Man with No Past

I really don't understand why some reviewers are emptying carts of dung on this movie.

It's not great, but it's not bad.

The movie is average. Average shooting. Average direction. Average acting. But a rather efficient script.

There is little action for an action movie, but the clever part is that the storyline builds up to the action sequences, so that they are quite satisfying when they do occur.

Director James Bamford's filmography is a good indicator of what to expect, minor thrillers, like Jade, Hard home or shadow zone, and efficient episodes of NCIS, batwoman, superman & lois, or Arrow. Actually this is what you should expect, a good feature length episode of Arrow.

The movie is an action movie but the storyline is quite a bit convoluted, dealing with the idea of repetition of lives and cosmic forces.

The quality of the movie overall is decent, nothing is amazing but nothing is bad either. Few of the actors are quite good, obviously Jon Voight and also Marton Csokas who needs to get more villain roles, he is great in them.

Action scenes are not bad but seem like the type of scenes that I've seen before elsewhere, with the camera near the action moving about and with the action changing from normal speed to slow motion to normal speed. It looks more of a comic book movie type action. It is done competently.

The violence isn't too graphic and there is a modest sex scene where nothing much is revealed.

It just seemed like the story dragged so much.

Scenes would just linger and Adam Woodward doesn't seem to have the charisma to carry the acting load. Jon Voight despite his age provided a much needed spark.

It just seemed like the story dragged so much.

Scenes would just linger and Adam Woodward doesn't seem to have the charisma to carry the acting load. Jon Voight despite his age provided a much needed spark.

It just seemed like the story dragged so much.

Scenes would just linger and Adam Woodward doesn't seem to have the charisma to carry the acting load. Jon Voight despite his age provided a much needed spark.

Is boring. It's boring because it is as chaotic as flash cards are at a 5th grade foreign language class. Indeed, it appears the director was just as bored; doing one disjointed scene after another just to get through his contract.

I pity the actors who signed on and then had to suffer the direction.

To that add the storyline is a pretty well used theme ( flip-flopping to and fro in a timeline.) The difference here is it flips and flops so frequently you forget where the base point is?

Character development has little "time," in the flip-flops to develop. And so, the viewer is left with their own devices to sort things out; which might be fun in a well written novel. But in a film that typically last less than 200 minutes a lot of artistry has to happen. It did not happen here. Instead it's a hod podge of unbelievable scenes knitted together and presented as "A Film." It is just that. But not a very good film.

If you need background noise while cleaning or sleeping, this is a perfect choice. This was the worst chaotic movie i ever watch. It seemed very low budget and didn't make sense at all. It wasnt engaged. You couldn't pay me to watch this again. Everyone wear the same clothes. Maybe 2 pairs of clothing each actor. I fell a sleep 5 times. Nothing was explained. I wish I didn't pay for it. I cant even write a short summary of what I watch. I need my money and the time I spend watching it. The actors did their best,the flash backs didn't make any sense. I really rate the movie 0 out of 10 if I could.