AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,8/10
2,6 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Uma brilhante estudante de matemática na melhor universidade da França, a Ecole Normale Supérieure. No dia da apresentação de sua tese, um erro abala toda a certeza de sua vida planejada, el... Ler tudoUma brilhante estudante de matemática na melhor universidade da França, a Ecole Normale Supérieure. No dia da apresentação de sua tese, um erro abala toda a certeza de sua vida planejada, ela decide abandonar tudo e começar de novo.Uma brilhante estudante de matemática na melhor universidade da França, a Ecole Normale Supérieure. No dia da apresentação de sua tese, um erro abala toda a certeza de sua vida planejada, ela decide abandonar tudo e começar de novo.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 4 vitórias e 1 indicação no total
Xiaoxing Cheng
- M. Kong
- (as Maurice Cheng)
Karl Ruben Noel
- Le danseur
- (as Karl-Ruben 'Rubix' Noël)
Pakirathan Sulakshan
- Le mathématicien
- (as Sulax Pakirat)
Avaliações em destaque
I hate mathematics, I have always hated them, but I love this movie which doesn't need to be a good expert in maths to appreciate it. It is a true authentic character study about a young woman who is an expert in maths and whose world suddenly collapses when she realizes that all her theories don't match anymore. This is not a comedy, a stupid comedy which French film industry has the secret, but a true riveting story, that the French has also the secret of...Never boring and you always wonder what the following scene will be. Nothing predictable. What could we ask for? Not a masterpiece but what for after all?
10kosmasp
No pun intended - math was something I loved in school too. But when we got to higher math (that's not a pun, right?) I felt like I lost the thread. I really like how the movie presents itself though. It has so many elements (or variables to stay and stick with the theme of the movie) ... and they all work well together! Be it actors, the story, developments, relationships and so much more.
The good thing is that while the math presented is quite complicated (I assume they double checked and everything is legit in the movie, I can't say for certain though), it is more a byproduct ... so don't worry too much about it. I didn't get it either - but you don't have to. Because this is more about the woman and human finally being able to get a breakthrough .. .or more than one that is. That's why I thought I make this my review 11088 ... I mean I didn't plan the release of the movie in the cinemas ... but since it played right now and I was almost at the number, I was able to pin it down to that.
I did not paint that on a chalkboard (wall) ... while she is thickheaded (our main character), we will love her ... we will feel for and with her ... she is quite gullible, but also weird and stubborn ... and so many other things! Kudos to the actress who probably is nothing like that in real life. A beautiful ... also mind (actually I could have used that as a summary headline - always with my no pun intended trademark of course) ...
The good thing is that while the math presented is quite complicated (I assume they double checked and everything is legit in the movie, I can't say for certain though), it is more a byproduct ... so don't worry too much about it. I didn't get it either - but you don't have to. Because this is more about the woman and human finally being able to get a breakthrough .. .or more than one that is. That's why I thought I make this my review 11088 ... I mean I didn't plan the release of the movie in the cinemas ... but since it played right now and I was almost at the number, I was able to pin it down to that.
I did not paint that on a chalkboard (wall) ... while she is thickheaded (our main character), we will love her ... we will feel for and with her ... she is quite gullible, but also weird and stubborn ... and so many other things! Kudos to the actress who probably is nothing like that in real life. A beautiful ... also mind (actually I could have used that as a summary headline - always with my no pun intended trademark of course) ...
Despite familiar themes, the movie is well-made and avoids being overly dramatic. It is well worth watching and takes more after the movie 21 than 'Good Will Hunting' or 'A Beautiful Mind'. A very solid performance by Ella Rumpf (known from the movie "Raw") who portrays Marguerite. Starts a bit slow but if you bite the bullet and continue watching, you will be rewarded. Some plot twists are predictable (just like in the movie "21"), but others you will not see coming. The movie explores a common problem, talented young people who get discouraged when they realize success isn't guaranteed. Marguerite is a brilliant math student who crumbles when her big theorem turns out to be wrong. While the movie explores familiar territory (genius obsessed with proving themselves), it might not resonate with everyone unless you're really into number theory (a specific branch of mathematics). The film uses camera tricks to show how overwhelmed Marguerite feels and how she struggles to decide between her passion for math and the harsh realities of the world. I also loved the movie and the performances of Julien Frison (Lucas) and Sonia Bonny (Noa). But Ella Rumpf (Marguerite Hoffmann) takes the crown. Perfect casting for this role. Rated the movie 9/10 and well deserved. No need to say that this is a must see (despite the slow start).
It's a truth not quite universally acknowledged that films about hard intellectual or creative work, well, suck. I'm not sure if higher mathematics is particularly prone (all of Good Will Hunting except the Robin Williams bits; the -entirety- of A Beautiful Mind; everything but the facts of that Ramanujan film are at least as far removed as, say, Star Wars is and from astrophysics).
This, though, does not.
The central character is not a transcendent but flawed genius but hardworking and self-denying; the moments of inspiration (which are a real thing) look real and come through sheer effort, not effortless revelation with accompanying sound effects; and the scholarly politicking and casual STEM sexism are, well, true to life.
But - and this is probably burying the lede, sorry - it is also (1) splendid performances by all of the main cast; (2) a very thoughtful reflection on the connection between abstract thought and the human condition; and (3) an actually enjoyable film.
This, though, does not.
The central character is not a transcendent but flawed genius but hardworking and self-denying; the moments of inspiration (which are a real thing) look real and come through sheer effort, not effortless revelation with accompanying sound effects; and the scholarly politicking and casual STEM sexism are, well, true to life.
But - and this is probably burying the lede, sorry - it is also (1) splendid performances by all of the main cast; (2) a very thoughtful reflection on the connection between abstract thought and the human condition; and (3) an actually enjoyable film.
A movie about a semi-autistic young female mathematician struggling to fit into the society, with a happy end: she finds her boy and even succeeds in proving an uber-hard conjecture. In a sense, it's like Neo from The Matrix: started as an outcast but then saves the world and gets the girl (boy). The nerdy version of Cinderella plot.
As a movie, it's not that exciting. Simply because the math part would be impenetrable to the vast majority of the audience. So it's reduced to gibberish and meaningless math symbols on blackboards. Instead, the movie focuses on the social inadequacy: at the age of 25, the heroine is still dependent on her mom. She quits her math PhD after her first failure and tries to survive in the city by taking up random working-class jobs. When she's inevitably fired from those for disrespecting authority, she starts earning cash illegally from Mahjong gambling. In real life this would eventually land her in jail or on welfare or in an institution. But in this movie, she follows into Maria Curie's steps and finds love among fellow scientists. For a proper happy end, she also has to single-handedly solve a problem that hundreds of old bearded dudes failed at. Cheers to that.
For me this movie, despite its shortcomings, had a special touch because I am actually kinda like that girl myself. Well, I'm not autistic and I even had a successful business, but I'm still of that type in general. I'd say there are at least 8 times more men like this than there are women. So, guys would be unlikely to have a similar story. Simply because there are barely any girls to go around. Normally they just either stay alone, or have bad marriages/divorces or... I dunno... sell startups and buy trophy babes. Notice how just about every person around the heroine is a guy. That's accurate.
As a movie, it's not that exciting. Simply because the math part would be impenetrable to the vast majority of the audience. So it's reduced to gibberish and meaningless math symbols on blackboards. Instead, the movie focuses on the social inadequacy: at the age of 25, the heroine is still dependent on her mom. She quits her math PhD after her first failure and tries to survive in the city by taking up random working-class jobs. When she's inevitably fired from those for disrespecting authority, she starts earning cash illegally from Mahjong gambling. In real life this would eventually land her in jail or on welfare or in an institution. But in this movie, she follows into Maria Curie's steps and finds love among fellow scientists. For a proper happy end, she also has to single-handedly solve a problem that hundreds of old bearded dudes failed at. Cheers to that.
For me this movie, despite its shortcomings, had a special touch because I am actually kinda like that girl myself. Well, I'm not autistic and I even had a successful business, but I'm still of that type in general. I'd say there are at least 8 times more men like this than there are women. So, guys would be unlikely to have a similar story. Simply because there are barely any girls to go around. Normally they just either stay alone, or have bad marriages/divorces or... I dunno... sell startups and buy trophy babes. Notice how just about every person around the heroine is a guy. That's accurate.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesAccording to a NY Times article a reward of 1 million dollars was offered offered from 2000 to 2002. Currently there is no official monetary prize specifically for proving or disproving Goldbach's Conjecture similar to the prizes offered for some other famous problems, such as the Millennium Prize Problems.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Marguerite's Theorem?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Centrais de atendimento oficiais
- Idiomas
- Também conhecido como
- Marguerite's Theorem
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- € 2.870.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 1.162.522
- Tempo de duração1 hora 53 minutos
- Cor
- Proporção
- 2.39:1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
What is the Canadian French language plot outline for O Desafio de Marguerite (2023)?
Responda