Amor, Sublime Amor

I absolutely loved the movie - I had a lot of high expectations. I grew up rewatching the borrowed DVD of the 1961 version from the library. I have the 2009 Broadway version memorized by heart. But this adaptation?? It did everything so, so much justice. The acting, the singing, the dancing. There was a tension that you should feel throughout. And so many Performances with a capital P - ESP Ariana, Mike and David. The shots were absolutely BEAUTIFUL. The orchestra - EXQUISITE. This version of WSS actually broke me.

I want to watch it again. I look forward to owning this version on DVD.

My first thought in hearing about this ... a thought I'm sure was shared by many ... was WHY? Why remake a movie that was done so well the first time. Still, I went to the theater and found a wonderful, well-made movie. I hadn't read anything about the movie before seeing it and I went in wondering if they would update it to present day. They didn't, but I think that might have worked too.

Discussing the movie with my twenty-something son, I brought up the "why remake a nearly perfect film" question and his response was ... for a new generation. People his age were never going to see the 1961 version in the theater and most would never see a 60 year old movie at all. This movie allows a new generation (or two or three) to experience the magic on the big screen. Ultimately, the appeal of the movie lies in the music and the dance ... even more than the story. But the story is still powerful even after there have been so very many Romeo and Juliet adaptations.

A fun movie to see on the big screen.

It's not a remake. This has absolutely nothing to do with the 1961 film. They are completely separate adaptations of the stage musical. This is not rocket science. New versions of West Side Story are made every year around the world. The 1961 film has literally zero ownership over this story and characters.

It's as simple as this.. anyone crying about this film being "woke" - has not seen it. The extremely short passages of Spanish dialogue are deliberately written to not need subtitles. The performances make the context of the speech obvious - and everything is repeated in English anyway. Anybodys is presented exactly the same as the 1961 film - no reference to "non-binary" is ever made. Ergo the people moaning about the casting have (again) not even seen the film. Nothing about the main plot is changed, but the backstory is developed with great success. Chino especially is a huge improvement from earlier adaptions. Tony's more genuine past is a big asset to the film as well. Rita Moreno's new role is wonderful.

It's an incredible ensemble performance. The dancing is amazing, and the singing is breath-taking. And there's no miming here - many of the songs were even recorded live on set! The work behind the camera is equally impressive. Stunning cinematography and direction. Tony & Maria didn't have perfect chemistry, but the rest of the performance more than makes up for that.

Why are people acting invested in how much money this film makes, as if that has anything to do with it's quality. For a reality check I will remind you Steven Spielberg is literally the richest film director is the history of cinema. The guy is a multi-billionaire. Some people make a success of their lives while internet trolls waste away. Make better choices. And I realise I'm shouting into the void here - this page has clearly been completely lost to those trolls. Or should just say "troll" - on the first page alone I count 6 users that are all literally the same person. That's the extent of my patience, but no doubt this bizarre person has dozens more fake accounts if I could be bothered to check. Why someone would waste their life trolling a film website 24/7 is beyond me - but whatever, it's a free country.

Steven Spielberg remade the 10-time winner of the 1961 Academy Award and the musical known as "West Side Story." The film was definitely a remake, as it represents the conditions that were created in the 1960s, especially the social conditions and behavioral problems that existed in that decade. People waiting for a modern update will be really disappointed.

I must say right away that this is definitely my favorite piece of musical cinema. Based on Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet".

I really liked it, I advise everyone to watch it!!!

I can't answer that question because I haven't seen most of the remakes, but it is hard for me to imagine a better one. This film is not a copy of the original made in 1961, when the setting was contemporary with the film. That 1961 film won 10 Oscars including best picture and best director (Robert Wise), so it would be hard to top. Here Steven Spielberg doesn't top the original, but replaces it with something that brings the story up to date. It is edgier, filled with actors who are of the same ethnicity as the roles they play and ie speaks to current issues, notably immigration. The latter is not hard since the opposing gangs are white on one side and Puerto Rican on the other. It even has a role sympathetic to the current LGBTQ movement.

The original was my favorite filmed musical, largely for two reasons: The music and Natalie Wood in the role of Maria. The plot is, of course, a refashioning of Romeo and Juliet and the broad outlines of the 2021 film are the same. Some of the musical are not in the same places as in the 1961 film, which is okay except for "I Feel Pretty" which does not seem to come at an appropriate place. Also, "Somewhere" is not sung by the couple, but by Valentina (played by Rita Morena as an excellent replacement for Ned Glass as Doc). That did not work for me. Those made me gave this a 9 instead of a 10.

The script differs from the 1961 substantially and for the better, because it fills in some gaps in the plot and provides a better context for some of the music and actions. A few of the lyrics are changed as well, but not dramatically. Some of the dialog is in Spanish, but I could tell what was being said, again from the context.

I was never good at judging actors because it is always hard to tell how much of their performance owes to good direction and what can I say except Spielberg. To me, however, the performances seemed more realistic than the 1961 film.