Ativistas criminosos sequestram uma festa de gala e fazem 300 reféns. Um extremista está planejando um assassinato em massa como uma mensagem para o mundo. Ridley, um ex-soldado que virou li... Ler tudoAtivistas criminosos sequestram uma festa de gala e fazem 300 reféns. Um extremista está planejando um assassinato em massa como uma mensagem para o mundo. Ridley, um ex-soldado que virou limpador de janelas, tenta resgatar os reféns.Ativistas criminosos sequestram uma festa de gala e fazem 300 reféns. Um extremista está planejando um assassinato em massa como uma mensagem para o mundo. Ridley, um ex-soldado que virou limpador de janelas, tenta resgatar os reféns.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
Taz Skylar
- Noah
- (as Taz Skyler)
- …
Sol E. Romero
- Halina
- (as Sol E Romero)
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
The answer is this film. Make the two stars do the bare minimum so you don't have to pay them too much? I don't really get it tho. Like all the money went to the production and Campbell? Clive Owen essentially pulls a Bruce Willis here. Total screen time probably didn't exceed 5 minutes and you got Daisy Ridley outside of the building for 3/4 of the film, doing nothing when she should've just did something to begin with and save us all the stupid ass runtime. This movie would be over in 40 minutes. I'm rambling along here cuz there's a minimum characters required to post a review apparently. I don't write reviews that often...
Okay, is this movie winning Oscars? No. Was it a fun watch? Well, yes. Yes it was. Daisy Ridley was solid in her role. I wish we had more Clive Owen. I think the movie would have been better if he played the role of Noah Santos. But overall, it was a fun action movie if you go in to it without high expectations which is what I did. They did give this movie a budget of $25 million which is quite impressive for a movie that wasn't a theater release. My only complaint, cheesy writing and situations that defied logic. But overall I had fun watching it. It kept my attention for almost two hours. If you're bored and can't find anything to watch, give this a go. Heck, it's better than most offerings on Netflix lol.
I'm joking, of course. Looks a lot like someone was channeling Die Hard when they wrote the script. Every time I thought they weren't going to take from that movie, they found another homage...
Ridley is not bad as an action star. I'd watch another movie with her in it. Clive Own, who wasn't in the movie enough to warrant third billing, was fine. Matthew Tuck, on the other hand, was unbelievable as the autistic brother. I think that distracted me a lot.
It had a predictable ending, one I will not divulge here. All in all, not particularly good. All in all, not particularly bad...
See this one after you've seen every other movie, just for closure...
Ridley is not bad as an action star. I'd watch another movie with her in it. Clive Own, who wasn't in the movie enough to warrant third billing, was fine. Matthew Tuck, on the other hand, was unbelievable as the autistic brother. I think that distracted me a lot.
It had a predictable ending, one I will not divulge here. All in all, not particularly good. All in all, not particularly bad...
See this one after you've seen every other movie, just for closure...
Corporate greed, eco-activism, terrorism, and a window-cleaner ex-military girl taking down the bad guys who seized her building.
I'll be brief.
This movie is neither particularly fun nor satisfying. The premise shows promise but reveals its hand too early and quickly loses steam. The action is serviceable, the villains are a yawn, and the characters, their motivations, dialogue, and their resolution are all too generic to leave a lasting impression. On top of that, the pacing drags in places, the ending fails to deliver, and the emotional beats between the siblings never quite land. Does it attempt to make a statement about environmental destruction and corporate accountability? If so, it does so in the dullest way possible.
Die Hard, this is not, so the comparisons are moot. Here, the villains hold all the cards (they control the police, the building, and the hostages) and yet the heroine somehow becomes an inexplicable problem for them. There's a script issue, but also an execution problem, as Miss Ridley is competent in the role, but her casual attitude while committing "action" feels jarring and undermines any sense of real danger.
At least it is short (90 minutes, and it feels even shorter). Watch if you want a generic action movie.
I'll be brief.
This movie is neither particularly fun nor satisfying. The premise shows promise but reveals its hand too early and quickly loses steam. The action is serviceable, the villains are a yawn, and the characters, their motivations, dialogue, and their resolution are all too generic to leave a lasting impression. On top of that, the pacing drags in places, the ending fails to deliver, and the emotional beats between the siblings never quite land. Does it attempt to make a statement about environmental destruction and corporate accountability? If so, it does so in the dullest way possible.
Die Hard, this is not, so the comparisons are moot. Here, the villains hold all the cards (they control the police, the building, and the hostages) and yet the heroine somehow becomes an inexplicable problem for them. There's a script issue, but also an execution problem, as Miss Ridley is competent in the role, but her casual attitude while committing "action" feels jarring and undermines any sense of real danger.
At least it is short (90 minutes, and it feels even shorter). Watch if you want a generic action movie.
I like Daisy Ridley a lot, and I think she does her best to carry the film, but I just found myself rolling my eyes far too often to enjoy this mess.
I can only suspend disbelief to a certain point, and above every other problem is this... How does everything in the first half of the film happen EXACTLY where the one window cleaner happens to be. This is a four-sided skyscraper!!! Also, people have regular conversations through the glass, one canister of gas in a hallway is enough to knock out everyone on every floor, people travel multiple floors in no time at all, SOOOO many clichès, etc. And as much as I rooted for Daisy to win, it's hard to feel sorry for the hostages.
There was some fun action, though nothing outstanding, and it was capably directed in a way that was very easy to follow. Also, I really enjoyed Matthew Tuck as her brother. Could've been a very annoying character, but he grounded it enough for me.
I can only suspend disbelief to a certain point, and above every other problem is this... How does everything in the first half of the film happen EXACTLY where the one window cleaner happens to be. This is a four-sided skyscraper!!! Also, people have regular conversations through the glass, one canister of gas in a hallway is enough to knock out everyone on every floor, people travel multiple floors in no time at all, SOOOO many clichès, etc. And as much as I rooted for Daisy to win, it's hard to feel sorry for the hostages.
There was some fun action, though nothing outstanding, and it was capably directed in a way that was very easy to follow. Also, I really enjoyed Matthew Tuck as her brother. Could've been a very annoying character, but he grounded it enough for me.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThis is the second time Daisy Ridley and Clive Owen have played a protagonist and antagonist in the same movie. Their first movie was Ofélia (2018).
- Erros de gravaçãoWhen the Joey is outside she has a conversation with someone of the inside of the building - they can hear each other easily as no one has to raise their voice. Glass like this in towers is very thick and tough and would deaden noises. A proof of how tough the glass is that later on she tries to break the glass with a heavy wrench without success..
- ConexõesReferenced in Film Threat: CLEANER | Film Threat Reviews (2025)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Cleaner?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Клінер
- Locações de filme
- Winnersh Film Studios, RU(1020 Eskdale Road Wokingham RG41 5TS)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- £ 25.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 794.091
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 403.560
- 23 de fev. de 2025
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 1.314.073
- Tempo de duração1 hora 37 minutos
- Cor
- Proporção
- 2.39 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente