atualizações ainda estão em desenvolvimento. Embora a versão anterior do perfil não esteja mais acessível, estamos trabalhando ativamente em melhorias, e alguns dos recursos ausentes retornarão em breve! Fique atento ao retorno deles. Enquanto isso, Análise de Classificação ainda está disponível em nossos aplicativos iOS e Android, encontrados na página de perfil. Para visualizar suas Distribuições de Classificação por ano e gênero, consulte nossa nova Guia de ajuda.
Selos3
Para saber como ganhar selos, acesse página de ajuda de selos.
Avaliações6
Classificação de AngelVox
I thought "Proof of Life" had the potential to be a lot better than it was. It wasn't a terrible movie; it was good for filling two hours on my flight from Paris to Philadelphia. But it could have done some things a bit differently.
First off, for all the hype surrounding Russell Crowe and Meg Ryan during the shooting of this movie, I saw extremely little chemistry between them. Russell Crowe was much better than Meg Ryan; I could believe his character's emotions, while she just overacted in her role. I think it is also the fault of the plot; it did not really develop the romance story line. All we got were some long glances from Crowe in Ryan's direction. When they kissed near the end, I thought, Where is that coming from?
Second, what was the whole deal with the sister-in-law? Did she really need to be there? I thought that the whole family-coming-together-in-a-crisis thing was a bit old and out of place.
However, I thought it gave a very realistic portrayal of what it must be like to be a hostage. Because the plot followed the husband through his captivity, I really wanted him to survive; he wasn't just a little plot device to get Crowe and Ryan together. It was also pretty suspenseful, because I wasn't really sure if he would get out or not.
On the whole, I thought the action plot was very well developed, but lose the sister-in-law, and show us a little more romance!
First off, for all the hype surrounding Russell Crowe and Meg Ryan during the shooting of this movie, I saw extremely little chemistry between them. Russell Crowe was much better than Meg Ryan; I could believe his character's emotions, while she just overacted in her role. I think it is also the fault of the plot; it did not really develop the romance story line. All we got were some long glances from Crowe in Ryan's direction. When they kissed near the end, I thought, Where is that coming from?
Second, what was the whole deal with the sister-in-law? Did she really need to be there? I thought that the whole family-coming-together-in-a-crisis thing was a bit old and out of place.
However, I thought it gave a very realistic portrayal of what it must be like to be a hostage. Because the plot followed the husband through his captivity, I really wanted him to survive; he wasn't just a little plot device to get Crowe and Ryan together. It was also pretty suspenseful, because I wasn't really sure if he would get out or not.
On the whole, I thought the action plot was very well developed, but lose the sister-in-law, and show us a little more romance!
I did not want this movie to end. "American Beauty" may not be entirely realistic, but it had stayed with me in a very real way. Kevin Spacey floored me. I think that his job as Lester Burnham is the best acting I have ever seen, not just because his character was so cool, but because I cannot imagine anyone else in that role. And its moral made me think about how I live my life. Lester asks his wife in the movie, "When did you become so joyless?" I realized that that's the thing in life I never want to be. Lusting after a teenage girl and smoking weed are not my way of being joyful, but that's not really what the movie is about; it's about finding beauty in your life and enjoying it for what it is. And I can't think of a better way to live life.