AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,2/10
591
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Uma nova visão do caso Scott Peterson e dos assassinatos de sua esposa Laci Peterson e de seu filho Conner, que ainda não havia nascido.Uma nova visão do caso Scott Peterson e dos assassinatos de sua esposa Laci Peterson e de seu filho Conner, que ainda não havia nascido.Uma nova visão do caso Scott Peterson e dos assassinatos de sua esposa Laci Peterson e de seu filho Conner, que ainda não havia nascido.
- Artista
Explorar episódios
Avaliações em destaque
Waste of time, they obviously made this documentary on the heels of Lacy's documentary on Netflix. Scott is seen smiling throughout the series smiling and very nonchalant which rubbed me the wrong way. Also, when asked who killed Lacy, he blames the two men for that one burglary that happened across the street, how convenient to blame others when reasonable doubt clearly points at Scott Peterson. Then they have a so-called journalist who thinks he's a detective and says that Scott didn't have a motive ... um hello, they forget about Amber Frei?! This so-called documentary was biased toward Scott. Then they try and say that Lacy was abducted in a van that was found burned, even though there was zero evidence of Lacy's DNA. The reach is real with one. I wish I could take back the hours I spent watching this mess. Lastly, may Scott continue to rot in prison. R.i.p Lacy and Connor.
Scott Peterson was is guilty, no question. He like thousands of husbands and boyfriends with "missing" partners just not that concerned. Oh yeah she is gone, I'll eat pizza, not look for her, not try her cell phone, lie about cheating, lie about going golfing.. He like so many of these scumbags need to go to prison and stay there. Believe the dogs over a sociopath. If it were me.... And if one of my daughters was missing.. I would be door to door.., and if the bf or husband didn't put all effort in the search, water boarding would be the least of his problems. Can't believe Peacock would give this coward any time.
You would think after getting a 3.7 star rating on their previous Casey Anthony docuseries that they would stop glorifying killers. Clearly not.
Yet another bias Peacock docuseries that disrespects victims. This doc is basically a retelling of the 2017 A&E doc. Once again it's Scott's sister in law running the show, misleading viewers, and bold faced lies. She and the rest of his family are out of touch with reality. Lookup an online list of every piece of evidence against him and you'll see the massive list of "coincidences", which the family believes is just pure bad luck and poor ol' Scott is innocent.
Skip this watch the new very well made Netflix one, "American Murder: Laci Peterson." This one is based in reality (which is likely why Scott refused to partake in it, instead going along with this unbelievable story, which is a slap in the face for Laci, Conner, and her family. Peacock did the same thing for Casey Anthony, and seems that that their 3.7/10 rating for that one would make them stop, they did it again. Horrible.
Yet another bias Peacock docuseries that disrespects victims. This doc is basically a retelling of the 2017 A&E doc. Once again it's Scott's sister in law running the show, misleading viewers, and bold faced lies. She and the rest of his family are out of touch with reality. Lookup an online list of every piece of evidence against him and you'll see the massive list of "coincidences", which the family believes is just pure bad luck and poor ol' Scott is innocent.
Skip this watch the new very well made Netflix one, "American Murder: Laci Peterson." This one is based in reality (which is likely why Scott refused to partake in it, instead going along with this unbelievable story, which is a slap in the face for Laci, Conner, and her family. Peacock did the same thing for Casey Anthony, and seems that that their 3.7/10 rating for that one would make them stop, they did it again. Horrible.
This documentary aims to shed light on Scott Petersons potential innocence, instead it magnifies his misconduct and suspiciousness. I think about 80% of the way through the editing process the producers realise their mistake, proceeding to then throw in a ton of heavily circumstantial exculpatory evidence to try rectify their mistake and drive their point, only just missing a well executed alternative perspective, pun intended.
If this was instead a documentary to prove Scott Petersons guilt, this would be more deserving of a higher rating with respect to the attention to detail.
Couldn't help but laugh the whole way through.
If this was instead a documentary to prove Scott Petersons guilt, this would be more deserving of a higher rating with respect to the attention to detail.
Couldn't help but laugh the whole way through.
Not very compelling. Scott Peterson still should not speak in his own defense. He comes off as not genuine and dismissive. Honestly all of the circumstantial evidence presented in the trial and other documentaries is very convincing. The people in this documentary also provide holes and other possible circumstantial evidence that would support Scott's innocence but it is not very strong. The timing of Scott telling (lying) Amber Frey that his wife was dead, his purchase of a boat (that no one knew of), his examination of tide tables, where he said he went "fishing" and where the bodies were found is beyond coincidental. His behavior particularly his continued communication with Amber Frey while the search was still going for his wife is suspicious.
Você sabia?
- ConexõesFeatured in Murder Has Two Faces: Motherhood Interrupted (2025)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- Tempo de duração
- 2 h 53 min(173 min)
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente