Maio de 1984. Um caminhoneiro de sorvetes entra no concurso Press Your Luck com um segredo: a chave para ganhar dinheiro sem fim. Mas sua série de vitórias é ameaçada quando os executivos de... Ler tudoMaio de 1984. Um caminhoneiro de sorvetes entra no concurso Press Your Luck com um segredo: a chave para ganhar dinheiro sem fim. Mas sua série de vitórias é ameaçada quando os executivos descobrem suas verdadeiras motivações.Maio de 1984. Um caminhoneiro de sorvetes entra no concurso Press Your Luck com um segredo: a chave para ganhar dinheiro sem fim. Mas sua série de vitórias é ameaçada quando os executivos descobrem suas verdadeiras motivações.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
Avaliações em destaque
Luckiest Man in America is a textbook case of wasted potential. You've got a talented cast firing on all cylinders-delivering nuanced, emotionally sharp performances that deserved way better material. But the story? It drags like a flat tire on a cross-country road trip.
The pacing is glacial, the plot feels like it's searching for meaning in all the wrong places, and by the halfway mark, you're not wondering what happens next-you're wondering how much longer you have to sit through it. It's less "luckiest man in America" and more "audience stuck in narrative limbo."
To be fair, the performances alone kept this from dropping into total disaster territory. But great acting can only do so much when the story they're trapped in is meandering, repetitive, and about as gripping as a lukewarm cup of decaf.
Verdict: Strong cast, weak script. If you're watching for the actors, sure-just don't expect them to save the movie from itself.
The pacing is glacial, the plot feels like it's searching for meaning in all the wrong places, and by the halfway mark, you're not wondering what happens next-you're wondering how much longer you have to sit through it. It's less "luckiest man in America" and more "audience stuck in narrative limbo."
To be fair, the performances alone kept this from dropping into total disaster territory. But great acting can only do so much when the story they're trapped in is meandering, repetitive, and about as gripping as a lukewarm cup of decaf.
Verdict: Strong cast, weak script. If you're watching for the actors, sure-just don't expect them to save the movie from itself.
"The Luckiest Man In America" is the true 1984 tale of Michael Larson (Paul Walter Hauser - strong again) who blagged his way onto the tv game-show 'Press Your Luck' (hosted by Walton Goggins) to rack up monster winnings - and make the show's staff (inc David Strathairn, Maisie Williams, & Shamier Anderson) suspect that something was amiss. It's fascinating fare, well made (by second-time director Samir Oliveros who co-wrote this his first screenplay with second-time writer Maggie Briggs) with the likes of Johnny Knoxville & Haley Bennett in minor support - tho it'll leave most asking Google to complete Larson's story for them. It's a good movie... just a little thin.
I remember this happening and here it is, in a movie. They did a great job re-telling this story with an amazing cast to boot.
Hauser delivers another great performance of the main character in a true story. Although Black Bird was a much better production, this still nails it all in a movie length feature.
Always good to see Goggins in anything and he plays the host here to a tee.
Very interesting behind the scenes storyline as well, something that nobody really knew about unless they were actually there. Obviously not everything is exactly what happened but I think they did a great job here.
Dragged a bit near the end but still only and hour and a half. Good movie for the morning.
Peese.
Hauser delivers another great performance of the main character in a true story. Although Black Bird was a much better production, this still nails it all in a movie length feature.
Always good to see Goggins in anything and he plays the host here to a tee.
Very interesting behind the scenes storyline as well, something that nobody really knew about unless they were actually there. Obviously not everything is exactly what happened but I think they did a great job here.
Dragged a bit near the end but still only and hour and a half. Good movie for the morning.
Peese.
The list of things that didn't happen is way longer than the list of things that actually happened, and the stuff that actually happened is far more interesting.
Yes, Michael did go on the show and win big by memorizing the patterns on the board. But that's where the true part ends. Everything else that happened, him wandering on to another talk show, breaking into his truck and watching tapes, calling his wife and putting her on the show, the list goes on.
The movie is well cast, but not well written. If you want to watch a more interesting telling of the story, go watch "Big Bucks: The Press Your Luck Scandal"
Yes, Michael did go on the show and win big by memorizing the patterns on the board. But that's where the true part ends. Everything else that happened, him wandering on to another talk show, breaking into his truck and watching tapes, calling his wife and putting her on the show, the list goes on.
The movie is well cast, but not well written. If you want to watch a more interesting telling of the story, go watch "Big Bucks: The Press Your Luck Scandal"
Saw this at a TIFF screening last night, theatre completely sold out. The film itself is a pretty nice 90-minute film mostly sitting on one set. While the film does have a really strong premise, it most definetly loses its steam in the latter acts due to its lack of understanding of where to go. I really adored Paul Walter Hauser in this, but his character felt severly underwritten- it sorta seemed like he was many things for a long time and yet, he just turned out to be a normal pretty intelligent man. They kept alluding to something big was going to happen at the end with a twist, but it never comes, leaving an odd sour taste in my mouth as the credits rolled. But its still a very enjoyable casual wednesday night watch.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesWhile in the film David Strathairn plays a CBS TV producer. he previously played another CBS figure, journalist Edward R. Murrow in Boa Noite e Boa Sorte (2005).
- Erros de gravaçãoVHS tapes founded after breaking in ice cream van are marked "E-180". They are PAL/SECAM cassettes. in USA NTSC-system cassettes were marked "T", i.e. T-120 for example.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosWrap-up footage from the actual broadcast follows the director and producers credits followed by the crawling movie credits.
- ConexõesReferences 60 Minutos (1968)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Centrais de atendimento oficiais
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Найщасливіший чоловік Америки
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 433.617
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 284.744
- 6 de abr. de 2025
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 433.617
- Tempo de duração1 hora 31 minutos
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
What is the French language plot outline for The Luckiest Man in America (2024)?
Responda