Towards Zero
- Minissérie de televisão
- 2025
O Superintendente Battle e o Inspetor Leach investigam o assassinato de uma viúva em Gull's Point. Um suicídio fracassado, uma falsa acusação de roubo e a vida amorosa de uma estrela do têni... Ler tudoO Superintendente Battle e o Inspetor Leach investigam o assassinato de uma viúva em Gull's Point. Um suicídio fracassado, uma falsa acusação de roubo e a vida amorosa de uma estrela do tênis surpreendentemente se conectam.O Superintendente Battle e o Inspetor Leach investigam o assassinato de uma viúva em Gull's Point. Um suicídio fracassado, uma falsa acusação de roubo e a vida amorosa de uma estrela do tênis surpreendentemente se conectam.
Explorar episódios
Resumo
Reviewers say 'Towards Zero' is criticized for its slow pace, unnecessary plot changes, and lack of suspense. Disappointment arises from deviations from Agatha Christie's novel, which detract from the story. Performances are uneven, often lacking tension and menace. The overly dark visual style is frequently faulted for hindering immersion and clarity. Despite these issues, some appreciate the visual aesthetics and certain performances, though these positives are overshadowed by the overall negative reception.
Avaliações em destaque
Enjoyable tosh I'd say. Love seeing the mega-rich come unstuck. Love Agatha Christie too so this was a must-see. Looks great, lovely photography.
Reviewer kristhebass mentions the Black barrister played by the excellent Clarke Peters, as if this was an anachronism. This reviewer may be interested to know (but probably won't want to know) that the first Black barrister to practice in the UK was in 1884. No, Agatha Christie probably didn't mention any character's ethnic background so basically anyone could be cast. It's not as if it's 'unhistorical' in this instance. Oh and I think the 'maid' is more of a lady's companion, as she quite clearly states in the first episode.
Reviewer kristhebass mentions the Black barrister played by the excellent Clarke Peters, as if this was an anachronism. This reviewer may be interested to know (but probably won't want to know) that the first Black barrister to practice in the UK was in 1884. No, Agatha Christie probably didn't mention any character's ethnic background so basically anyone could be cast. It's not as if it's 'unhistorical' in this instance. Oh and I think the 'maid' is more of a lady's companion, as she quite clearly states in the first episode.
I'll never understand why the main character of the book gets cut out of the televised version every time. Also, why is everything so dark? It's like it was filmed in the middle of the night with a filter.
It's a good try, but Kay is not the 23 year old redhead party girl from the book, and several other characters don't ring true either. I'm just hoping that they haven't changed the murderer too.
Although, I could see the story being updated to the modern day with Kay as a social media obsessed influencer and Audrey as an ex-supermodel.
I'm giving it 5 stars for effort, even though it misses for changing the story unnecessarily.
It's a good try, but Kay is not the 23 year old redhead party girl from the book, and several other characters don't ring true either. I'm just hoping that they haven't changed the murderer too.
Although, I could see the story being updated to the modern day with Kay as a social media obsessed influencer and Audrey as an ex-supermodel.
I'm giving it 5 stars for effort, even though it misses for changing the story unnecessarily.
The visual aesthetic of the series is a major letdown. The overly dark and blueish tint gives it a dated, early-2010s look that feels more like a tired crime drama than a timeless Agatha Christie mystery. The muted color palette and lack of visual creativity make the entire production feel bland and uninspired.
The pacing is another significant issue. The combination of an overtly slow and melodramatic score and hollow conversations drag the story unnecessarily. The result is a miniseries that feels much longer than it actually is.
Finally, the characters, while seemingly layered, quickly become tiresome. Each one is burdened with a troubled past or some nuanced background, but these elements feel overused and repetitive, and lacking authenticity. Instead of adding depth, the constant focus on their personal struggles makes the characters feel like clichés. By the time the mystery reaches its conclusion, it's hard to care about who did what or why.
For me this miniseries is a waste of three hours that I want back.
The pacing is another significant issue. The combination of an overtly slow and melodramatic score and hollow conversations drag the story unnecessarily. The result is a miniseries that feels much longer than it actually is.
Finally, the characters, while seemingly layered, quickly become tiresome. Each one is burdened with a troubled past or some nuanced background, but these elements feel overused and repetitive, and lacking authenticity. Instead of adding depth, the constant focus on their personal struggles makes the characters feel like clichés. By the time the mystery reaches its conclusion, it's hard to care about who did what or why.
For me this miniseries is a waste of three hours that I want back.
The good thing about this was it was just 3 episodes long and, being bbc who don't spend big bucks on the same old actors allowed me to watch the show rather than thinking "What have I seen them in before?"
For me the story was too slow at times with a lot of filler (an hour is an hour on bbc unlike other channels that only need 45 minutes) but it was still engaging.
Waiting a long time for the first murder wasn't helpful but that was the whole point of the story we are told.
I was losing interest until Audrey and Neville became intimate on the stairwell in episode 2.
A strange ending it has to be said after twists, turns and double buffs.
I can see why this hasn't been given the same publicity as on social media that other re went dramas have received.
Watchable but you won't miss anything if you don't.
The ABC Murders was much better.
Waiting a long time for the first murder wasn't helpful but that was the whole point of the story we are told.
I was losing interest until Audrey and Neville became intimate on the stairwell in episode 2.
A strange ending it has to be said after twists, turns and double buffs.
I can see why this hasn't been given the same publicity as on social media that other re went dramas have received.
Watchable but you won't miss anything if you don't.
The ABC Murders was much better.
The second instalment sees the situations at Gull's point escalate. After a danced through afternoon at the nearby pleasure hotel with multiple partner exchanges and another troublesome newcomer in the form of a former boyfriend, Lady Tressilian is most displeased with her house guests and threatens to change her will. The love triangle at the centre concludes in two people having intimate relations in the stairwell of the house in view of everyone else, a scene that I guess was supposed to be erotic, but ended up more awkward than enticing. Soon after we (finally) get our first murder. Inspector Leach, who has survived his suicide attempt and strikes up an unlikely friendship with Sylvia, investigates the death and soon finds that things might not be as easy as they seem at first glance.
It all continues to be very pretty and glamorous, but by now the changes from the book become glaringly obvious and not all are good ones. The addition of a couple characters are fine, but the original characters suffer a little. Audrey in particular appears little more than a pretty distraction here. It's unclear why Neville seems unable to stay away from her to the point that he betrays his wife right in front of her nose - or why Audrey seems to have her heart set on prying him away from Kay after insisting on the divorce. Both of their motives for this love triangle have been done away with, leaving the central relationships a little flat in result.
It all continues to be very pretty and glamorous, but by now the changes from the book become glaringly obvious and not all are good ones. The addition of a couple characters are fine, but the original characters suffer a little. Audrey in particular appears little more than a pretty distraction here. It's unclear why Neville seems unable to stay away from her to the point that he betrays his wife right in front of her nose - or why Audrey seems to have her heart set on prying him away from Kay after insisting on the divorce. Both of their motives for this love triangle have been done away with, leaving the central relationships a little flat in result.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesBurgh Island, South Devon is one of the filming locations. The island is associated with writer Agatha Christie, who often visited and used the location as inspiration for at least two novels: And Then There Were None (1939) and Evil Under the Sun (1941). Previous Christie stories filmed there include: Miss Marple: Nemesis (1987) and Evil Under the Sun (2001).
- Erros de gravaçãoMatthew Rhys' detective is shown smoking filter cigarettes which did not become commonplace until the late 1950s, but this is set in the 1930s.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Година нуль
- Locações de filme
- Burgh Island, Bigbury-on-Sea, Devon, Inglaterra, Reino Unido(Exterior of Easterhead Bay Hotel; pool area as hotel in Nice.)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was Towards Zero (2025) officially released in Canada in French?
Responda