De Rainha do Veganismo a Foragida
Título original: Bad Vegan: Fame. Fraud. Fugitives.
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,9/10
8,6 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Uma famosa chef vegana perde o controle da própria vida depois de se casar com um homem misterioso que garante que pode imortalizar o cachorro dela.Uma famosa chef vegana perde o controle da própria vida depois de se casar com um homem misterioso que garante que pode imortalizar o cachorro dela.Uma famosa chef vegana perde o controle da própria vida depois de se casar com um homem misterioso que garante que pode imortalizar o cachorro dela.
- Prêmios
- 1 indicação no total
Explorar episódios
Avaliações em destaque
This would be a mediocre story about a woman who falls for a run-of-the-mill con game, but perhaps people need to have a little sympathy that this happened to a real person, not an actor in a drama.
This show is framed as a documentary, but it's more like a docufiction that's based on a true story. You don't get his side of the story (for whatever that's worth), and you may argue how much of her vulnerability was caused by her loneliness and naivete (as she claims), or her trying to dig herself out of a hole she created that the con exploited.
She doesn't come across in the show as someone you would feel much sympathy for--a privileged, beautiful, Wharton business school grad, engaged in the pop culture foodie scene with celebrity connections, who falls from grace, ensnared by a ludicrous con man. But part of that is that this happened during a vulnerable time (emotional and/or financial?), which should be understandable. We can't really be a judge of how stressful it becomes when playing with big stakes, and the stupid things we do when we're trapped. And once we're trapped, we're trapped--and that's the point, I suppose. It's embarrassing, shameful, and cringy for us to watch, but I'd imagine it's more so to have to tell the story herself.
It's about as exciting as watching a train wreck in slow motion, a vegan version of Holmes and Theranos, but there are far worse shows out there.
This show is framed as a documentary, but it's more like a docufiction that's based on a true story. You don't get his side of the story (for whatever that's worth), and you may argue how much of her vulnerability was caused by her loneliness and naivete (as she claims), or her trying to dig herself out of a hole she created that the con exploited.
She doesn't come across in the show as someone you would feel much sympathy for--a privileged, beautiful, Wharton business school grad, engaged in the pop culture foodie scene with celebrity connections, who falls from grace, ensnared by a ludicrous con man. But part of that is that this happened during a vulnerable time (emotional and/or financial?), which should be understandable. We can't really be a judge of how stressful it becomes when playing with big stakes, and the stupid things we do when we're trapped. And once we're trapped, we're trapped--and that's the point, I suppose. It's embarrassing, shameful, and cringy for us to watch, but I'd imagine it's more so to have to tell the story herself.
It's about as exciting as watching a train wreck in slow motion, a vegan version of Holmes and Theranos, but there are far worse shows out there.
I think the main appeal of this docuseries is to see how con artists are getting caught. We all hope that karma will pick up where human justice fails.
The question whether Sarma was guilty or not is moot, IMO. Like everyone, she is flawed, and at the very least she made some very bad decisions.
What's more interesting is the extent to which intelligent, educated individuals fall pray to scams, and are dragged into questionable deeds, and from there into worse situations.
In this debacle, I sympathize with Sarma's father, who seems the most decent fellow in the story, and the one with the clearest understanding of what happened. He admitted his daughter was on the run when she disappeared, and even recognized the fact that Sarma married Anthony for his money.
I definitely found this documentary worth watching.
The question whether Sarma was guilty or not is moot, IMO. Like everyone, she is flawed, and at the very least she made some very bad decisions.
What's more interesting is the extent to which intelligent, educated individuals fall pray to scams, and are dragged into questionable deeds, and from there into worse situations.
In this debacle, I sympathize with Sarma's father, who seems the most decent fellow in the story, and the one with the clearest understanding of what happened. He admitted his daughter was on the run when she disappeared, and even recognized the fact that Sarma married Anthony for his money.
I definitely found this documentary worth watching.
Another true crime mini-series by Netflix. Interesting documentary to a certain extent; overly dragged out though. I watched the entire series in one sitting, and while it was a decent documentary I thought it was a little dragged out from start to finish. This series could have been a lot better if it had been shorter.
4 episodes is way too long. There is so much redundancy or things that are drawn out. There is no twist, conclusion, or closure.
The series is absolutely biased toward Sarma. Most of it is her telling her side of the story - whether it's truth is another thing entirely.
Speaking of what's true or not, I can't wrap my head around someone actually believing the supernatural claims she supposedly did. Making her dog immortal? Making her some non-human queen? What?! And she doesn't even acknowledge that she believed those things, really. She brushes EVERYTHING off by basically saying "I don't know why, I just did though." I do find the story itself interesting to an extent. But this presentation is extremely overdrawn and very disingenuous and emotionally manipulative.
This could have been made a short movie or 2 episodes, instead it's 4 hour-long episodes. I can't in good conscience recommend anyone invest that amount of time into this.
The series is absolutely biased toward Sarma. Most of it is her telling her side of the story - whether it's truth is another thing entirely.
Speaking of what's true or not, I can't wrap my head around someone actually believing the supernatural claims she supposedly did. Making her dog immortal? Making her some non-human queen? What?! And she doesn't even acknowledge that she believed those things, really. She brushes EVERYTHING off by basically saying "I don't know why, I just did though." I do find the story itself interesting to an extent. But this presentation is extremely overdrawn and very disingenuous and emotionally manipulative.
This could have been made a short movie or 2 episodes, instead it's 4 hour-long episodes. I can't in good conscience recommend anyone invest that amount of time into this.
This woman is playing the victim and I just don't buy it-
I mean what in the AF. Some fat gambling addict takes over your life and business and you're just powerless to stop it? Please. This whole thing is skewed so heavily towards victimhood for Sarma. Neither of them are victims. None of this makes any damn sense. The whole thing is stupid. I mean how could you fall for this?
I mean what in the AF. Some fat gambling addict takes over your life and business and you're just powerless to stop it? Please. This whole thing is skewed so heavily towards victimhood for Sarma. Neither of them are victims. None of this makes any damn sense. The whole thing is stupid. I mean how could you fall for this?
Você sabia?
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How many seasons does Bad Vegan: Fame. Fraud. Fugitives. have?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Bad Vegan: Fame. Fraud. Fugitives.
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração52 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 16:9 HD
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente