Siksa Kubur

Joko Anwar has been known to make films with notable standards like great characters, interesting premise to follow, provoking dialogues, and doses of gore here and there. Grave Torture checks all of the items, but unfortunately, it also checks Anwar's notorious trademark: a weak third act.

Anwar has always been a good storyteller. This movie is no exception. It has a bubbling mystery in every corner, asking me to guess in every scene, unrolled with witty, almost absurd, characters, to keep me on my seat along with amazing technical aspects, especially the sound design. Then, the third act comes.

It reminds me of all of his previous horror works where the plot becomes chaotic and blurred. I don't know how, but it felt really exploitative. There's not much of a story, just series of audience-engaging scenes masquerading as a climax. How is that justify all of the buildups? How is that going to answer all of the questions? Those questions keep me on my seat until suddenly, it ends.

I realized that Anwar is not responsible to make a film that I can fully understand. Maybe I am not smart enough for that. Maybe it's a trick to anticipates for possible sequel (if any). Or maybe, it's time for me to accept that Anwar's style will never going to a direction that I like. But, I think most of his climax is an easy way out for such lucrative plot development that he makes.

Then again, the climax stays in my head for two days. It does impactful.

Have you ever been in a group project where everyone had a good idea, but no one could agree on which one to use? That's exactly how this movie feels. While it does deliver some genuine scares (hence the bump to a 5), the overall direction is completely scattered. It feels like a college movie project gone off the rails.

This is not a 6/7-star horror movie like The Night House, A Dark Song, Session 9, Tigers Are Not Afraid, Huesera: The Bone Woman, or Lake Mungo (which I personally think deserve higher ratings, but are likely dragged down by non-horror fans). I suspect this film's rating may be inflated, possibly due to being more catered to a religious Indonesian audience.

It's worth a watch, but don't make it the main event for movie night. It's the kind of film you put on when you don't mind your friends talking during it. Or maybe the one you watch before diving into something really good.

Honestly, this movie would've worked better as an anthology. The number of different directions it tries to go in ends up being almost comedic at times.

For the duration's worth and the marketing materials, I was expecting Joko Anwar to expand the discussion triggers on various perceptions of what would happen the moment someone was buried six feet under. Unfortunately, he spent too much time on the jumpscare build-up in the second act to fully develop his promising main characters, which made the story... kinda go nowhere.

The first act is solid, Widuri Puteri and Faradina Mufti did an immense job of making the seamless transition from young Sita to adult Sita. Her and Adil's childhood struggle is a stellar backstory, which is a shame that the follow-up in the second act felt cheap to handle their inner conflictions. Would love to see more screen time of young Sita and Adil in the pesantren because it would've given more betrayal value to add to drive Sita's motivation and also satisfactory value for what eventually happened to the villain. Personally, I wasn't invested enough in the villain to see his ass totally whipped as a payoff. The horror elements in the second act are what tickled me the most because for being something that supposedly affected Sita's state of mind, all of the events were actually meaningless and contradictory. Why bother making bad things happen to the people who don't deserve it when the point is that you'll reap what you sow before entering the afterlife?

Another thing is Adil's character journey. I feel like he had so much potential, especially with the exceptional delivery by the incomparable Reza Rahadian, that went wasted because the film didn't want to address him explicitly. For being half of the main characters, I wish we got more of his story shown.

All in all, the cast ensemble carried this film on their backs. No bad performances whatsoever. The sound design also popped off. If only the story is much stronger.

Horror movies. Often a genre synonymous with jump scares, gore, and mindless entertainment. While these elements can be thrilling, they rarely delve into the deeper recesses of the human psyche. They seldom grapple with the existential questions that gnaw at us in the quiet hours, the ones that keep us up at night. This is precisely why Joko Anwar's Siksa Kubur a.k.a. Grave Torture, struck such a profound chord with me. It dared to be different, to transcend the genre's limitations and offer a horror experience unlike any other.

Unlike its conventional counterparts, Siksa Kubur didn't shy away from the very questions I myself grapple with. These weren't the usual horror tropes - ghosts seeking revenge or vengeful spirits. Instead, the film delved into the complexities of fear of the unknown, the nature of good and evil, motives and consequences. It forced me to confront these unsettling realities head-on, making me a willing participant in its exploration of the human mind.

But what truly elevated from Siksa Kubur was its ability to offer insightful answers to these harrowing questions. It didn't bombard me with simplistic solutions or preachy pronouncements. Instead, the film presented its ideas through a masterfully crafted narrative, allowing me to arrive at my own interpretations. The terror wasn't simply a means to an end; it served as a catalyst for introspection. The scares, while undeniably effective, weren't the sole focus. They were meticulously woven into the narrative, each one serving to push me further down the rabbit hole of self-discovery.

This is not to say that the film shied away from genuine scares. Siksa Kubur delivered moments of pure, unadulterated terror. However, these moments were not gratuitous. They were meticulously placed, serving to heighten the emotional stakes and reinforce the film's central themes. The true brilliance lay in the way these scares intertwined with the exploration of the aforementioned questions. Each jump or moment of heart-pounding suspense added another layer to the film's tapestry, deepening the overall impact.

The film's characters also played a pivotal role in its success. They weren't simply one-dimensional archetypes, instead, they were complex individuals wrestling with their own internal demons, mirroring the struggles of the audience. Their journeys became our journeys, their fears resonated with our own anxieties. We empathized with their plight, becoming emotionally invested in their fate, which made the film's exploration of these profound themes all the more impactful.

Ultimately, Siksa Kubur served as more than just a horror film. It was a thought-provoking experience that challenged me to confront my own fears and grapple with the existential questions that linger in the shadows. It offered no easy answers, but instead, empowered me to forge my own path of understanding. In a genre often content with cheap thrills, Siksa Kubur dared to be different, offering a horror experience that was both terrifying and intellectually stimulating. It reminded me that horror, at its best, can be a powerful tool for introspection, forcing us to confront the darkness within and emerge, perhaps, with a newfound sense of self-awareness.

Watching films is not just entertainment, but there is value that we bring home. Joko Anwar offers psychological horror, which is the time for film lovers to move up from just bland exotic horror. The cinematography and tone are perfect, the acting of all the actors is seasoned, even though some actors are debutants, the scoring is great, and the plot twist at the ending is typical Joko Anwar. The film is only 1 hour 57 minutes long, but it would take perhaps a week to discuss it.

Watching the Joko Anwar film is like reading an interactive children's novel by R. A. Montgomery. We are stimulated to think, every scene contains a clue. In fact, the ending of the film is also up to each viewer's interpretation. Joko Anwar never forces his will in any of his films.